Changing Sex-Role Expectations and Men’s Concerns with Justice in the Home

  • Faye Crosby
  • Rehana Farrell
  • Ann E. Cameron
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)


Is and ought are readily confused. People have difficulty questioning, or even noticing, that they might question the fairness of long-standing social arrangements. Only during times of change does the justice of existing conventions become a matter of concern.


Child Care Distributive Justice Household Labor Sexual Script Domestic Labor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agassi, J. B. (1982). Comparing the work attitudes of women and men. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, R. C., & Baruch, G. K. (1987). Determinants of father’s participation in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckett, J., & Smith, A. (1981). Work and family roles: Egalitarian marriage in black and white families. Social Service Review, 55, 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieraat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berardo, D. H., Shehan, C. L., & Leslie, G. R. (1987). A residue of tradition: Jobs, careers, and spouses’ time in housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crosby, F. J. (1991). Juggling: The unexpected advantages of balancing career and home for women and their families. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crosby, F., & Jaskar, K. (1993). Women and men at home: Realities and illusions. In S. Oskamp and M Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society. Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 143–171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender and the social order. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, R. (1991). Polls and surveys of domestic labor. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Fleming, J. J. (1988). Public opinion on change in women’s rights and roles. In S. M. Dornbusch & M. H. Strobes (Eds.), Feminism, children, and the new families (pp. 47–66). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Fowlkes, M. R. (1987). Role combinations and role conflict: Introductory perspective. In F. J. Crosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles (pp. 3–10). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hochschild, A., with Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  15. Kahn, W., & Crosby, F. J. (1985). Change and stasis: Discriminating between attitudes and discriminatory behavior. In L. Larwood, B. A. Gutek, & A. H. Stromberg (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 1, pp. 215–238). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klineberg, S. L. (1988). Houston area surveys. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, S. C. (1981). Adapting to scarcity and change: Stating the problem. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lemer (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 3–10). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. H. (1988). Attitudes toward women’ familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977–1985. Gender and Society, 2, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Prentice, D., & Crosby, F. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 165–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Schor, J. B. (1992). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  24. Shelton, B. A. (1990). The distribution of household tasks: Does wife’s employment make a difference? Journal of Family Issues, 11, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silberstein, L. (1992). Dual-professional families: A system in transition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Steil, J. M., & Turetsky, B. A. (1987). Marital influence levels and symptomatology among wives. In F. J. Crosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles (pp. 74–90). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Thoits, P. A. (1987). Negotiating roles. In F. J. Crosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles (pp. 11–22). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Walster, E., Bersheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiss, R. S. (1987). Men and their wives’ work. In F. J. Crosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles (pp. 109–121). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Weiss, R. S. (1990). Staying the course. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faye Crosby
    • 1
  • Rehana Farrell
    • 2
  • Ann E. Cameron
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA
  2. 2.KingstonUSA
  3. 3.Social-Personality Psychology, Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations