Skip to main content

Resource Allocation in Intimate Relationships

Trying to Make Sense of a Confusing Literature

  • Chapter
Entitlement and the Affectional Bond

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Abstract

A considerable literature now exists dealing with the rules or norms by which people divide resources in their intimate relationships—that is, in their friendships, family relationships, and romantic relationships. Researchers have often suggested or implied that a single rule is likely to the rule governing the giving and receiving of benefits in intimate relationships. They have examined both adherence to various rules in these relationships and satisfaction in the relationship given the apparent use of one particular rule or another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. A. (1971). Productivity, distributive justice, and bargaining among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. (1984). The development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., & Clark, M. S. (1986). Differences in social exchange between intimate and other relationships: Gradually evolving or quickly apparent? In V. J. Derlega and B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., & McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and exchange in continuing and non-continuing dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 942–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., & Henton, J. M. (1985). The effect of equity, equality and reward level on the stability of students’ premarital relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 715–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., Henton, J. M., & Larson, J. H. (1982). Fairness and reward level as predictors of relationship satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Corcoran, D. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Taraban, C. (1991). Reactions to three emotions in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S., & Lerner, M. J. (1989). A new look at equity and outcomes as determinants of satisfaction in close personal relationships. Social Justice Besearch, 3, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A socio-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior in exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1983). Equity and equality as clues to the relationship between exchange participants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 195–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. L. (1987). Reward level and marital adjustment: The effect of weighing rewards. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 549–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Utne, M. K., & Traupmann, J. (1979). Social exchange in developing relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Equity theory and intimate relationships. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). Social exchange in developing relations: An overview. In R. Burgess & T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice. Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1983). Need consideration in allocation decisions: Is it just? Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M., Miller, D., & Holmes, J. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S., Cate, R. M., & Henton, J. (1982). Equity and rewards as predictors of satisfaction in casual and intimate relationships. Journal of Psychology, 110, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lujansky, H., & Mikula, G. (1983). Can equity explain the quality and stability of romantic relationships? British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W. (1985). Satisfaction with intimate exchange: Gender-role differences and impact of equity, equality, and rewards. Sex Roles, 13, 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W., Edwards, J. N., & Acock, A. C. (1984). Satisfaction in intamate relationships as a function of inequality, inequity, and outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Communal and exchange relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Clark, M. S., & Ford, T. (1992). Development of a measure of strength of communal relationships. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataki, S., Shapiro, C., & Clark, M. S. (1992). Acquiring distributive justice norms: Effects of age and relationship type. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionaly of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Lowery, D., Hubbard, M. L., Matavankin, O. J., & Neises, M. (1988). Impact of employee mobility and employee performance on the allocation of rewards under conditions of constraint. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatelli, R. M., & Cecil-Pigo, E. F. (1985). Relational interdependence and commitment in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 931–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1981). Equity in marital roles across the family cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1981). The importance of “fairness” for marital satisfaction of older women. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M. K., Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Greenberger, D. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1989). Providing helping and desired relationship type as determinants of changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722–734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1992). Impact of desired relationship type on affective reactions to choosing and being required to help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, M.S., Chrisman, K. (1994). Resource Allocation in Intimate Relationships. In: Lerner, M.J., Mikula, G. (eds) Entitlement and the Affectional Bond. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0986-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0984-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics