Advertisement

Maternal Separation Anxiety

Its Role in the Balance of Employment and Motherhood in Mothers of Infants
  • Ellen Hock
  • Debra DeMeis
  • Susan McBride
Part of the Springer Studies in Work and Industry book series (SSWI)

Abstract

One clear conclusion from the research on the effects of maternal employment is that the relationships among employment, maternal beliefs, attitudes and practices, and child development are complex and require consideration of many factors. Stolz (1960), in one of the first reviews of the topic, concluded that a striking characteristic of the research on maternal employment was the number of different and often contradictory findings, an observation shared by Hoffman (1974) when she reviewed the literature more than a decade later. Bronfenbrenner and Crouter (1982) made perhaps the most critical observation by stating, “Taken by itself, the fact that a woman works outside the home has no universally predictable effects on the child” (p. 51). The failure to obtain consistent and interpretable results is due in part to the substantial differences among women within each employment status category (Hoffman, 1961, 1984; Lamb, 1982). For example, employed women may differ in their reasons for working, peer and spouse support of their employment, numbers of hours they are employed, and type of job they hold; the list is endless. Consequently, the simple model of comparing employed and nonemployed women and their children cannot be used to examine the effects of employment, and a more complex model must be proposed (Hoffman, 1984). Researchers must identify the differences that exist within the groups of employed and nonemployed women and determine how these differences impact the effects of employment status (Hoffman, 1961, 1984; Lamb, 1982).

Keywords

Child Care Separation Anxiety Maternal Separation Maternal Employment Maternity Ward 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, W. (1985). The meaning of maternal employment for mothers and their perceptions of their three-year-old children. Child Development, 56, 350–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch, G., Barnett, R., & Rivers, C. (1983). Lifeprints: New patterns of love and work for today’s women. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Walker, A. (1982). The ecology of day care. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 71–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Benedek, T. (1970). Motherhood and nurturing. In E. J. Anthony & T. Benedek (Eds.), Parenthood: Its psychology and psychopathology (pp. 153–166). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  5. Birnbaum, J. A. (1975). Life patterns and self-esteem in gifted family-oriented and career-committed women. In M. T. S. Mednick, S. S. Tangri, & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Women and achievement (pp. 396–419). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, M. (1983). The day-care dilemna. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1, Attachment). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brieland, D. (1961). Maternal employment: situational and psychological variables. In A. E. Siegal (Ed.), Research issues related to the effects of maternal employment on children (p. 489). University Park, PA: Social Science Research Center.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1961). Some familial antecedents of responsibility and leadership in adolescents. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Crouter, A. C. (1982). Work and family through time and space. In S. B. Kamerman & C. D. Hayes (Eds.), Families that work: Children in a changing world (pp. 39–83). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke-Stewart, A. (1984). Day care: A new context for research and development. In M. Perlmulter (Ed.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (vol. 17), parent-child interaction and parent-child relations in child development (pp. 61–100).Google Scholar
  12. Clarke-Stewart, A., & Fein, G. (1983). Early childhood programs. In M. M. Harth & J. J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. II, pp. 917–999). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Cohler, B., Weiss, J., & Grunebaum, H. (1970). Child care attitudes and emotional disturbance among mothers of young children. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 82, 3–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. DeMeis, D., Hock, E., & McBride, S. (1986). The balance of employment and motherhood: A longitudinal study of mothers’ feelings about separation from their first born infants. Development Psychology, 122(5), 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easterbrooks, M. A., & Goldberg, W. A. (1985). Effects of maternal employment on toddlers, mothers, and fathers. Developmental Psychology, 21, 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Everson, M. D., Sarnat, L. T., & Ambron, S. R. (1984). Day care and early socialization: The role of maternal attitude. In R. Ainslie (Ed.), The child and the daycare setting (pp. 63–97). New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Farel, A. M. (1980). Effects of preferred maternal roles, maternal employment, and so-ciodemographic status on school adjustment and competence. Child Development, 51, 1179–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankel, D. G., & Roer-Bronstein, D. (1982). Traditional and modern contributions to changing infant-rearing ideologies of two ethnic communities. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, (4, Serial No. 196).Google Scholar
  19. Gamble, T. J., & Ziegler, E. (1986). Effects of infant day care: Another look at the evidence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 26–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gnezda, M. T., & Hock, E. (1983, August). Working mothers of infants: Desired work status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim.Google Scholar
  22. Greenhaus, J. H. (1971). An investigation of the role of career salience in vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hock, E. (1976). Alternative approaches to child rearing and their effects on the mother-infant relationship. Urbana, IL: Educational Resources Information Center/Early Child Education (ED 122943).Google Scholar
  24. Hock, E. (1978). Working and nonworking mothers with infants: Perceptions of their careers, their infants’ needs, and satisfaction with mothering. Developmental Psychology, 14, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hock, E. (1980). Working and nonworking mothers and their infants: A comparitive study of maternal caregiving characteristics and infant social behavior. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 26(2), 80–101.Google Scholar
  26. Hock, E. (1984). The transition to day care: Effects of maternal separation anxiety on infant adjustment. In R. C. Ainslie (Ed.), The child and the day care setting (pp. 183–203) New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Hock, E., Gnezda, T., & McBride, S. (1983). The measurement of maternal separation anxiety. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  28. Hock, E., Gnezda, T., & McBride, S. (1984). Mothers of infants: Attitudes toward employment and motherhood following birth of first child. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman, L. W. (1961). Mother’s enjoyment of work and effects on the child. Child Development, 32, 186–197.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffman, L. W. (1974). Effects of maternal employment on the child: A review of the research. Developmental Psychology, 10, 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffman, L. W. (1984). Work, family, and the socialization of the child. In R. Parke (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 7) (pp. 223–282). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hofferth, S. (1979). Day care in the next decade: 1980–1990. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howes, C., & Olenick, M. (1986). Family and child care influences on toddler’s compliance. Child Development, 57, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamb, M. E. (1982). Maternal employment and child development: A review. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 45–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Lamb, M. E., Chase-Lansdale, L., & Owen, M. T. (1979). The changing American family and its implications for infant social development: The sample case of maternal employment. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family (pp. 267–291). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, D. M. (1943). Maternal overprotection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maital, S. L. (1983). An examination of American and Israeli mothers’ attitudes and behavior toward preschool entry (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 339B.Google Scholar
  38. Martin-Huff, E. (1982). Parental and contextual influences over children’s early adjustment to kindergarten. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, J. C., Jr. (1982). Parents’ choice of day care services. Journal of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 461, 126–134.Google Scholar
  40. Paloma, M. M. (1972). Role conflict and the married professional woman. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Towards a sociology of women. Lexington, MA: Xerox College Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Pederson, F. A., Cain, R. L., Zaslow, M. J., & Anderson, B. J. (1982). Variation in infant experience associated with alternative family roles. In L. M. Laosa & I. E. Sigel, (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children (pp. 203–221). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The Public Agenda Foundation (1983). Survey: Work in the 1980’s and 1990’s. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Roopnarine, J. L., & Lamb, M. E. (1980). Peer and parent-child interaction before and after enrollment in nursery school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1980 1, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schubert, J. B., Bradley-Johnson, B., & Nuttal, J. (1980). Mother-infant communication and maternal employment. Child Development, 51, 246–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegal, A. E. (1961). Characteristics of the mother related to the impact of maternal employment or non-employment. In A. E. Siegal (Eds.). Research issues related to the effects of maternal employment on children (pp. 29–36). University Park, PA: Social Science Research Center.Google Scholar
  46. Stolz, L. (1960). Effects of maternal employment on children: Evidence from research. Child Development, 31, 749–782.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1985). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 1986. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. Yarrow, M. R., Scott, P., DeLeeuw, L., & Heinig, C. (1962). Childrearing in families of working and nonworking mothers. Sociometry, 25, 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen Hock
    • 1
  • Debra DeMeis
    • 2
  • Susan McBride
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Family Relations and Human DevelopmentOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA
  3. 3.Graduate SchoolWheelock CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations