Advertisement

The Context of Professional Psychology

  • Bruce Dennis Sales

Abstract

From the time we start as undergraduate majors in psychology, we are taught the theories, methods, and findings that are the substance of the science of psychology. As graduate students, we learn of the professional aspects of this substance and become proficient in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorder if clinical is our specialty. The pattern is similar for the other recognized specialties—counseling, industrial-organizational, and school psychology. Thus, as professional psychologists,1 we are typically very well trained in how to best provide primary psychological services to our clients.

Keywords

Professional Practice American Psychological Association Professional Organization Health Service Provider Professional Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. Standards for providers of pyschological services. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. Criteria for accreditation of doctoral training programs and internships in professional psychology. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Practice. Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 639–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. American Psychological Association, Division of Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures. Dayton, Ohio: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Massad, P., Sales, B. D., & Acosta, E. Utilizing social science information in the policy process: Can psychologists help? In R. F. Kidd & M. Saks (Eds.), Advances in applied social psychology (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. Sales, B. D., Powell, D. M., Van Duizend, R., & Associates. Disabled persons and the law: State legislative issues. New York: Plenum Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Federal contract compliance manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. Adoption by four agencies of uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 1978, 43, 38290–38315.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Dennis Sales
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations