Abstract
In these modern times, historical archaeology in North America is a recognized and acknowledged specialization or even discipline that can be separated from other types of archaeology. There now exists a Society for Historical Archaeology and there is an expanding literature on the subject in various journal articles, monographs, and books both in Canada and the United States. But it was not at all like this in 1934 when I studied American archaeology at the University of Michigan and thereby became a participant-observer in the development of archaeology, including historical archaeology, from that time to the present. And thus having been associated with certain aspects of historical archaeology for more than forty years and now being regarded by my grandchildren as one who has first-hand knowledge of the “olden days,” it seems fitting to reflect on some of the influences of my boyhood and youth that attracted me to the study of archaeology.
In retrospect, I believe my archaeological goals were basically humanistic rather than scientific. I was using archaeological methods to produce history and sometimes used simple scientific methods toward that end, but the ultimate goal was always history or perhaps ethnographic history. George I. Quimby
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Quimby, George, 1937, Notes on Indian Trade Silver Ornaments in Michigan. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 22:15–25.
Quimby, George, 1938, Dated Indian Burials in Michigan. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 23:63–74.
Quimby, George, 1939, European Trade Articles as Chronological Indicators for the Archaeology of the Historic Period in Michigan. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 24:25–35.
Quimby, George, 1942a, The Natchezan Culture Type. American Antiquity 7(3):255–275.
Quimby, George, 1942b, European Trade Objects in Michigan and Louisiana. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 27:543–551.
Quimby, George, 1957, The Bayou Goula Site, Iberville Parish, Louisiana. Fieldiana: Anthropology 47(2).
Quimby, George, 1961, The Pic River Site. In Lake Superior Copper and the Indians: Miscellaneous Studies of Great Lakes Prehistory, edited by James B. Griffin, pp. 83-89. Anthropological Papers Number 17, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
Quimby, George, 1966, Indian Culture and European Trade Goods; The Archaeology of the Historic Period in the Western Great Lakes Region. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Quimby, George and Alexander Spoehr, 1950, Historic Creek Pottery from Oklahoma. American Antiquity 15(3):249–251.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quimby, G.I. (1994). Historical Archaeology as I Saw It: 1935–1970. In: South, S. (eds) Pioneers in Historical Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0955-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0955-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0957-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0955-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive