Advertisement

Peer Review Systems in Psychology

  • George Stricker

Abstract

Quality assessment is a process that is concerned with the measurement of the quality of care. It is a preliminary step to quality assurance, which is designed to improve the quality of care. Peer review is one method of quality assurance and occurs when the review and determination is made by a co-professional. It is concerned only with the quality of care that has been offered, not with the quality of care in the overall health delivery system, a concern that would require attention to untreated as well as treated cases.

Keywords

Mental Health Service American Psychological Association Health Care Practitioner Mental Health Benefit Residential Treatment Center 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Medical Association. Model screening criteria to assist professional standards review organizations. Chicago: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association, Peer Review Committee. Manual of psychiatric peer review. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Standards Review. Procedures manual for professional standards review committees of state psychological associations. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Brook, R. H., & Appel, F. A. Quality of care assessment: Choosing a method for peer review. New England Journal of Medicine, 1973, 288, 1323–1329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brook, R. H., & Davies-Avery, A. Mechanisms for assuring quality of U.S. medical care services: Past, present, and future (R-1939-HEW). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Co., 1977.Google Scholar
  6. Brook, R. H., & Williams, K. N. Evaluation of the New Mexico peer review system. Medical Care, 1976, 14. (Supplement).Google Scholar
  7. Brook, R. H., Williams, K. N., & Davies-Avery, A. Quality assurance today and tomorrow: Forecast for the future. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1976, 85, 809–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claiborn, W. L., Biskin, B. H. L., & Friedman, L. S. CHAMPUS and quality assurance. Professional Psychology, 1982, 13, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conger, J. J. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1975: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 406–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Copeland, B. A. Hospital privileges and staff membership for psychologists. Professional Psychology, 1980, 11, 676–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Professional Standards Review. PSRO program manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Donabedian, A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966, 44 (2), 166–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dörken, H. CHAMPUS ten-state claim experience for mental disorder: Fiscal year 1975. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 697–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goran, M. J., Roberts, J. S., Kellogg, M. A., Fielding, J., & Jessee, W. The PSRO hospital review system. Medical Care, 1975, 13. (Supplement).Google Scholar
  15. Hays, J. R. Three methods of peer review in a state mental hospital system. Psychological Reports, 1977, 41, 519–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Health Care Financing Administration. Technical assistance document No. 9: Suggestions for peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians in PSRO short-stay hospital review. Rockville, Md.: Author, 1977. (a).Google Scholar
  17. Health Care Financing Administration. PSRO transmit tal No. 44: Policies applicable to PSROs involving health care practitioners other than physicians in peer review in short-stay hospitals. Rockville, Md.: Author, 1977. (b).Google Scholar
  18. Health Care Financing Administration. Professional standards review organization 1978 program evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Kazanjian, V. Peer review: A private practice model. Professional Psychology, 1982, 13, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matarazzo, J. D. The interview: Its reliability and validity in psychiatric diagnosis. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenberg, A. M., & Theaman, M. The Professional Standards Review Committee: Form and function. Professional Psychology, 1982, 13, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seidenberg, G. R. Federal efforts toward quality assurance. Unpublished paper, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Stricker, G. Personality assessment and insurance reimbursement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1978, 42, 317–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stricker, G. Criteria for insurance review of psychological services. Professional Psychology, 1979, 10, 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willens, J. Colorado Medicare study: A history. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 746–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Stricker
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Psychological StudiesAdelphi UniversityGarden CityUSA

Personalised recommendations