Advertisement

Urolithiasis pp 465-467 | Cite as

Comparison of Urine Composition in Male Patients Forming Calcium Stones of Different Types

  • L. Larsson
  • S. Öhman
  • H.-G. Tiselius

Abstract

Stone formation is considered to be determined by a combination of several etiological factors, such as supersaturation and activity of promoters and inhibitors (1). Calcium oxalate (CaOx) is the main component of renal stones in industrialized countries. If insensitive analytical methods are used, many of these stones may be considered as “pure” CaOx although as much as 20% w/w may be calcium phosphate (CaP) (2). We use a sensitive wetchemical method for analysis of urinary calculi (3). In this study, we compare urinary excretions and concentrations of components suspected to affect stone formation in male patients forming calcium stones of different composition. We also compare these stone patients with a reference group of non-stone-formers.

Keywords

Stone Formation Calcium Oxalate Renal Stone Urinary Calculus Calcium Oxalate Stone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CYC Pak, “Calcium Urolithiasis, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management,” Plenum Press, New York (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L Larsson, B Sörbo, H-G Tiselius, and S Öhman, On the analysis of urinary calculi, in: “Urinary Calculus”, JG Brockis and B Finlayson, eds., PSG Publishing Co., Littletown, MA (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L Larsson, B Sorbo, H-G Tiselius, and S Öhman, A method for quantitative wet chemic analysis of urinary calculi, Clin. Chim. Acta 140: 9 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H-G Tiselius, An improved method for the routine biochemical evaluation of patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stone disease, Clin. Chim. Acta 122: 409 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WG Robertson, M Peacock, PJ Heyburn, DH Marshall, and PB Clark, Risk factors in calcium stone disease of urinary tract, Br. J. Urol. 50: 449 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H Fleisch, Mechanisms of stone formation: role of promoters and inhibitors, Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl. 53: 53 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L Larsson, B Sörbo, H-G Tiselius, and S Öhman, Wet chemical analysis of small (<20 mg) urinary calculi, in: “Urinary Stone. Proceedings of the Second Urinary Stone Conference, Singapore, 1983”, RL Ryall, JH Brockis, VR Marshall, and B Finlayson, eds., Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S Öhman, L Larsson, and H-G Tiselius, What is renal stone matrix? in: this volume, p. 165.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PG Koutsokos, ME Sheehan, and GH Nancollas, Epitaxial considerations in urinary stone formation II. The oxalate-phosphate system, Invest. Urol. 18: 358 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Larsson
    • 1
  • S. Öhman
    • 1
  • H.-G. Tiselius
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Clinical Chemistry and UrologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations