Advertisement

Classifying Sexual Offenders

The Development and Corroboration of Taxonomic Models
  • Raymond A. Knight
  • Robert A. Prentky
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Classification is a fundamental cognitive operation. From the first perceptual contact with stimuli (Pomerantz, 1986; Treisman, 1986) through the ultimate integration and storage of information in long-term memory (Rosch & Lloyd, 1978), the identification, organization, and integration of elements that share common characteristics has been shown to be an essential component of perception and cognition. The critical function of classification in scientific investigation mirrors its central role in general cognition. Phenomenalists, realists, and con-ceptualists, despite their diverse metaphysical perspectives, all recognize the vital role of classification in science (Ghiselin, 1981). It stands as a necessary precursor and pervasive sustainer of all scientific progress (Hempel, 1965).

Keywords

Sexual Assault Social Competence Sexual Offender Interrater Reliability Sexual Aggression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 3rd ed. ). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J. V., Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., Murphy, W. D., and Coleman, E. (1978). Evaluating social skills of sexual aggressives. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blashfield, R. K. (1980). Propositions regarding the use of cluster analysis in clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 456–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, T. (1987). Classification: An overview of selected methodological issues. In D. M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry (Eds.). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 201–248 ). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantor, N., and Genero, N. (1986). Psychiatric diagnosis and natural categorization: A close analogy. In T. Millon and G. L. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSMIV (pp. 233–256 ). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cicchetti, D. V., and Sparrow, S. S. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications of assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, M. L., Seghorn, T., and Calmas, W. (1969). Sociometric study of sex offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 249–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, M. L., Garofalo, R. F., Boucher, R., and Seghorn, T. (1971). The psychology of rapists. Seminars in Psychiatry, 3, 307–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronbach, L. J., and Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelbrock, C. (1979). Mixture model tests of hierarchical clustering: The problem of classifying everybody. Multivariate Behavior Research, 14, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitch, J. H. (1962). Men convicted of sexual offenses against children: A descriptive follow-up study. British Journal of Criminology, 3 (1), 18–37.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, H. P., and Rubin, J. (1968). Logic of statistical procedures. In R. R. Grinker (Ed.), The borderline syndrome (pp. 53–72 ). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., and Christenson, C. V. (1965). Sex offenders: An analysis of types. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. Ghiselin, M. T. (1981). Categories, life, and thinking. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 269–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groth, A. N., and Birnbaum, H. J. (1979). Men who rape. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrow, M., and Westermeyer, J. F. (1987). Process-reactive dimension and outcome for narrow concepts of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 361–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Knight, R. A. (1988). A taxonomic analysis of child molesters. In R. A. Prentky and V. Quinsey (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (Vol. 528, 2–20 ). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. Knight, R. A. (1989). An assessment of the concurrent validity of a child molester typology. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knight, R. A., and Prentky, R. A. (1987). The developmental antecedents and adult adaptations of rapist subtypes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, R. A., and Roff, J. D. (1985). Affectivity in schizophrenia. In M. Alpert (Ed.), Controversies in schizophrenia (pp. 280–316 ). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Knight, R. A., Roff, J. D., Barrnett, J., and Moss, J. (1979). The concurrent and predictive validity of thought disorder and affectivity: A 22-year follow-up of acute schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight, R. A., Rosenberg, R., and Schneider, B. (1985). Classification of sexual offenders: Perspectives, methods and validation. IN A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook. (pp. 222–293 ). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Knight, R. A., Carter, D. L., and Prentky, R. A. (1989a). A system for the classification of child molesters. Reliability and application. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knight, R. A., Fleming, R., Ames, A., Straus, H., and Prentky, R. A. (1989b). Antisocial personality disorder and Hare assessments of psychopathy among sexual offenders. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  30. Marshall, W. L., Earls, C. M., Segal, Z., and Darke, J. (1983). A behavioral program for the assessment and treatment of sexual aggressors. In K. Craig and R. McMahon (Eds.), Advances in clinical behavior therapy (pp. 148–174 ). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  31. McCaghy, C. H. (1967). Child molesters: A study of their careers as deviants. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Meehl, P. E. (1957). When shall we use our heads instead of the formula? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meehl, P. E. (1959). Some ruminations on the validation of clinical procedures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 102–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meehl, P. E. (1979). A funny thing happened on the way to the latent entities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 564–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Megargee, E. I., and Bohn, M. J. (1979). Classifying criminal offenders. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error peturbation on fifteen clustering alogorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monahan, J. (1981). The clinical prediction of violent behavior, Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  39. Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In E. Schab and H. Nusbaum (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Visual perception (Vol. 2) (pp. 1–30 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Popper, K. R. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  41. Prentky, R. A., and Knight, R. A. (1986). Impulsivity in the lifestyle and criminal behavior of sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prentky, R. A., Lewine, R. R. J., Watt, N. F., and Fryer, J. H. (1980). A longitudinal study of psychiatric outcome, developmental variables vs. psychiatric symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 6, 139–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prentky, R. A., Cohen, M. L., and Seghorn, T. K. (1985). Development of a rational taxonomy for the classification of sexual offenders: Rapists. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 39–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Prentky, R. A., Burgess, A. W., and Carter, D. L. (1986). Victim responses by rapist type: An empirical and clinical analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A., and Rosenberg, R. (1988). Validation analyses on the MTC Taxonomy for Rapists: Disconfirmation and reconceptualization. In R. A. Prentky and V. Quinsey (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (Vol. 528, pp. 21–40 ). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  46. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A., Rosenberg, R., and Lee, A. (1989). A path analytic approach to the validation of a taxonomic system for classifying child molesters. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 5, 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A., and Lee, A. (1989). A twenty-five follow-up of sex offenders discharged from the Massachusetts Treatment Center. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  48. Rosch, E., and Lloyd, B. B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  49. Rosenberg, R., and Knight, R. A. (1988). Determining male sexual offender subtypes using cluster analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 383–410.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenberg, R., Knight, R. A., Prentky, R. A., and Lee, A. (1988). Validating the components of a taxonomic system for rapists: A path analytic approach. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 169–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Scully, D., and Marolla, J. (1985). Rape and vocabularies of motives: Alternative perspectives. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 294–312 ). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Seghorn, T. K. (1971). Adequacy of ego functioning in rapists and pedophiles (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University Graduate School, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 7613A–7614A.Google Scholar
  53. Seghorn, T., and Cohen, M. (1980). The psychology of the rape assailant. In W. Cerran, A. L. McGarry, and C. Petty (Eds.), Modern legal medicine, psychiatry, and forensic science (pp. 533–551 ). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  54. Skinner, H. A. (1981). Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 68–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Skinner, H. A. (1986). Construct validation approach to psychiatric classification. In T. Millon and G. L. Klerman (Eds.). Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSM-IV (pp. 307–330 ). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  56. Skinner, H. A., and Blashfield, R. K. (1982). Increasing the impact of cluster analysis research: The case of psychiatric classification. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 727–735.Google Scholar
  57. Skinner, L. J., and Becker, J. V. (1985). Sexual dysfunction and deviations. In M. Hersen and S. M. Turner (Eds.), Diagnostic Interviews (pp. 205–242 ). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114b-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whitman, W. P., and Quinsey, V. L. (1981). Heterosocial skill training for institutionalized rapists and child molesters. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond A. Knight
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert A. Prentky
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.Research DepartmentMassachusetts Treatment CenterBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations