Advertisement

Discourse Analysis and Embedding Depth of Utterances: Clause Analysis Technique as a Measure of Complexity

  • Ghaida Salah

Abstract

Clause analysis is a technique for measuring structural complexity. The significance of this measurement lies in its applicability to both written and spoken discourse. The clause analysis technique was first developed by W.A. Cook in 1969, and later expanded by Arena (1975).

Keywords

Embed Clause Main Clause Communicative Competence Subordinate Clause Embed Depth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Arena, L. 1982. The language of corporate attorneys. In Di Pietro, 1982b. [Ed.] Linguistics and the professions: advances in discourse processes. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 143–154.Google Scholar
  2. Arena, L. 1975. Linguistics and Composition. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bever, T., Lackner, S., and Kirk, R. 1974. The underlying structures of sentences. In Harman, G., 1974. On Noam Chomsky: critical essays. New York: Anchor Books. 118–145.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, H.D. 1980. Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Canale M., and Swain, M. 1979. Communication approaches to second language teaching and testing. Review and Evaluation Bulletin 1 (5).Google Scholar
  6. Clark, H., and Clark, E. 1977. Psychology and language: an introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, Walter A. 1969. Introduction to tagmemic analysis. Trans-Atlantic series in linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Corder, S.P. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dulay, H. and Burt, M. 1977. Remark on creativity in language acquisition. In M. Burt, H. Dulay, and M. Finnochiaro (Eds.) Viewpoints on English as a Second Language. New York: Regents. pp. 95–126.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, R. and Lambert, W. 1972. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  11. Lantolf, J. (Forthcoming). Experiencing silent way at the university.Google Scholar
  12. Mellon, John C. 1967. Transformational sentence-combining: A method for enhancing the development of syntactic fluency in English composition. United States Office of Education Cooperative Research Project No. 5-8418. Cambridge, Mass., Graduate School of Education, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Schachter, J. 1974. An Error in Error Analysis. Language Learning, 24, 2, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghaida Salah
    • 1
  1. 1.Al-Najah UniversityNablus, West BankJordan

Personalised recommendations