Advertisement

The Role of Heredity, Environment, and “Preparedness” in the Genesis of Neurosis

  • H. J. Eysenck
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

As noted in a previous chapter, Watson’s theory of neurosis is untenable in its original form, and inevitably the 65 years that have elapsed since its publication have unearthed a great deal of evidence to suggest ways in which the theory could be improved, and in part altered. Previous chapters have dealt with changes in the interpretation of conditioning, incorporating cognitive mechanisms, the development of the notion of “incubation of anxiety,” and the shift from Pavlovian A to Pavlovian B conditioning; and the general shift away from S-R to S-S interpretations of conditioning phenomena. In this chapter we will deal with a rather different set of assumptions made by Watson, but clearly erroneous, and shown to be untenable by recent work. These studies deal with the alleged equipotentiality of stimuli, that is, the notion that from the point of view of conditioning all stimuli, however artificial, may be considered equally likely to produce conditioned responses when paired with the UCS; and the more general question of the preparedness of certain stimuli to become associated with UCSs. These problems are considered within the general framework of the relative importance of genetic and environmental factors in predisposing a person to develop neurotic disorders.

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Behavior Therapy Twin Pair Additive Genetic Variance Fear Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agras, W. S., Sylvester, D., & Olivean, D. (1969). The epidemiology of common fears and phobias. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 10, 151–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrindell, W. A. (1980). Dimensional structure and psychopathology correlates of the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS-111) in a phobic population: A factorial definition of agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 229–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrindell, W. A., & van der Ende, J. (1986). Further evidence for cross-sample invariance of phobic factors: Psychiatric inpatient ratings on the Fear Survey Schedule — 111. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 289–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrindell, V. A., & Zwaan, E.J. (1985). Fobische dimensies de AZV-Vreesvragenlijst (AZUV) en Wolpe en Lang’s Fear Survey Schedule (FSS-111.) Ned. Tijdsch. Psychol., 9, 165–178.Google Scholar
  5. Arrindell, A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & van der Ende, J. (1984). Phobic dimensions: I. Reliability and generalisability across samples, gender and nations. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 207–253.Google Scholar
  6. Ayers, J., Benedict, J., Glackenmeyer, R., & Mathews, W. (1974). Some factors involved in the comparison of response systems: Acquisition, extinction and the transfer of head-poke and lever-press Sidman avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 22, 371–379.Google Scholar
  7. Bedford, A., Foulds, G. A., & Sheffied, B. F. (1976). A new personal disturbance scale (DSSI/sAB), British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 387–394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolles, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 77, 32–48.Google Scholar
  9. Bolles, R. C. (1971). Species-specific defense reactions. In F. R. Brush (Ed.), Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bolles, R. G. (1972). The avoidance learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bolles, R. C. (1975). Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Cabe, P. A. (1976). Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: A test of theoretical models of pictorial perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 545–550.Google Scholar
  13. Carey, G., & Gottesman, I. I. (1981). Twin and family studies of anxiety, phobiC., and obsessive disorders. In D. F. Klein & J. Rabkin (Eds.), Anxiety: New research and changing concepts (pp. 117–136). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Comings, D. E. (1979). Pc 1 Duarte, a common polymorphism of a human brain protein, and its relationship to depressive disease and multiple sclerosis. Nature, 277, 28–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, E. W. (1981). Classical conditioning, individual differences, and preparedness. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  17. Cook, E. W. (1983). Human classical conditioning and the preparedness hypothesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  18. Dawson, M. E., & Schell, A. M. (1985). Electrodermal classical conditioning with potentially phobic CSs: Cognitive autonomic dissociations?Google Scholar
  19. Dawson, M. E., & Schell, A. M. (1985). Information processing and human autonomic classical conditioning. In P. K. Ackles, J. E. Jennings & M. G. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Delprato, D.J. (1980). Hereditary determinants of fears and phobias: critical review. Behaviour Therapy, 11, 79–103.Google Scholar
  21. De Silva, P., Rachman, S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1977). Prepared phobies and obsessions: Therapeutic outcome. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 65–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dixon, J. J., de Monchaux, C., & Sandler, J. (1957). Patterns of anxiety: The phobias. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 30, 34–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Doctor, R. M. (1982). Major results of a large-scale pretreatment survey of agoraphobics. In R. L. DuPont (Ed.), Phobia: A comprehensive summary of modern treatments. New York: Bruner-Mazel.Google Scholar
  24. Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H.J. (1975). The nature of extraversion: A genetical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 102–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H.J. (1976a). Genotype X age interaction for neuroticism. Behaviour Genetics, 6, 359–362.Google Scholar
  26. Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H.J. (1976b). Genetical and environmental components of inconsistency and incompatibility in twins’ responses to a neuroticism questionnaire. Behaviour Genetics, 6, 145–160.Google Scholar
  27. Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). A genotype environmental model for psychoticism. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 5–26.Google Scholar
  28. Eaves, L. J.,& Eysenck, H.J. (in press). The genetics of personality. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Eaves, L. J., & Young, P. A. (1981). Genetical theory and personality differences. In R. Lynn (Ed.), Dimensions of personality (pp. 129–179). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Eysenck, H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Eysenck, H.J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Eysenck, H.J.(1956). The inheritance of extraversion-neuroticism. Acta Psychologica, 12, 95–110.Google Scholar
  33. Eysenck, H.J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  34. Eysenck, H.J. (Ed.). (1981). A model for personality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). A biometrical-genetical analysis of impulsivity and sensation seeking behaviour. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.), Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking, Impusivity and Anxiety (pp. 1–27). Hills dale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Eysenck, H.J. (1985a). Personality, cancer and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 535–556.Google Scholar
  37. Eysenck, H. J. (1985b). Smoking and health. In R. D. Tollison (Ed.), Smoking and society (pp. 17–88). Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  38. Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Anxiety, “learned helplessness” and cancer—A causal theory. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 1, 87–104.Google Scholar
  39. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). The manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton, San Diego: EDITS.Google Scholar
  40. Eysenck, H. J., & Prell, D. (1951). The inheritance of neuroticism: An experimental study. Journal of Mental Science, 97, 441–465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Floderus-Myrhed, B., Pederson, N., & Rasmuson, I. (1980). Assessment of heritability for personality based on a short form of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. A study of 12898 twin pairs. Behaviour Genetics, 10, 153–162.Google Scholar
  42. Foulds, G. A. (1965). Personality and personal illness. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  43. Foulds, G. A. (1974). The hierarchical nature of personal illness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Fulker, D. W. (1981). The genetic and environmental architecture of psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism. In H.J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 88–122). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Fulker, J. L., & Simmel, E. C. (Eds.). (1983). Behaviour genetics. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Gray, J. (1970). The psychological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gray, J. (1971). The psychology of fear and stress. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Grossarth-Maticek, R., Schmidt, P., Vetter, H., & Arndt, S. (1984). Psychotherapy research in oncology. In A. Steptoe & A. M. Mathews (Eds.), Health care and human behaviour (pp. 325–340). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H. J., Vetter, H., & Frentzel-Beyme, R. (1986, March). The Heidelberg prospective intervention study. Paper presented at the First International Symposium of Primary Prevention of Cancer, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
  50. Hafner, R. J., & Ross, M. W. (1984). Agoraphobia in women: Factor analysis of symptoms and personality correlates of factor scores in a clinical population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22, 441–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hallam, R. S., & Hafner, R.J. (1978). Fear of phobic patients: factor analyses of self-report data. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamm, A., & Vaiti, D. (1985). “Belongingness”: Operationalisierung eines neuen Konzepts in der Lerntheorie. Archiv für Psychologie, 137, 13–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Heath, S. C., Berg, K., Eaves, L., Solach, M. H., Curey, L., Sundet, J., Magnus, P., & Vance, W. E. (1985). Education policies and the verifiability of educational attainment. Nature, 315, 734–736.Google Scholar
  54. Herrnstein, R.J. (1979). Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 116–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Herrnstein, R.J. (1980). Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 14, 59–95.Google Scholar
  56. Herrnstein, R.J. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal Cognition (pp. 233–261). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Herrnstein, R.J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society. London. B 308, 129–144.Google Scholar
  58. Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concepts in the pigeon. Science, 146, 549–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285–311.Google Scholar
  60. Hersen, M. (1983). Self-assessment of fear. Behaviour Therapy, 4, 241–257.Google Scholar
  61. Hirsch, J., Lindley, R., & Tolman, E. C. (1955). Experimental test of an alleged innate sign stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 278–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hodes, R. L. (1981). A psychophysiological investigation of the classical conditioning model of fears and phobias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  63. Hugdahl, K. (1978). Electrodermal conditioning to potentially phobic stimuli. Effects of instructed extinction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 315–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hugdahl, K., & Kärker, A. C. (1981). Biological vs. experiential factors in phobic conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19, 109–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hugdahl, K., & Ohman, A. (1977). Effects of instruction on acquisition of extinction of electrodermal responses to fear relevant stimuli. Journal of Learning and Memory, 3, 608–618.Google Scholar
  66. Hugdahl, K., & Ohman, A. (1980). Skin conductance conditioning to potentially phobic stimuli as a function of interstimulus interval and delay versus trace paradigm. Psychophysiology, 17, 348–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hugdahl, K., Fredrikson, M., & Ohman, A. (1977). “Preparedness” and “arousability” as determinants of electrodermal conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 345–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., & Henderson, A. S. (1984). Genetic covariation between neuroticism and the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Genetic Epidemiology, 1, 89–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Katz, R., & McGuffin, P. (in press). Neuroticism in familial depression. Psychological Medicine. Google Scholar
  70. Kendler, K. S., Heath, S., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L.J. (1986). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in a volunteer twin population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 213–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Loehlin, J. C., & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment and personality: A study of 850 sets of twins. Austin,TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  72. Martin, N., & Jardine, R. (1986). Eysenck’s contribution to behaviour genetics. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy (pp. 13–47).Google Scholar
  73. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., & Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study. Heredity, 40, 97–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Mather, K., & Jinks, J. L. (1971). Biometrical genetics (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  75. McNally, R. D., & Foa, G. B. (1986). Preparedness and resistance to extinction to fear-relevant stimuli: A failure to replicate. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 529–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. McNiven, S. A. (1960). “Social releaser mechanism” in birds—A controlled replication of Tinbergen’s study. Psychological Record, 10, 259–265.Google Scholar
  77. Melzack, R., Penick, E., & Beckett, A. (1959). The problem of “innate fear” of the hawk shape: An experimental study of Mallard ducks. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 694–698.Google Scholar
  78. Miner, G. D. (1973). The evidence for genetic components in the neuroses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 111–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N., & Holzinger, K.J. (1937). Twins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Æhman, A. (1979). Fear relevance, autonomic conditioning, and phobias: A laboratory model. In P. O. Sjöden, S. Bates, & W. S. Dockens (Eds.), Trends in behavior therapy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. Æhman, A., & Hugdahl, K. (1979). Instructional control of autonomic respondents: Fear-relevance as a critical factor. In N. Birbaumer & H. D. Kimmel (Eds.), Bio-feedback and self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  82. Æhman, A., Eriksson, G., & Löfberg, I. (1975). Phobias and preparedness: Phobic versus neutral pictures as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 11–45.Google Scholar
  83. Æhman, A., Eriksson, A., & Olöfsson, C. (1975). One-trial learning and superior resistance to extinction of autonomic responses conditioned to potentially phobic stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 619–627.Google Scholar
  84. Æhman, A., Fredrikson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö, P. (1976). The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: Conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 313–337.Google Scholar
  85. Æhman, S., Dimberg, V., & Ost, L-G. (1985). Animal and social phobias: Biological constraints on learned fear responses. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 123–175).Google Scholar
  86. Ost, L. G., & Hugdahl, K. (1981). Acquisition of phobias and anxiety response patterns in clinical patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19, 439–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Parker, G. (1979). Parental characteristics in relation to depressive disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 138–147.Google Scholar
  88. Parker, G. (1981a). Parental reports of depressives: An investigation of several explanations. Journal of Affective Disorders, 3, 131–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Parker, G. (1981b). Parental representations of patients with anxiety neurosis. Acta-Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 63, 33–36.Google Scholar
  90. Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Natural kinds. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Rachman, S. (1977). The conditioning theory of fear-acquisition: A critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 375–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Rachman, S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Unprepared phobias: “Be Prepared.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 333–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Redlich, F. C., & Freedman, D. (1966). The theory and practice of psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  94. Rockett, F. C. (1955). A note on “an experimental test of an alleged innate sign stimulus” by Hirsch, Lindley and Tolman. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 5, 155–156.Google Scholar
  95. Roubertoux, P., & Carlier, M. (1972, 1973). Analyse génétique des comportements. L’Année Psychologique, 72, 393–441; 73, 151–223.Google Scholar
  96. Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Nias, D., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1192–1198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Schaller, G. B., & Emlen, J. T. (1962). The autogeny of avoidance behaviour in some precocial birds. Animal Behaviour, 10, 370–381.Google Scholar
  98. Schepank, K. H. (1973). Erb-und Umweltfaktoren bei Neurosen. Nervenarzt, 44, 449–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Schleidt, W. M. (1961). Reaktionen von Truthünern auffliegende Raubvögel und Versuche zur Analyse ihrer AAMs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 18, 534–560.Google Scholar
  100. Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–321.Google Scholar
  101. Seligman, M. E. P., & Hager, J. C. (1972). Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.Google Scholar
  102. Shields, J. (1962). Monozygotic twins. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Slater, E. (1943). The neurotic constitution: A statistical study of two thousand neurotic soldiers. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 6, 1–16.Google Scholar
  104. Slater, E., & Shields, J. (1969). Genetical aspects of anxiety. In M. Lader (Ed.), Studies of anxiety. Ashford, Kent: Headley.Google Scholar
  105. Slater, E., & Slater, P. (1944). A heuristic theory of neurosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 7, 49–55.Google Scholar
  106. Tasto, D. L. (1977). Self-report schedules and inventories. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhom, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  107. Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  108. Tinbergen, N. (1948). Social releases and the experimental method required for their study. The Wilson Bulletin, 60, 6–51.Google Scholar
  109. Torgersen, S. (1979). The nature and origin of common phobic fears. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 343–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Vandenberg, S. G. (1969). Hereditary factors in normal personality traits (as measured by inventories). Recent Advances in Biological Psychiatry, 9, 65–104.Google Scholar
  111. Wade, T. C. (1978). Factor analytic approaches to the investigation of common fears: A critical appraisal and reanalysis. Behavior Therapy, 9, 923–935.Google Scholar
  112. Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
  113. Weitkamp, L. R., Stanger, H. C., Persad, E., Flood, C., & Guttormsen, S. (1981). Depressive disorder and HLA: A gene on chromosome 6 that can affect behaviour. New England Journal of Medicine, 305, 1301–1306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Wolpe, J., & Lange, P.J. (1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behavior therapy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2, 27–30.Google Scholar
  115. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Eysenck
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychiatryLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations