Diaries in Ambulatory Monitoring

  • Margaret A. Chesney
  • Gail H. Ironson
Part of the The Springer Series in Behavioral Psychophysiology and Medicine book series (SSBP)


Ambulatory monitoring equipment frees the clinician and research scientist from the confines of the clinic and laboratory settings and permits the assessment of physiological parameters in the natural environment. There is increasing evidence that ambulatory monitoring provides a more representative assessment of an individual’s functioning than that afforded by standard clinic and laboratory measurements. Moreover, ambulatory monitoring is an opportunity to study interactions between physiological functioning and characteristics of the individual’s environment or behavior. These interactions are of interest because they may shed light on the marked variability in physiological measurements that is often observed. To examine these interactions, it is necessary to record information about the subject’s behavior and environment at the time ambulatory physiological measurements are made. Typically, the subject records this information in a diary throughout the monitoring period.


Mood State Behavioral Medicine Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Neutral Point Diary Entry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5 th ed.). New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, E. B. (1981). Behavioral assessment of psychophysiologic disorders. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Behavioral assessment of adult disorders (pp. 239–270). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ciminero, A. R., Nelson, R. O., & Lipinski, D. P. (1977). Self-monitoring procedures. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment: Self-monitoring procedures (pp. 195–232). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, L. A., Denby, L., Pregibon, D., Harshfield, G. A., Pickering, T. G., Blank, S., & Laragh, J. H. (n. d.). A data based method for bivariate outlier detection: Application to automatic blood pressure recording devices. Unpublished paper, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Condiotte, M. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1981). Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 648–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, R. L, Hansen, W. B., & Mittlemark, M. B. (1977). Increasing the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior in children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 521–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gellman, M., Ironson, G., Spitzer, S., Keenan, M., Schneiderman, N., & Weidler, D. (1986, November). Ambulatory blood pressure as a function of race, gender, place, and mood. Paper presented at the American Heart Association meeting, Dallas.Google Scholar
  10. Gomella, L. G., Braen, G. R., & Olding, M. J. (1983). Clinician’s pocket reference (4th ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton.Google Scholar
  11. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Hartman, D. P., & Wood, D. D. (1982). Observational methods. In A. S. Bellack, M. Hersen, and A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (pp. 109–138). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanfer, F. (1970). Self-monitoring: Methodological limitations and clinical application. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kazdin, A. E. (1974). Reactive self-monitoring: The effects of response desirability, goal setting, and feedback. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 704–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawrence, P. S. (1982). Behavioral assessment of sleep disorders. In F. J. Keefe & J. A. Blumenthal (Eds.), Assessment strategies in behavioral medicine (pp. 197–221). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  17. Llabre, M. M., Ironson, G. H., Spitzer, S. B., & Schneiderman, N. (n. d.). How many blood pressure measurements is enough? An application of generalizability to the study of blood pressure reliability. Unpublished paper, University of Miami.Google Scholar
  18. McFall, R. M. (1977). Parameters of self-monitoring. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.), Behavioral self-management: Strategies, techniques, and outcome (pp. 196–214). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, R. O. (1977). Methodological issues in assessment via self-monitoring. In J. D. Cone & R. P. Hawkins (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: New directions in clinical psychology (pp. 217–240). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson, R. O., Lipinski, D. P., & Black, J. L. (1976). The relative reactivity of external observations and self-monitoring. Behavior Therapy, 7, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Orleans, C. S., & Shipley, R. H. (1982). Assessment in smoking cessation research: Some practical guidelines. In F. J. Keefe & J. A. Blumenthal (Eds.), Assessment strategies in behavioral medicine (pp. 261–317). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  23. Pickering, T. G., Harshfield, G. A., Kleinert, H. D., Blank, S., & Laragh, J. H. (1982). Blood pressure during normal activities, sleep and exercise: Comparison of values in normal and hypertensive subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 247, 992–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rebecca, G. S., Wayne, R. R., Campbell, S., Rocco, M., Nabel, E., Barry, J., & Selwyn, A. P. (1986, March). Transient ischemia in coronary disease is associated with mental arousal during daily life. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Scientific Session, American College of Cardiology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  25. Romanczyk, K. (1974). Self-monitoring in the treatment of obesity: Parameters of reactivity. Behavior Therapy, 5, 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roskies, E., Seraganian, P., Oseasohn, R., Hanley, J. A., Collu, R., Martin, N., & Smilga, C. (1986). The Montreal type A intervention project: Major findings. Health Psychology, 5, 45–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schang, S. J., & Pepine, C. J. (1977). Transient asymptomatic S-T segment depression during daily activity. American Journal of Cardiology, 39, 396–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sjoden, P. O., Bates, S., & Nyren, O. (1983). Continuous selfrecording of epigastric pain with two rating scales: Compliance, authenticity, reliability, and sensitivity. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 5, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  30. Southard, D. R., Coates, T. J., Kolodner, K., Parker, F. C., Padgett, N. E., & Kennedy, H. L. (1986). Relationship between mood and blood pressure in the natural environment: An adolescent population. Health Psychology, 5, 469–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thoresen, C. E., & Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Tzivoni, D., Gavish, A., Benhorin, J., Keren, A., & Stern, S. (1986). Myocardial ischemia during daily activities and stress. American Journal of Cardiology, 58, 47B–50B.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Egeren, L., & Madarasmi, S. (n. d.). A computerized diary for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Unpublished paper, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  34. Ward, M. M., & Chesney, M. A. (1985). Diagnostic interviewing for psychophysiological disorders. In M. Hersen & S. M. Turner (Eds.), Diagnostic interviewing (pp. 261–285). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret A. Chesney
    • 1
  • Gail H. Ironson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, School of MedicineUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations