Skip to main content

Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: How Much is Enough?

  • Chapter
Urolithiasis
  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

Over 300,000 patients worldwide have received shock-wave treatment for their renal or ureteral stones. There seems to be little question that this method of minimally-invasive treatment of calculi (1) is as effective as open surgery or percutaneous procedures when used on properly-selected patients (2). On the other hand, the major benefit attributed to shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) derives from its relative lack of morbidity and similar cost when compared to percutaneous renal stone surgery (3). Of course, some patients require treatment by combined modalities such as ESWL coupled with percutaneous lithotripsy (4). Few now undergo classical open surgery for renal stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. GW Drach, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a surgical operation, albeit noninvasive (Letter to the Editor), J. Urol. In press (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. GW Drach, Surgical overview of urolithiasis, J. Urol. In press (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. JE Lingeman, RM Saywell, Jr., JR Woods, and DM Newman, Cost analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy relative to other surgical and nonsurgical treatment alternatives for urolithiasis, Medical Care 24:1151 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J Rassweiler, R Gumpinger, K Miller, F Holzermann, and F Eisenberger, Multimodal treatment (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease, European Urol. 12:294 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. RC Newman and B. Finlayson, New developments in ESWL, Am. Urol. Assoc. Update Series, 7:50 (Vol. VII) (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. GW Drach, S Dretler, W Fair, B Finlayson, J Gillenwater, D Griffith, J Lingeman, and D Newman, Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J. Urol. 135:1127 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C Chaussy, “Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.” Ernst Kieser GmbH, Augsburg, West Germany (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. JE Lingeman, D Newman, JH Mertz, PG Mosbaugh, RE Steele, RJ Kahnoski, TA Coury, and JR Woods, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience, J. Urol. 135(6):1134 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N Papanicolaou, SA Stafford, RC Pfister, AF Althausen, and SP Dretler, Significant renal hemorrhage following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: imaging and clinical features, Radiol. 163:661 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JM Donovan, S Gunasekaran, and GW Drach, Changes in rabbit renal physiology following extracorporeal shock wave treatment, Submitted to J. Urol. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. CM Williams, JR Kaude, RC Newman, JC Peterson, and WC Thomas, Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: long-term complications, Am. J. R. 150:311 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G Haupt, A Haupt, JM Donovan, GW Drach, and C Chaussy, Short term changes of laboratory values after ESWLR, Submitted to J. Urol. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. JE Lingeman, TA Coury, DM Newman, RJ Kahnoski, JH Mertz, PG Mosbaugh, RE Steele, and JR Woods, Nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J. Urol. 138:485 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MA Al Karawi, AR Mohammed, EE El-Etaibi, MS Abomelha, and RF Seed, Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL)-induced erosions in upper gastrointestinal tract, Urology 30:224 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AS Cass and GR Onstad, Colonic injury with ESWLR for an upper ureteral calculus, J. Urol. 139:376A (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. RP Lusk and RS Tyler, Hazardous sound levels produced by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J. Urol. 137(6):1113 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. FL Van Swearingen, DL McCullough, R Dyer, and B Appel, Radiation exposure to patients during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J. Urol. 138(1):18 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. TR Morgan, VP Laudone, WDW Heston, L Zeitz, and WR Fair, Free radical production by high energy shock waves-comparison with ionizing irradiation, J. Urol. 139:186 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. PT Hunter, B Finlayson, RJ Hirko, WC Voreck, R Walker, S Walck, and M Nasr, Measurement of shock wave pressures used for lithotripsy, J. Urol. 136:733 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. GW Drach and C Chaussy, Particle size and excretion after shock-wave lithotripsy: when is stone destruction adequate? Presented at the Annual Meeting Am. Urol. Assoc, New Orleans (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. RA Riehle, Jr., HB Carter, and ED Vaughan, Jr., Quantitative and crystallographic analysis of stone fragments voided after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J. Endourol. 1:37 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. SP Dretler, Stone fragility-a new therapeutic distinction, J. Urol. 139:1124 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. AD Randolph and MA Larson, “Theory of Particulate Processes,” Academic Press, San Diego (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. B Hiske, Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S Murata, H Watanabe, T Takahashi, K Watanabi, and H Furue, Studies on the application of microexplosion to medicine and biology. II. Construction and strength of urinary calculi, Japanese J. Urol. 68:249 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R Thomas, B Sloane, and J Roberts, Effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on renal function, J. Urol. 139:323A (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. K Ison, Physical and technical introduction to lithotripsy, in: “Lithotripsy II,” MJ Coptcoat, RA Miller, and JEA Wickham, eds., BDI Publishing, London (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J Graff, A Schmidt, J Pastor, D Herberhold, J Rassweiler, and U Hankemeier, New generator for low pressure lithotripsy with the Dornier HM3: preliminary experience of 2 centers, J. Urol. 139:904 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drach, G.W. (1989). Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: How Much is Enough?. In: Walker, V.R., Sutton, R.A.L., Cameron, E.C.B., Pak, C.Y.C., Robertson, W.G. (eds) Urolithiasis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0873-5_289

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0873-5_289

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0875-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0873-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics