Does the Bioprogram Affect Second-Language Acquisition?
During the last 10 years, second-language scholars have looked to the field of pidgin and creole studies for insights into language acquisition. Among the important theories to emerge from this interdisciplinary effort are Schumman’s (1978) Pidginization Hypothesis and Andersen’s (1983) Nativization Hypothesis. The present study considers the implications for second-language acquisition of perhaps the most controversial hypothesis in pidgin—creole scholarship: Bickerton’s Bioprogram Hypothesis.
KeywordsNoun Phrase Language Acquisition Child Language Nativization Hypothesis Early Sensitivity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersen, R. (1983). Introduction:A language acquisition interpretation of pidginization and creolization. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 1–56 ). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
- Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bresson, F. (1974). Remarks on genetic psycholinguistics: The acquisition of the article system in French. Problemes actuels en psycholinguistique (pp. 67–72 ). Paris: Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Emslie, H. C., & Stevenson, R. J. (1981). Preschool children’s use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language, 8, 313–328..Google Scholar
- Gilbert, G. (1983). Transfer in second language acquisition. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 168–180 ). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
- Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
- Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979) A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Maratsos, M. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Meisel, J. (1983). Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one type of simplification. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 120–157 ). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
- Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
- Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175–208 ). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Slobin, D. I. (1985). Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1159–1249 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar