Advertisement

Psychology, Professional Practice, and the Public Interest

  • Gottlieb C. Simon

Abstract

Implicit in the title of this chapter is the idea that there can be a gap—potentially a very large one—between the interests of psychology as a profession and the interests of our clients and society as a whole. To George Bernard Shaw’s contemporary followers, those who believe with him that all professions are conspiracies against the laity, it hardly could be otherwise. For many practicing psychologists, however, this idea may seem not only unacceptable but unthinkable. To them, a profession, because it is predicated on the service ethic, must perforce be in the public interest. Nonetheless, professionals, like other people, are guided not only by our desire to do good for others, but by our desire to do all right for ourselves. There is more than one aspect to our motivation. We are influenced not only by the public interest, but by our guild interests: the desire for increased income, social acceptance, influence, and power. The problem for us, and for society, is that these separate interests can and do pull us in different directions. When they do, which way will we turn? Former APA president M. Brewster Smith (1976) has called attention to the “natural tendency” of “APA lobbying and related activity ... to gravitate toward the guild rather than the public interest component” (p. 2).

Keywords

Public Interest Professional Practice American Psychological Association Professional Psychology Concerned Professional 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accounting: The good guys. Newsweek, January 7, 1974, pp. 57-58.Google Scholar
  2. Ad Hoc Committee on Advocacy. The Social worker as advocate: Champion of social victims. Social Work, 1969, 14, 16–17.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, S., & Orgel, M. Through the mental health maze. Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Agel, J. The radical therapist. New York: Ballantine, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Alinsky, S. D. Rules for radicals. New York: Random House, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association. Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychological Association. Committee on Scientific and Professional Responsibility. Social influences on the standards of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. American Psychological Association. Psychology as a profession. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1968.Google Scholar
  9. American Psychological Association. Psychology and national health care. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 1025–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. American Psychological Association. Guidelines for conditions of employment of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(a).Google Scholar
  12. American Psychological Association. Standards for providers of psychological services. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(b).Google Scholar
  13. American Psychological Association. Bylaws of the American Psychological Association. In Biographical Directory, Washington, D.C.: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. American Psychological Association and Conference of State Psychological Associations, Committees on Legislation. Joint report of the APA and CSPA Committees on Legislation. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 727–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Armstrong, J. S. Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 1977, 5, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Aug, S. M. Accounting aid without advocacy. Washington Star, October 25, 1977, p. B5.Google Scholar
  17. Bandura, A. An encouraging change. APA Monitor, January 1975, p. 12.Google Scholar
  18. Banfield, E. C. Note on conceptual scheme. In M. Meyerson & E. C. Banfield (Eds.), Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  19. Barber, P. Screening criticism rejected. Reno Gazette, November 29, 1977, p. 12.Google Scholar
  20. Bauer, R. A. Can psychologists be socially relevant? Professional Psychology, 1971, 2, 111–117.Google Scholar
  21. Bentham, J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner, 1948.Google Scholar
  22. Bernal, E. M. A response to “Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged subjects.” American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Berry, J. M. Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 199–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cassinelli, C. W. The public interest in political ethics. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.Google Scholar
  26. Chein, I. The science of behavior and the image of man. New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Citibank. The public interest. The Washington Post, February 22, 1978, p. D16.Google Scholar
  28. Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cochran, C. C. Political science and “the public interest.” Journal of Politics, 1974, 36, 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, H. S., & Miike, L. H. Toward a more responsive system of professional licensure. International Journal of Health Services, 1974, 4, 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Combs, A. W. Problems and definitions in legislation. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 554–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Conger, J. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1976. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 408–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dailey, J. T., & Pickrel, E. W. Some psychological contributions to defense against hyjackers. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Report on licensure and related health personnel credentialing. (DHEW Publication No. HSM 72-11) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.Google Scholar
  35. Deutsch, C. P. After legislation—what price psychology. American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 645–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Down, A. Inside bureacracy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.Google Scholar
  37. Durlak, J. A. Comparative effectiveness of paraprofessional and professional helpers. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 80–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eastman, H. Statement on S:1210: A bill to protect “whistle blowers.” Testimony presented to the Subcommittee on Administative Practice and Procedure, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, June 13, 1975.Google Scholar
  39. Edsall, J. Scientific freedom and responsibility. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1975.Google Scholar
  40. Ellis, A. Pros and cons of legislation for psychologists. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 551–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., & Tornatzky, L. G. Creating change in mental health organizations. New York: Pergamon, 1974.Google Scholar
  42. Finkler, E. Dissent and independent initiative in planning offices. Planning Advisory Service Reports, 1971, Report #269.Google Scholar
  43. Flathman, R. E. The public interest: An essay concerning the normative discourse of politics. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  44. Freedman, J. One social worker’s fight for mental patients’ rights. Social Work, 1971, 16, 92–95.Google Scholar
  45. Freundenberger, H. J. Burnout: Occupational hazard of the child care worker. Child Care Quarterly, 1977, 6(2), 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Friedman, E. A call to action. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1973, 2, 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Friedman, M. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  48. Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.Google Scholar
  49. Gaylin, W., Glasser, I., Marcus, S., & Rothman, D. Doing good: The limits of benevolence. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  50. Gellhorn, W. Individual freedom and governmental restraints. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
  51. Glenn, M., & Kunnes, R. Repression or revolution? Therapy in the United States today. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.Google Scholar
  52. Goode, W. J. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology, and medicine. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 902–914.Google Scholar
  53. Goodman, C. Whistleblowing and free speech. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Management Association, Anaheim, California, October 1975.Google Scholar
  54. Goodwin, L. Can social science help resolve national problems? New York: Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  55. Green, M. J. The perils of public interest law. New Republic, September 20,1975, p. 20-23.Google Scholar
  56. Gross, S. J. The myth of professional licensing. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Halleck, S. L. The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.Google Scholar
  58. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162, 1243–1248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hardin, G., & Baden, J. (Eds.). Managing the commons. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
  60. Havelock, R. G., & Havelock, M. C. Training for change agents: A guide to the design of tracing programs in education and other fields. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1973.Google Scholar
  61. Held, V. The public interest and individual interests. New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  62. Henley, N. Facing down the man. In J. Agel (Ed.), Rough times. New York: Ballantine, 1973.Google Scholar
  63. Hentoff, N. Striking to be professional. Village Voice, July 12, 1973, p. 27.Google Scholar
  64. Hogan, D. B. The regulation of psychotherapists (Vol. 1): A study in the philosophy and practice of professional regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1979.Google Scholar
  65. Hornstein, H. A., Bunker, B. B., Burke, W. W., Gindes, M., & Lewicki. Social intervention: A behavioral science approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  66. Houg, M. R., & Sussman, M. B. Professional autonomy and the revolt of the client. Social Problems, 1969, 17, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Howard, J. M., & Somers, R. H. Resisting institutional evil from within. In N. Sanford & C. Comstock (Eds.), Sanctions for evil. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  68. Hurvitz, N. Psychotherapy as a means of social control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 232–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jackson, G. D. On the report of the ad hoc Committee on Educational Uses of Tests with Disadvantaged Students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jones, W. H. Activist economists. Washington Post, February 25, 1973, p. LI.Google Scholar
  71. Kahn, S. How people get power. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
  72. Kaplan, A. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.Google Scholar
  73. Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, A. S. Some comments on “After legislation...” American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kohl, H. Half the house. New York: Bantam, 1976.Google Scholar
  75. Koocher, G. P. Credentialing in psychology: Close encounters with competence? Unpublished manuscript, 1978.Google Scholar
  76. Kopolow, L. E., & Bloom, H. (Eds.). Mental health advocacy: An emerging force in consumers’ rights. (DHEW Publication No. (ABM) 77–455). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
  77. Korten, F. F., Cook, S. W., & Lacey, J. I. (Eds.). Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.Google Scholar
  78. Krause, M. S., & Howard, K. L. Program evaluation in the public interest: A new research methodology. Community Mental Health Journal, 1976, 12, 291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kutchins, H., & Kutchins, S. Advocacy and social work. In G. H. Weber & G. J. McCall (Eds.), Social scientists as advocates: Views from the applied disciplines. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
  80. Lawrence, E. S. Where angels fear to tread: Reply to Spaner. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.Google Scholar
  81. League of Women Voters. Public action kit. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1976.Google Scholar
  82. Levine, D. The danger of social action. In D. Harshbarger & R. F. Maley (Eds.), Behavioral analysis and systems analysis. Kalamazoo: Behavioredelia, 1974.Google Scholar
  83. Lindauer, M. J. Government employee disclosures of agency wrongdoing: Protecting the right to blow the whistle. University of Chicago Law Review, 1975, 42, 530–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lippett, R. The dynamics of planned change. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1958.Google Scholar
  85. Lippman, W. Essays in the public philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1955.Google Scholar
  86. Marks, F. R., Leswing, K., & Fortinsky, B. The lawyer, the public, and professional responsibility. Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1972.Google Scholar
  87. Marston, A. R. Reflections after a confrontation with the Gay Liberation Front. Professional Psychology, 1974, 5, 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Maslach, C. Burned-out. Human Behavior, 1978, 7(9), 16–22.Google Scholar
  89. Matthews v. Washington, Civil Action No. 76-0918, December 22,1976, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.Google Scholar
  90. Maurizi, A. Occupational licensing and the public interest. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McConochie, W. A. Letter to the editor. Oregon Psychological Association Newsletter, February 1973, p. 5.Google Scholar
  92. Miller, A. Whistleblowing and the law. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.Google Scholar
  93. Minogue, K. Common good (The). In M. Cranston (Ed.), A glossary of political terms; A background book. London: Bodley Head, 1966.Google Scholar
  94. Mitnick, B. M. A topology of conceptions of the public interest. Administration & Society, 1976, 8, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mobil. Who’s the public in “public interest” politics? Washington Post, November 4, 1979, p. C2.Google Scholar
  96. Moore, T. G. The purpose of licensing. Journal of Law and Economics, 1961, 4, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nader, R. An anatomy of whistle blowing. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.Google Scholar
  98. Nader, R., Petkas, P., & Blackwell, K. (Eds.). Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.Google Scholar
  99. National Institute of Mental Health. Planning for creative change in mental health service: A distillation of principles on research utilization (Vol. 1). Publication No. (HSM) 71–9060. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
  100. National written examination. American Association of State Psychology Boards Newsletter, 1978, 24(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
  101. Nietzel, M. T., & Moss, C. S. The psychologist in the criminal justice system. Professional Psychology, 1972, 3, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Nord, W. R. The failure of current applied behavioral science—a Marxian perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10, 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. O. M. Collective. The organizer’s manual. New York: Bantam, 1971.Google Scholar
  104. Olley, R. E. The future of self-regulation: A consumer economist’s viewpoint. In P. Slayton & M. J. Trebilcock (Eds.), The professions and public policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  105. Oppenheimer, M., & Lakey, G. A manual for direct action. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1964.Google Scholar
  106. Patti, R. J. Limitations and prospects of internal advocacy. Social Casework, 1974, 55, 537–545.Google Scholar
  107. Patti, R. J., & Resnick, H. Changing the agency from within. Social Work, 1972, 17, 48–57.Google Scholar
  108. Peatman, J. G. The problem of protecting the public by appropriate legislation for the practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 102–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Pennock, J. R. The one and the many: A note on the concept. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.Google Scholar
  110. Perl, M., Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Public-interest science—An overview. Physics Today, 1974, 27, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Peters, C., & Branch, T. Blowing the whistle: Dissent in the public interest. New York: Praeger, 1972.Google Scholar
  112. Pfeffer, J. Some evidence on occupational licensing and occupational incomes. Social Forces, 1974, 53, 102–111.Google Scholar
  113. Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).Google Scholar
  114. Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Advice and dissent: Scientists in the political arena. New York: New American Library, 1974.Google Scholar
  115. Ralph Nader assesses consumer movements future. Washington Post, August 5, 1979, p. F1.Google Scholar
  116. Rappaport, J. Education, training, and dealing with the contingent future. Unpublished manuscript, 1978.Google Scholar
  117. Ricks, J. H. Certifying psychologists in New York state. In, Competent or incompetent—Decisions from examinations. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, August 1973.Google Scholar
  118. Rogers, C. Some new challenges. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Ross, D. K. A public citizen’s action manual. New York: Grossman, 1973.Google Scholar
  120. Rothman, J. Planning and organizing for social change: Action principles from social science research. New York: Columbia University, 1974.Google Scholar
  121. Ryan, W. Blaming the victim. New York: Random House, 1971.Google Scholar
  122. Sanford, D. Me & Ralph: Is Nader unsafe for America? Washington, D.C.: New Republic, 1976.Google Scholar
  123. Schubert, G. Is there a public interest theory? In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.Google Scholar
  124. Scriven, M. “First the roses...” APA Monitor, 1975, 6, 2–3.Google Scholar
  125. Simon, G. C. Professional psychology and the public interest: The report of the summer intern project on increasing professional activity in the public interest. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1973.Google Scholar
  126. Simon, G. C. Psychology and the “treatment rights movement.” Professional Psychology, 1975, 6, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Simon, G. C. Ethical and social issues in professional psychology. In B. Wolman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis and neurology (Vol. 4). New York: Aesculapius 1977.Google Scholar
  128. Simon, G. C. The psychologist as whistle blower: A case study. Professional Psychology, 1978, 9, 322–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Smith, M. B. A fond farewell. APA Monitor, 1976, 7(4), 2.Google Scholar
  130. Sorauf, F. J. The conceptual model. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.Google Scholar
  131. Spaner, F. E. The psychotherapist as an activity in social change: A proponent. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.Google Scholar
  132. Specht, H. Disruptive tactics. Social Work, 1969, 14, 5–15.Google Scholar
  133. Specter, G. Power: A repossession manual; organizing strategies for citizens. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1978.Google Scholar
  134. Stein, D. The community psychologist as advocate: His role and his training. International Journal of Mental Health, 1974, 3, 127–138.Google Scholar
  135. Stigall, T. Comment on Hogan. APA Monitor, September/October 1979, p. 36-37.Google Scholar
  136. Suchotlif, L. C., Steinfeld, G. J., & Tolchin, G. The struggle for patients’ rights in a state hospital. Mental Hygiene, 1970, 54, 230–240.Google Scholar
  137. Sullivan, J. B. Working with citizen’s groups. Physics Today, June 1974, p. 32-37.Google Scholar
  138. Tabachnik, L. Licensing in the legal and medical professions, 1820–1860: A historical case study. In J. Gerstl & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Professions for the people: The politics of skill. New York: Schenkman, 1976.Google Scholar
  139. Talbott, J. A. Radical psychiatry: An examination of the issues. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974, 131, 121–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Tarasoff v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 529 P.2d 342, 118 Cal. Rptr. 129 (1974), vacated, 17 Cal.3d 425, 551 P.2d 384, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976).Google Scholar
  141. von Hippel, F., & Primack, J. Public interest science. Science, 1972, 177, 1166–1171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Warren, R., & Warren, D. I. The neighborhood organizer’s guidebook. Notre Dame. University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  143. Weisband, E., & Franck, T. M. Resignation in protest. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  144. What is the public interest? Newsweek, March 25,1974, pp. 60-62.Google Scholar
  145. Whyte, W. F. Organizational behavior: Theory and applications. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey, 1969.Google Scholar
  146. Wineman, D., & James, A. The advocacy challenge to schools of social work. Social Work, 1969, 14, 23–32.Google Scholar
  147. Witmer, J. M. Professional disclosure in licensure. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1978, 38, 71–73.Google Scholar
  148. Wolfinger, R. E., Shapiro, M., & Greenstein, F. Dynamics of American politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.Google Scholar
  149. Wright, C. ‘Pro Bono’ Cases grow for accounting group. Washington Post, April 9,1978, p. K14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gottlieb C. Simon
    • 1
  1. 1.USA

Personalised recommendations