Advertisement

Chemical Sense of Dolphins: Quasi-Olfaction

  • Vitaly B. Kuznetzov
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 196)

Abstract

Vertebrates possess two types of chemoreception-olfaction and taste. The distinction between these senses is often believed to be determined by different media of perception. While the olfaction perceives chemicals in the gaseous state, the taste perception takes place when the receptor contacts with the dissolved chemicals. But it is the seeming difference. Fish perceive the chemical solutions both by olfaction and taste. The sensitivity of both senses is higher in fish than in terrestrial vertebrates (Kleerekoper, 1969; Atema, 1980).

Keywords

Olfactory Epithelium Bottlenose Dolphin Chemical Stimulus Harbor Porpoise Taste Sensitivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarkov, G. B., and Gilevich, S. A., 1979, On the question of chemoreception by dolphins, Vestnik Zoologii, 3:3 (Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Amundin, M.; and Andersen, S. H., 1983, Bony nares air pressure and nasal plug muscle activity during click production in the harbor porpoise, Phocoena and the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, J. Exp. Biol., 105:275.Google Scholar
  3. Arvy, L., and Pilleri, G., 1970, The tongue of Platanista qangetica and remarks on the cetacea tongue, in: “Investigations on Cetacea”, Vol. 2, G. Pilleri, ed., Berne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. Atema, J., 1980, Chemical senses, chemical signals, and feeding behavior in fishes, in: “Fish behavior and its use in the capture and culture of fishes”, J. E. Bardach, J. J. Magnuson, R. C. May, J. M. Reinhart, eds., Manila.Google Scholar
  5. Au, W. W. L., Floyd, R. G., Penner, R. H., and Murchison, A. E., 1974, Measurement of echolocation signals of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. Montagu, in open waters, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 56:1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belousova, T. A., Devitsina, G. V., and Malyukina, G. A., 1983, Functional peculiarities of fish trigeminal system, Chemical Senses, 8 N 2:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berzin, A. A., 1971, “Sperm whale”, Pisch. promishlennost, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  8. Breathnach, A. S., 1953, The olfactory tubercule, prepyriform cortex and precommissural region of the porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). J. Anat., 87:96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Breathnach, A. S., 1960, The cetacean central nervous system, Biol. Rev., 35:187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dart, R., 1923, The brain of the Zeuglodontidae, Proc. Zool. Soc., London, p. 615.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, B. I., 1977, The tongue of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), in: “Functional anatomy of marine mammals”, R. Harrison, ed., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Edinger, T., 1955, Hearing and smell in cetacean history, Monatsch. Psychiat. Neurol., 129:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filimonov, I. N., 1949, “Comparative anatomy of the cerebral cortex of mammals. Paleocortex, Archicortex, and Intermediate Cortex”, Publ. Acad. Med. Sei., Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  14. Filimonov, I. N., 1965, On the so-called Rhinencephalon in the dolphin, J. Hirnforsch., 8:1.Google Scholar
  15. Gellerman, L. W., 1933, Chance ordr of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments, J. Genet. Psychol., 42:207.Google Scholar
  16. Giachetti, J. and MacLeod, P., 1977, Olfactory input to the thalamus: evidence for ventroposteromedial projection, Brain Res., 125:166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilevitch, S. A., 1978, Histostructure of papillae of fetuses and neonates bottlenose dolphins, in: “Abstracts of Reports of the Seventh All-Union conference, Simferopol”, (Russian).Google Scholar
  18. Glass, G. V., and Stanley, J. C., 1970, “Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology”, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  19. Grachova, M. S., 1971, Some peculiarities of the structure of the bottlenose dolphin, Zoolocricheskii Zhurnal, 50:1539 (Russian).Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, M. S., Morgane, J., and McFarland, W., 1971, The anatomy of the brain of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), Rhinic Lobe (Rhinencephalon) 1. The paleocortex, J. Comp. Neurol., 141:205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kashiwayanagi, M., and Kurihara, K., 1984, Neuroblastoma cell as model for olfactory cell: mechanism of depolarization in response to various odorants, Brain Res., 293:251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleereloper, H., 1969, “Olfaction in Fish”, Pergamon Press, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Kleynenberg, S. E., Yablokov, A. V., Bel’kovich, V. M., and Tarasevich, M. N., 1964, “Beluga”, Nauka, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  24. Koyama, N. and Kurihara, K., 1972, Effect of odorants on lipid monolayers from olfactory epithelium, Nature, 236:402.Google Scholar
  25. Kumazawa, T., Kashiwayanagi, M., and Kurihara, K., 1985, Neuroblastoma cell as a model for a taste cell: mechanism of depolarization in response to various bitter substances, Brain Res., 333:27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurihara, Y., 1973, Effect of taste stimuli on the extraction of lipids from bovine taste papillae, Biochem.Biophys. Acta, 306: 478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1974, A method of studying chemoreception in the Black Sea bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), in: “Morphology, Physiology and Acoustic of Marine Mammals”, Nauka, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1978a, Chemical communication and ability of bottlenose dolphins to send information about chemical stimulus, in: “Marine Mammals. Results and Methods of Investigation”, Nauka, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  29. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1978b, The peculiarities of functioning of the upper respiratory tract under water, in: “Abstracts of Reports of the Seventh All-Union Conference, Simferopol”, (Russian).Google Scholar
  30. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1979, Chemoreception in dolphins of the Black Sea: bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus), common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) and common porpoise (Phocoena), Dokl. Acad. Nauk. SSSR, 49:1498 (Russian).Google Scholar
  31. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1982, Taste perception of sea lions, in: “Abstracts of Reports of the Eighth, All-Union Conference, Astrakhan”. (Russian).Google Scholar
  32. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1984, Chemoreception of dolphins, “Avtoredferat dissertatsii kand. biol. nauk”, Moscow. (Russian).Google Scholar
  33. Kuznetsov, V. B., 1986, Chemical sense in dolphins, in: “Chemical Communication of Animals. Theory and Experience”, Nauka, Moscow. (Russian)Google Scholar
  34. Langworthy, O. R., 1932, A discription of the central nervous system of the porpoise (Tursiops truncatus), J. Comp.Neur., 54:437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawika, W. D., 1969, Differing effectiveness of auditory quality and location cues in the form of differentiation learning, Acta bioloaiae expérimentale, 29: N 1.Google Scholar
  36. Lawrence, B., and Schevill, W. E., 1965, Gular musculature in delphininds, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 133:1.Google Scholar
  37. Liley, N. R., 1982, Chemical communication in fish, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sei., 39:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowell, W. R., and Flanigan Ir. W. F., 1980, Marine Mammal chemoreception, Mammal Rev.., 10:53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li Yuemin, 1983, The tongue of Baiji, Acta zool. sin., 29:35.Google Scholar
  40. Matthes, E., 1927, Der Finfluss des medium-wechsels auf das Geruchsvermögen von Triton, Z. Vercrl. Phsiol., 5, N 1:83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mchedlidze, G. A., 1964, “Cetacean Paleospecies of the Caucasus” Metsniereba, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  42. Millhouse, O. E., 1987, Granule cells of the olfactory tubercle and the question of the island so Calleja, J.Comp. Neurol., 265:1.Google Scholar
  43. Moulton, D. G., 1976, Olfaction in mammals, Am. Zool., 7:421.Google Scholar
  44. Nachtigall, P. E., and Hall, R. W., 1982, Taste reception in bottlenose dolphin. in: “Third international theriological congress. Helsinki, Abstracts of papers”, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  45. Oelschläger, H., and Buhl, E. H., 1985, Development and rudimentation of the habor porpoise, Phocoena (Mammalia: Cetacea), J. Morphol. 184:360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parker, G. H., 1922, “Smell, Taste and Allied Senses in Vertebrates”, Lippincott, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silver, W. L., and Marunial, J. A., 1981, Trigeminal chemoreception in the nasal and oral cavities, Chemical Senses, 6, N 4:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sinclair, J. G., 1966, The olfactory complex of dolphin embryos, Texas Rep. Biol. Med., 24:426.Google Scholar
  49. Sokolov, V. E., and Kuznetsov, V. B., 1971, Chemoreception in the Black Sea dolphin (Tursiops truncatus Mont.), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 204:998 (Russian).Google Scholar
  50. Sokolov, V. E., and Volkova, O. V., 1971, The structure of the tongue in dolphins, in: “Morphology and Ecology of Marine Mammals”, Nauka, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  51. Sonntag, C. F., 1922, The comparative anatomy of the tongues of the Mammalia, VII, Cetacea, Sirenia, and Ungulata, Proc. Zool. Soc., London, p. 639.Google Scholar
  52. Suchowskaja, L. I., 1972, The morphology of the taste organs in dolphins, in: “Invest. Cetacea. Vol. 4”, Berne.Google Scholar
  53. Talbot, K., Woolf, N. J. and Butcher, L. L., 1988, Feline islands of Calleja complex: II. cholinergic and cholinesterasic features, J. Com. Neurol., 275:580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turner, W., 1891, The convolutions of the brain: a study in comparative anatomy, J. Anat. Physiol., 25:105.Google Scholar
  55. Valiulina, F. G., and Khomenko, B. G., 1976, Micromorphology of the tongue receptor system in Tursiops truncatus, Zooloaicheskii Zhurnal, 55:467.Google Scholar
  56. Yamasaki, F., Satomi, H., and Kamiya, T., 1976, The tongue of Franciscana (La Plata dolphin) Pontoporia blainvillei, Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, 53:77.Google Scholar
  57. Yamasaki, F., Komatsu, S., and Kamiya, T., 1978, Taste buds in the pits at the posterior dorsum of the tongue of Stenella coeruleoalba. in: “Sei. Rep. Whales Res. Int. Tokyo”, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  58. Yablokov, A. V., 1961, About “the olfction” in marine mammals, in: Trudy Soveshchaniy Ikhtiologicheskoj Komissii A. N. SSSR, 12:87. Publ. AN SSSR, Moscow (Russian).Google Scholar
  59. Zvegintseva, E. G., 1986, Structural organization and connections of cellular ensembles of the cat cerebral olfactory tubercle, Archiv anatomy histology i embriology, 40, N 5:5 (Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vitaly B. Kuznetzov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vertebrate Zoology Faculty of BiologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations