In the last few years, several new techniques became suitable for the treatment of ureteral stones, increasing the methods already available. The indications for each treatment are based on a number of parameters: size and hardness of the stone; position of the stone in the ureter; presence of dilation or a non-functioning kidney; duration of stone in position. In order to assess which treatment is most appropriate for each stone, we reviewed our experience from January, 1985 until March, 1988.
KeywordsUreteral Stone Ureteral Calculus Dormia Basket Ureteral Wall Auxiliary Measure
- 1.A Mandressi, G Zanetti, M Ruoppolo, P Tombolimi, G Dormia, G Donizzetti, and E Pisani, Ureteral stone management: our experience, Arch. It. Urol. 60:29 (1988).Google Scholar
- 2.K Miller and R Hautmann, ESWL of distal ureteral calculi. A new approach, in: “IVth World Congr. Endourology and ESWL”, Madrid (1986), Abstr. 199.Google Scholar
- 3.E Pisani, P Tombolini, A Mandressi, M Ruoppolo, G Zanetti, A Trinchieri, G Dormia, A Cazzaniga, and G Longo, La litotrissia elettroidraulica (EHL) nel trattamento della calcolosi ureterale, Acta Urol. Ital. 0:107 (1986).Google Scholar
- 4.G Zanetti, M Ruoppolo, and E Pisani, Trattamento ESWL: due anni di esperienza, Arch. It. Urol. LX:285 (1988).Google Scholar