Advertisement

Pooling of Data from Independent Studies

  • Peter G. Kaufmann
Part of the The Springer Series in Behavioral Psychophysiology and Medicine book series (SSBP)

Abstract

The large-scale, randomized clinical trial is generally regarded as a standard against which the credibility of other clinical investigations is evaluated. This is especially true if the effects to be studied are small or occur infrequently, and the trial has been conducted with a sample size sufficient to determine unequivocally the presence or absence of an effect. Increased sample size, or power, is therefore one immediately apparent reason for pooling data from several independent studies. This was the case in a study of several randomized trials comparing streptokinase therapy and heparin anticoagulation for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (Goldhaber, Buring, Lipnick, & Hennikens, 1984). Pooling of results from several studies indicated a significant advantage of streptokinase treatment over heparin, but also revealed a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding complications for that treatment. Although the results of pooling could not resolve these questions of efficacy and safety, they did succeed in demonstrating a likelihood that a large-scale clinical trial would be able to do so. Pooling has also been used to extend the interpretation of data beyond the original aims of the individual studies, such as in explicating the relationship of risk factors to the incidence of coronary heart disease (Pooling Project Research Group, 1978), or to resolve ambiguous outcomes, as in evaluating the prophylactic efficacy of β-blockers after myocardial infarction (Bassan, Shalev, & Eliakim, 1984). However, because of the statistical nature of the benefits of pooling, it is not possible to use this approach to resolve truly conflicting results. That is, when several studies show statistically opposite outcomes, it is unlikely that these were caused by chance variations in the data, and the source of disagreement cannot be resolved by statistical techniques. These studies must be examined in detail to identify possible differences in experimental design, subject population, or other factors which may have affected the dynamics of the system under study. Finally, pooling can serve as an excellent vehicle for the detailed review of existing empirical or clinical procedures. The process of pooling data from independent studies can be a worthwhile and scholarly effort, likely to lead to new insights as well as the formulation of new hypotheses, provided appropriate cautions and limitations are kept in mind.

Keywords

Deep Venous Thrombosis Data Entry Statistical Concern Major Bleeding Complication Heparin Anticoagulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bassan, M. M., Shalev, O., & Eliakim, A. (1984). Improved prognosis during long-term treatment after myocardial infarction: Analysis of randomized trials and pooling of results. Heart and Lung, 13, 164–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dolan, P. M. (1981). Invited editorial: Toward meeting the scientific, technological and financial challenges of the 1980’s. Psychophysiology, 18, 514–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & DeMets, D. L. (1985). Fundamentals of clinical trials. Littleton, MA: PSG Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Goldhaber, S. Z., Buring, J. E., Lipnick, R. J., & Hennikens, C. H. (1984). Pooled analyses of randomized trials of streptokinase and heparin in phlebographically documented acute deep venous thrombosis. American Journal of Medicine, 76, 393–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufmann, P. G., Jacob, R. G., Ewart, C. K., Chesney, M. A., Muenz, L. R., Doub, N., Mercer, W., & HIPP Investigators (1988). Hypertension Intervention Pooling Project. Health Psychology, 7 (Suppl.), 209–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lipid Research Clinics Program (1984). The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. II. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. Journal of the American Medical Association, 251, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. May, G. S., DeMets, D. L., Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C., & Passamani, E. (1981). The randomized clinical trial: Bias in analysis. Circulation, 64, 669–673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pooling Project Research Group (1978). Relationship of blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking habit, relative weight and ECG abnormalities to incidence of major coronary events: Final report of the Pooling Project. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 31, 201–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter G. Kaufmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Medicine BranchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations