Advertisement

Assessment and Modification of Cognitive Distortions in Sex Offenders

  • William D. Murphy
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Sexual aggression against children and adults is being recognized both by professionals and by the public as a significant problem for society (Badgley, 1984; Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987; Russell, 1982). In an attempt to address the problem, there have been attempts to more fully understand the individuals who perpetuate such abuse and to determine relevant target areas for treatment. This literature has produced numerous descriptive studies, personality assessment studies, and classification systems which have been well-reviewed previously (Knight, Rosenberg, & Schneider, 1985; Levin & Stava, 1987; Murphy & Stalgaitis, 1987; Prentky, Cohen, & Seghorn, 1985; Quinsey, 1984, 1986). All of these approaches provide some understanding of sex offenders, although they do not always clearly translate into specific treatment programs.

Keywords

Sexual Offense Cognitive Distortion Sexual Aggression Rape Myth Child Molester 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., and Becker, J. V. (1978). An integrated treatment program for rapists. In: R. T. Rada (Ed.), Clinical aspects of the rapist (pp. 161–214 ). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  2. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., Kaplan, M., and Reich, J. (1984). The treatment of child molesters. (Available from G. G. Abel, Behavior Medicine Institute, 5791 Kingston Cross, Stone Mountain, GA 30087 ).Google Scholar
  3. Badgley, R. F. (1984). Sexual offenses against children: A report of the committee on sexual offenses against children and youth. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Briere, J., Malamuth, N., and Check, J. V. P. (1985). Sexuality and rape-supportive beliefs. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 398–403.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Check, J. V. P., and Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Check, J. V. P., and Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Can there be positive effects of participation in pornographic experiments? The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conte, J. R. (1985). Clinical dimensions of adult sexual abuse of children. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 341–354.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, A., and Grieger, R. (1977). Handbook of rational-emotive therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, G. L. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible date rape: Changes after taking a human sexuality course. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 12, 42–46.Google Scholar
  13. Gore, D. K. (1988). Cognitive distortions of child molesters and the cognition scale: Reliability, validity, treatment effects, and prediction of recidivism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  14. Knight, R. A., Rosenberg, R., and Schneider, B. A. (1985). Classification of sexual offenders: Perspectives, methods, and validation. In: A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault (pp. 222–293 ). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  15. Knopp, F. H. (1984). Retraining adult sex offenders: Methods and models. Syracuse NY: Safer Society Press.Google Scholar
  16. Koss, M. P., and Dinero, T. E. ( 1987, January). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Paper presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Human Sexual Aggression: Current Perspectives, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., and Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discrimi- nant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., and Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
  19. Lange, A. (1986). Rational-emotive therapy: A treatment manual. Tampa, FL: Florida Mental Health Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Levin, S. M., and Stava, L. (1987). Personality characteristics of sex offenders: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 57–79.Google Scholar
  21. Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Factors associated with rape as predictors of laboratory aggression against women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 432–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Aggression against women: Cultural and individual causes. In: N. M. Malamuth and E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 19–52 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malamuth, N. M., and Check, J. V. P. (1980). Penile tumescence and perceptual responses to rape as a function of victim’s perceived reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 428–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malamuth, N. M., and Check, J. V. P. (1984). Debriefing effectiveness following exposure to pornographic rape depictions. The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malamuth, N. M., Haber, S., and Feshbach, S. (1980). Testing hypotheses regarding rape: Exposure to sexual violence, sex differences, and the “normality” of rapists. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, W. D., and Barbaree, H. E. (1987). Assessments of sexual offenders by measures of erectile response: Psychometric properties and decision making (Order #86M0506500501D). Rockville MD: National Institute of Health.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, W. D., Coleman, E. M., and Haynes, M. R. (1983). Treatment and evaluation issues with the mentally retarded sex offender. In: J. G. Greer and I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 22–41 ). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, W. D., Coleman, E. M., and Haynes, M. R. (1986). Factors related to coercive sexual behavior in a nonc1inca1 sample of males. Violence and Victims, 1, 255–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy, W. D., and Stalgaitis, S. J. (1987). Assessment and treatment considerations for sexual offenders against children: Behavioral and social learning approaches. In: J. R. McNamara and M. A. Appel (Eds.), Critical issues, developments, and trends in professional psychology (vol. 3; pp. 177–210 ). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, H. R., and Molinder, I. (1984). Multiphasic Sex Inventory Manual. Tacoma WA: Authors.Google Scholar
  33. Prentky, R., Cohen, M., and Seghorn, T. (1985). Development of a rational taxonomy for the classification of rapists: The Massachusetts Treatment Center system. Bulletin of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 39–70.Google Scholar
  34. Quinsey, V. L. (1984). Sexual aggression: Studies of offenders against women. In: D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (vol. 1; pp. 84–121 ). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  35. Quinsey, V. L. (1986). Men who have sex with children. In D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (vol. 2; pp. 140–172 ). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  36. Rapaport, K., and Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rouleau, J. L., Abel, G. G., Mittelman, M. S., Becker, J. V., and Cunningham-Rathner, J. ( 1986, February). Effectiveness of each component of a treatment program for non-incarcerated pedophiles. Paper presented at the NIMH-sponsored Conference on Sex Offenders, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, D. E. H. (1982). The prevalence and incidence of forcible rape and attempted rape of females. Victimology: An International Journal, 7, 81–93.Google Scholar
  39. Stermac, L., and Segal, Z. ( 1987, November). Cognitive assessment of child molesters. Paper presented at the 21st annual convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Boston.Google Scholar
  40. Tieger, T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolf, S. C. ( 1984, November). A multi factor model of deviant sexuality. Paper presented at the Third National Conference on Victimology, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  42. Yochelson, S., and Samenow, S. E. (1977). The criminal personality. Vol. II: The change process. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • William D. Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TennesseeMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations