Advertisement

Passive Dosimetry Possibilities for Use in Risk Assessment

Critique on the “Guidance Document” with Respect to Passive Dosimetry
  • Wolfgang Maasfeld
Part of the NATO · Challenges of Modern Society book series (NATS, volume 19)

Abstract

A clear estimation of exposure is an important step in the risk assessment for pesticides. In the “Guidance Document” prepared by Chester (1995) the available methods for measuring pesticide exposure to operators and others are reviewed and guidance is given for the determination of exposure and absorption. The “Guidance Document” provides flexibility on the approaches that can be used when conducting an exposure study.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Guidance Document Pesticide Exposure Inhalation Exposure Actual Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmichael, N.G, 1995, Pesticide exposure: Overview of the tier approach, in: “Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods of Pesticide Exposure Assessment”, October 5–8, 1993, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  2. Chester, G., 1995, The conduct of field studies to evaluate the exposure of operators, workers and bystanders to pesticides, in: “Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods of Pesticide Exposure Assessment”, October 5–8, 1993, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  3. Council Directive 78/631/EEC: Council Directive of June 26, 1978, for the Approximation of the laws of the Member States Relating to Classification, Packaging, and Labelling of Dangerous Preparations (Pesticides); OJ No. L 206 of July 29, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Durham, W.F., and Wolfe, H.R., 1962, Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides, Bull. WHO 26: 75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenske, R.A., 1990, Nonuniformal dermal deposition patterns during occupational exposure to pesticides Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19:332.Google Scholar
  6. Groupement International des Associations Nationales de Fabricants de Produits Agrochimiques, 1990, “Monitoring Studies in the Assessment of Field Worker Exposure to Pesticides”, Technical Monograph No. 14, GIFAP, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. Hackathorn, D.R., and Eherhart, D.C., 1985, Data-base proposal for use in predicting mixer-loaderapplicator exposure, in: “Dermal Exposure Related to Pesticide Use”, R.C. Honeycutt, G. Zweig andGoogle Scholar
  8. N.N. Ragsdale, eds., ACS Symp. Series 273:341–355, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. MullR.and McCarthy, J.F., 1986, Guidelines for conducting mixer-loader-applicator studies Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 28:328.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987), Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision U, Applicator Exposure Monitoring, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Maasfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Bayer AG Plant Protection DevelopmentInstitute for Product Information and Residue AnalysisLeverkusenGermany

Personalised recommendations