Panel Summary Dynamic Perception of the Environment

  • Walter Gerbino


Dynamic concepts enter the explanation of perception in several ways. And probably, some degree of ambiguity exists whenever one encounters statements in which perception is claimed to be “dynamic” (in opposition to something else). This panel is an attempt of elucidating the different meanings relevant to this area.


Motion Perception Representational Momentum Dynamic Concept Kinetic Depth Gestalt Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Wertheimer, Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol.61, pp. 161–265 (1912), English selection in Classics in Psychology, T. Shipley ed., Philosophical Library, New York, NY, pp. 1032-1089 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Rock, In defense of unconscious inference, in Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception, W. Epstein ed., Wiley, New York, NY (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Rock, The Logic of Perception, MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Julesz, Foundations of Cyclopean Perception, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Gerbino, La Percezione, Il Mulino, Bologna, I (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Duncker, Über induzierte Bewegung (Ein Beitrag zur Theorie optisch wahrgenommener Bewegung), Psychologische Forschung, Vol. 12, pp. 180–259 (1929), English selection in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, W.D. Ellis ed., Routledge e Kegan, London, UK, pp. 161-172 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Rubin, Visuell wahrgenommene wirkliche Bewegungen, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 103, pp. 384–392 (1927).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Wallach, Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung, Psychologische Forschung, Vol.20, pp. 22–380 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Johansson, Configurations in Event Perception, Almqvist and Wiksell, Uppsala, SW (1950).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Johansson, Visual motion perception, Scientific American, Vol.232, No.6, pp. 76–88 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Metzger, Gesetze des Sehens, Kramer, Frankfurt, D (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.R. Proffitt and J.E. Cutting, An invariant for wheel-generated motions and the logic of its determination, Perception, Vol.9, pp. 435–449 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Wallach, Eye movement and motion perception, in Tutorials on Motion Perception, A.H. Wertheim, W.A. Wagenaar, and H.W. Leibowitz eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Wallach and D.N. O’Connell, The kinetic depth effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.45, pp. 205-217, reprinted in On Perception, H. Wallach, Quadrangle, New York, NY (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Wechsler, Computational Vision, Academic Press, New York, NY (1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Michotte, Causalité, Permanence et Réalité Phénoménales, Publicationes Universitaires, Louvain, B (1946), English translation in The Perception of Causality, Methuen, London, UK (1963).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Runeson and G. Frykholm, Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol.112, pp. 585–615 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Metzger, Optische Untersuchungen am Ganzfeld: II. Zur Phänomenologie des homogenen Ganzfelds, Psychologische Forschung, Vol.13, pp. 6–29 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Koffka, Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt Brace, New York, NY (1935).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.J. Freyd, Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations, in Attention and Performance XIV, D.E. Meyer and S. Kornblum eds., MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA (1992).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.J. Freyd and R.A. Finke, Representational momentum, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol.10, pp. 126–132 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Gerbino
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di PsicologiaUniversità di TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations