Abstract
A considerable literature now exists dealing with the rules or norms by which people divide resources in their intimate relationships—that is, in their friendships, family relationships, and romantic relationships. Researchers have often suggested or implied that a single rule is likely to the rule governing the giving and receiving of benefits in intimate relationships. They have examined both adherence to various rules in these relationships and satisfaction in the relationship given the apparent use of one particular rule or another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402–408.
Benton, A. A. (1971). Productivity, distributive justice, and bargaining among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 68–78.
Berg, J. (1984). The development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346–356.
Berg, J. H., & Clark, M. S. (1986). Differences in social exchange between intimate and other relationships: Gradually evolving or quickly apparent? In V. J. Derlega and B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction. New York: Springer.
Berg, J. H., & McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and exchange in continuing and non-continuing dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 942–952.
Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., & Henton, J. M. (1985). The effect of equity, equality and reward level on the stability of students’ premarital relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 715–725.
Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., Henton, J. M., & Larson, J. H. (1982). Fairness and reward level as predictors of relationship satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 177–181.
Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549–557.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.
Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Corcoran, D. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533–542.
Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333–338.
Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103.
Clark, M. S., Taraban, C. (1991). Reactions to three emotions in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324–336.
Desmarais, S., & Lerner, M. J. (1989). A new look at equity and outcomes as determinants of satisfaction in close personal relationships. Social Justice Besearch, 3, 105–109.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–148.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A socio-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior in exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.
Greenberg, J. (1983). Equity and equality as clues to the relationship between exchange participants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 195–196.
Hansen, G. L. (1987). Reward level and marital adjustment: The effect of weighing rewards. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 549–551.
Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships. New York: Springer.
Hatfield, E., Utne, M. K., & Traupmann, J. (1979). Social exchange in developing relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Equity theory and intimate relationships. New York: Academic Press.
Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.
Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum.
Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). Social exchange in developing relations: An overview. In R. Burgess & T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relations. New York: Academic Press.
Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice. Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425–429.
Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1983). Need consideration in allocation decisions: Is it just? Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 205–209.
Lerner, M. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 539–550.
Lerner, M., Miller, D., & Holmes, J. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
Lloyd, S., Cate, R. M., & Henton, J. (1982). Equity and rewards as predictors of satisfaction in casual and intimate relationships. Journal of Psychology, 110, 43–48.
Lujansky, H., & Mikula, G. (1983). Can equity explain the quality and stability of romantic relationships? British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 101–112.
Martin, M. W. (1985). Satisfaction with intimate exchange: Gender-role differences and impact of equity, equality, and rewards. Sex Roles, 13, 597–605.
Michaels, J. W., Edwards, J. N., & Acock, A. C. (1984). Satisfaction in intamate relationships as a function of inequality, inequity, and outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 347–357.
Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Communal and exchange relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mills, J., Clark, M. S., & Ford, T. (1992). Development of a measure of strength of communal relationships. Unpublished manuscript.
Pataki, S., Shapiro, C., & Clark, M. S. (1992). Acquiring distributive justice norms: Effects of age and relationship type. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 427–442.
Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionaly of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
Rusbult, C. E., Lowery, D., Hubbard, M. L., Matavankin, O. J., & Neises, M. (1988). Impact of employee mobility and employee performance on the allocation of rewards under conditions of constraint. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 605–615.
Sabatelli, R. M., & Cecil-Pigo, E. F. (1985). Relational interdependence and commitment in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 931–937.
Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1981). Equity in marital roles across the family cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 359–367.
Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1981). The importance of “fairness” for marital satisfaction of older women. Unpublished manuscript.
Utne, M. K., Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Greenberger, D. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 323–332.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 82–92.
Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1989). Providing helping and desired relationship type as determinants of changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722–734.
Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1992). Impact of desired relationship type on affective reactions to choosing and being required to help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 10–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, M.S., Chrisman, K. (1994). Resource Allocation in Intimate Relationships. In: Lerner, M.J., Mikula, G. (eds) Entitlement and the Affectional Bond. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0986-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0984-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive