Advertisement

High Intensity Narwhal Clicks

  • Bertel Møhl
  • Annemarie Surlykke
  • Lee A. Miller
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 196)

Abstract

The hypothesis that some odontocetes use their sonar not only to find prey, but also to debilitate it (Norris and Møhl, 1983) requires that odontocetes produce sound pressures in excess of 230 dB re. 1 μPa (Zaegaesky, 1987; Hubbs and Rechnitzer, 1972). While maximum source levels1 (SL) of clicks recorded from trained Tursiops (Au et al., 1974) and Delphinapterus (Au et al., 1987) are only a few dB short of this value, there is a gap of 50 to 120 dB between the debilitation threshold and the SL’s reported for odontocete clicks in nature (Levenson, 1974; Watkins and Schevill, 1974; Watkins, 1980a, b).

Keywords

Source Position Sperm Whale Time Domain Measure Acoustical Axis Echolocation Signal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Au, W. W. L., Floyd, R. W., Penner, R. H., and Murchison, A. E., 1974, Measurement of echolocation signals of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus Montagu, in open waters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56(4):1280–1290.Google Scholar
  2. Au, W. W. L., Carder, D. A., Penner, R. H., and Scronce, B. L., 1985, Demonstration of adaptation in beluga whale echo-location signals, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 77(2):726–730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Au, W. W. L., Moore, P. W. B;, and Pawloski, D., 1986, Echolocation transmitting beam of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 80(2):688–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Au, W. W. L., Penner, R. H., and Turl, C. W., 1987, Propagation of beluga echolocation signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 82(3): 807–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford, J. K. B., and Fisher, H. D., 1978, Underwater acoustic signals of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros). Can. J. Zool., 56: 552p–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hubbs, C. L., and Rechnitzer, A. B., 1972, Report on experiments designed to determine effects of underwater explosions on fish life. Calif. Fish Game, 38:33–366.Google Scholar
  7. Levenson, C., 1974, Source level and bistatic target strength of the sperm whale (Physeter catodon) measured from an oceanographic aircraft. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55(5):1100–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meilen, R. H., Browning, D. G., Ross, J. M., and Merklinger, H. M., 1975, Low frequency sound attenuation in Baffin Bay. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 57:1201–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Norris, K. S., and Møhl, B., 1983, Can odontocetes debilitate prey with sound? Am. Nat., 122:85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stapells, D. R., Picton, T. W., and Smith, A. D., 1982, Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72:7–4–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thiele, L., 1983, Ambient noise in the sea off Thule. North Greenland. Rep. 83.88, Ødegaard & Dannskjold-Samsøe, Copenhagen .Google Scholar
  12. Thrane, N. , 1984, The Hilbert transform, Brüel & Kjær Technical Review 3:3–22.Google Scholar
  13. Watkins, W. A., Schevill, W. E., and Ray, C., 1971, Underwater sounds of Monodon (Narwhal). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 49(2): 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watkins, W. A., and Schevill, W. E., 1974, Listening to Hawaiian Spinner Porpoises, Stenella CF. longirostris, with a three-dimensional hydrophone array. J. of Mammalogy, 55(2): 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watkins, W. A., 1980a. Click sounds from animals at sea, in: “Animal Sonar Systems”, R-G. Busnel & J. F. Fish, eds., pp 291–297, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Watkins, W. A., 1980b, Acoustics and behaviour of sperm whales, in: “Animal Sonar Systems”, R-G. Busnel & J. F. Fish, eds., pp 283–290, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiersma, H., 1988, The short-time-duration narrow-bandwidth character of odontocete echolocation signals, in: “Animal Sonar”, P. E. Nachtigall & P. W. B. Moore, eds., pp 129–145. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zaegaesky, M., 1987, Some observations on the prey stunning hypothesis, Marine Mammal Science, 3 (3): 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertel Møhl
    • 1
  • Annemarie Surlykke
    • 2
  • Lee A. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoophysiologyUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Biological InstituteOdense UniversityOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations