Concluding Comments on Sensory Anatomy and Physiology

  • Peter J. Morgane
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 196)


Participants in the workshop on Sensory Anatomy and Physiology discussed many issues pertaining to aspects of continuing work on cetacean brain material. All agreed that among the major problems of carrying-out research in this area was one of inability to obtain adequately and properly prepared brains and other tissues. There especially is need for better communication and networking among scientists in the laboratory and the field relating to availability of material and special preservative and fixative techniques such as for electron microscopic studies or immunocyto-chemical analyses. Obviously, beached, dead specimens are of little use in specialized studies other then for the most gross observations. Brain material must be fresh and quickly perfused for serious microscopic studies. Perfusion must be carried-out to adequately fill the vast rete mirabile complex of the vascular network that is interposed between main blood vessels and the brain. Unfortunately, such perfusions may make the material less useful for many other types of studies such as bacteriological and various chemical analyses. In many cases investigators interested in the body as a whole are reluctant to allow a perfusion that enters the primary circulation and thereby makes many other types of studies impossible.


Medial Geniculate Body Cortical Organization Ontogenetic Study Auditory Region Thalamic Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bowsher, D., 1976, L’evolution des neurones chez les vertebres, La Recherche. 7:935–944.Google Scholar
  2. Bullock, T. H., 1980, Comparative audition: where do we go from here?, in: “Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates”, A. N. Popper and R. F. Fay, eds., Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullock, T. H., 1983, Why study fish brains? Some aims of comparative neurology today, in: “Fish Neurobiology”, Vol. 2, R. E. Davis and R. G. Northcutt, eds., University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 361–368.Google Scholar
  4. Ebbesson, S. O. E., 1980, The parcellation theory and its relation to interspecific variability in brain organization, evolutionary and ontogenetic development and neuronal plasticity, Cell Tissue Res., 213:179–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Garey, L. J. and Revishchin, A. V., 1988, Laminar distribution of cytochrome oxidase activity in porpoise neocortex, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 302:1486–1489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Garey, L. J. and Revishchin, A. V., 1989, Quantitative distribution of GABAimmunoreactive neurons in cetacean visual cortex is similar to that in land mammals, Brain Research. 485:278–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glezer, I. I., Jacobs, M. S. and Morgane, P. J., 1988, Implications of the “initial brain” concept for brain evolution in Cetacea, Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 11:75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krasnoshchekova, E. I. and Figurina, I. I., 1980, The cortical projection of the medial geniculate body of the dolphin brain, Arkhiv Anat. Gistol. Embriol., 78:19–24.Google Scholar
  9. Ladygina, T. F., Mass, A. M. and Supin, A. Ya., 1978, Multiple sensory projections in the dolphin cerebral cortex, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deiat., 18:1047–1054.Google Scholar
  10. Lende, R. A. and Welker, W. I., 1972, An unusual sensory area in the cerebral neocortex of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truneatus. Brain Research, 45:555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacPhee, R. D. E., 1977, Ontogeny of the ectotympanic-petrosal plate relationship in strepsirhine prosimians, Folia Primatol., 27:245–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacPhee, R. D. E., 1979, Entotympanics, ontogeny and primates, Folia Primatol., 31:23–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgane, P. J., Jacobs, M. S. and Galaburda, A., 1985, Conservative features of neocortical evolution in dolphin brain, Brain Behavior and Evolution, 21:176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morgane, P. J., Jacobs, M. S. and Galaburda, A., 1986a, Evolutionary morphology of the dolphin brain, in: “Dolphin Cognition and Behavior. A Comparative Approach”, R. Schusterman, J. Thomas and F. Wood, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
  15. Morgane, P. J., Jacobs, M. S. and Galaburda, A., 1986b, Evolutionary aspects of cortical organization in the dolphin brain, in: “Research on Dolphins”, R.J. Harrison and M. Bryden, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
  16. Morgane, P. J., Glezer, I. I. and Jacobs, M. S., 1988, Visual cortex of the dolphin: An image analysis study, J. Comp. Neurol., 273:3–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morgane, P. J., Glezer, I. I. and Jacobs, M. S., 1989, in press, Comparative and evolutionary anatomy of visual cortex of dolphin, in: “Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 8. Evolution and Comparative Anatomy of Cerebral Cortex.” E. G. Jones and A. Peters, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Sanides, F., 1970, Functional architecture of motor and sensory cortices in primates in the light of a new concept of neocortex evolution, in: “The Primate Brain”, C. R. Noback and W. Montagna, eds., Appleton-Century Crofts, New York, pp. 137–208.Google Scholar
  19. Sanides, F., 1972, Representation in the cerebral cortex and its areal lamination patterns, in: “The Structure and Function of Nervous Tissue”, G. H. Bourne, ed., Academic Press, New York, pp. 329–453.Google Scholar
  20. Sokolov, V. E., Ladygina, T. F. and Supin, A. Ya., 1972, Localization of sensory zones in the dolphin’s cerebral cortex, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 202:490–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Supin, A. Ya., Mukhametov, L., Ladygina, T., Popov, V., Mass, A. and Polyakova, I., 1978, Electrophysiologic study of the dolphin brain, Nauka Press, Moscow, pp. 7–85.Google Scholar
  22. Zook, J. M., Jacobs, M. S., Glezer, I. I. and Morgane, P. J., 1988, Some comparative aspects of auditory brainstem cytoarchitecture in echolocating mammals: Speculations on the morphological basis of time-domain signal processing, in: “Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance”, P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zvorykin, V. P., 1977, Principles of structural organization of the cetacean neocortex, Arkhiv Anat. Gistol. Embriol., 72:5–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Morgane
    • 1
  1. 1.Worcester Foundation for Experimental BiologyShrewsburyUSA

Personalised recommendations