Standards for Psychological Measurement

  • Robert M. Guion


Three generations of the documents informally known as “testing standards” have been published (American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1954, 1966, 1974). The first two documents described the proper content of manuals provided by publishers to accompany tests; they were primarily standards of information. The third added requirements for test users.


Test Score American Psychological Association Latent Trait Test User Item Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51, 201–238.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Anastasi, A. Psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Bindra, D. A theory of intelligent behavior. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, R. L., & Kane, M. T. An index of dependability for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977, 14, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brody, E. B., & Brody, N. Intelligence: Nature, determinants, and consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, F. G. Principles of educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. Mathematical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J. Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1949, 46, 393–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronbach, L. J. Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Cronbach, L. J. Test validity. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J. On the design of educational measures. In D. N. M. deGruijter & L. J. T. van der Kamp (Eds.), Advances in psychological and educational measurement. London: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. The dependability of behavioral measurement: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Darlington, R. B. Multiple regression in psychological and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebel, R. L. Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Guion, R. M. Content validity—The source of my discontent. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977, 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guion, R. M. Scoring of content domain samples: The problem of fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hambleton, R. K., & Cook, L. L. Latent trait models and their use in the analysis of educational test data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977, 14, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., Algina, J., & Coulson, D. B. Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: A review of technical issues and developments. Review of Educational Research, 1978, 48, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horst, P. Psychological measurement and prediction. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1966.Google Scholar
  24. Huynh, H. On the reliability of decisions in domain-referenced testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1976, 13, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ironson, G. H. A comparative study of several methods of assessing item bias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Lawshe, C. H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 1975, 28, 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linn, R. L. Issues of validity in measurement for competency-based programs. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Livingston, S. A. A criterion-referenced application of classical test theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972, 9, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messick, S. The standard problems: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messick, S., & Ross, J. (Eds.). Measurement in personality and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  31. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. Roskind, W. L. Detroit Edison v. National Labor Relations Board. In C. P. Sparks (Chair), Open versus secure testing. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  33. Rudner, L. M. An evaluation of selected approaches for biased item identification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America, 1977.Google Scholar
  34. Schimmel, D. J. Subscale analysis and appropriate domain sampling in the initial development of a measure of assertive behavior. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bowling Green State University, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. W. Statistical power in criterion-related validity studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sternberg, R. J. Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  37. Tenopyr, M. L. Content-construct confusion. Personnel Psychology, 1977, 30, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thurstone, L. L. The Rorschach in psychological science. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1948, 43, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thurstone, L. L. The criterion problem in personality research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1955, 15, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Underwood, B. J. Psychological research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.Google Scholar
  41. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Private pilot—airplane; written test guide, EA-AC 61-32B, 1977.Google Scholar
  42. Wiggins, J. S. Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1973.Google Scholar
  43. Yerkes, R. M. (Ed.). Psychological examining in the United State Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 15). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1921.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Guion
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations