A Response Process Model of Behavior

  • Kieron P. O’Connor
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


There are different schools of thought on the current uneasy relations between theory and practice in clinical psychology. Theoreticians such as Eysenck (1981) take a procedural point of view and argue that clinicians are not rigorous enough in applying learning theory procedures. Clinicians (e.g., Cullen, 1983) argue that the problems are substantive, that everyday behavior unlike laboratory behavior is a complex business requiring multi- or even megavariate control.


Response Process Sensory Event Conditioning Model Sensory Model BEHA VIOR 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and Emotional Disorders. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, A. S. (1979). The Orienting response as novelty and significance detector: Reply to O’Gorman. Psychophysiology, 16, 263–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benzecri, J. P. (1973). L’analyse des données. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  4. Borkovec, T. D. (1979). Incubation and the relevance of functional CS exposure. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyne, J. C. (1982). A critique of cognitions as causal entities with particular reference to depression. Cognitive Research and Therapy, 6(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullen, C. (1983). Implications of functional analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 53–55.Google Scholar
  7. Duffy, E. (1957). The psychological significance of the concept of “arousal” or “activation”. Psychological Review, 64, 265–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin, E. (1978). Behavior Therapy: Scientific, philosophical and moral foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eyberg, S. M. & Robinson, E. A. (1985). Conduct problem behavior. Standardisation of a behavioral rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 24, 51–57.Google Scholar
  10. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). Biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  11. Eysenck, H.J. (1980). A unified theory of psychotherapy, behaviour therapy and spontaneous remission. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 188, 43–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eysenck, H.J. (1981). Behavioral therapy and the conditioning model of neurosis. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernald, C. D., & Gettys, L. (1980). Diagnostic labels of perceptions of childrens’ behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, (3), 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, D. L. (1982). Limited channel models of automatic detection capacity and scanning in visual search. Psychological Review, 89, 662–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, G. L. (1948). The Energetics of Human Behavior. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gale, A. (1981). EEG studies of extraversion-introversion. What’s the next step. In R. Lynn (Ed.), Dimensions of personality (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, J. J. (1982). Notes on action. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism: Selected essays of J.J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, D. A. (1964). Classical and operant conditioning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, J. A. (1970). The physiological basis of introversion-extroversion. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, D. M., & Birdsall, T. G. (1978). Detection and recognition. Psychological Review, 85(3), 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. James, W. (1970). Pragmatism. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, B., & Hulme, M. R. (1976). Evidence for anoutflow theory of skill. Acta Psychologia, 40, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jung, J. (1982). The experimenters challenge. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Laming, D. (1985). Some principles of sensory analysis. Psychological Review, 92(4), 462–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang, P. (1980). Emotional imagery: Conceptual structure and pattern of somatovisceral response. Psychophysiology, 17(2), 179–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liberman, A. H., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). Motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21 (1), 1–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loveless, N. E. (1979). Event related slow potentials of the brain as expressions of orienting function. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, J. F. Orlebeka (Ed.), Orienting reflex in humans, (pp. 77–100). Hills dale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Markham, K. A. (1979). EEG measures of the person and person predicates. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 51–54.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, I., & Levey, A. (1969). The genesis of the classical conditioned response. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  32. McFall, R. (1979). Behavioral training: A skill acquisition approach to clinical problems. In J. T. Spence, R. C. Carson, & J. W. Thibaut (Eds.), Behavioral approaches to therapy, (pp. 227–260). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  33. McGuigan, F. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Meichenbaum, D. (1978). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Munsterberg, H. (1899). The physiological basis of mental life. Science, 9, 442–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newell, K. M. (1978). Some issues on action plans. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. O’Connor, K. P. (in press). Data analysis in individual difference research. In A. Gale & M. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Owens, R. G., & Ashcroft, J. B. (1982). Functional analysis in applied psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 181–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Papakastopoulos, D. (1980). A no stimulus, no response event related potential of the human cortex. EEG Clinical neurophysiology, 48, 622–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parasuraman, R., & Abeatty, J. (1980). Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. Science, 210, 80–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perkins, C. C., Jr. (1947). The relation of secondary reward to gradients of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 377–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prokasy, W. F. (1965). Classical eyelid conditioning. Experimental operations, task demands and response shaping. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  43. Rouanet, H., Bernard, J. M., & Lecoutre, B. (in press). Non probabilistic statistical inference: A set theoretical approach. American Statistician. Google Scholar
  44. Sabat, S. R. (1979). Selective attention, channel capacity and the averaged evoked response in human subjects. Neuropsychologic, 17, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Savage, L.J. (1972). The foundation of statistics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  46. Schachter, S. (1971). Emotion, obesity and crime. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Siddle, D. (1985). Orienting and habituation. Perspectives in human research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Sperry, R. W. (1969). A modified concept of consciousness. Psychological Review, 76, 532–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strelau, J. (1983). Temperament personality activity. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turvey, M. T. (1977). Contrasting orientations to a theory of visual information processing. Psychological Review, 84, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., & Mace, W. (1978). Issues in the theory of action: Degrees of freedom, co ordinate structures and coalitions. In J. Requin (Ed.) Attention and performance, VII. (pp. 557–595). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, J. B., & Raynon, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental psychology, 3, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weimer, W. B. (1977). Motor theories of mind. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, (pp. 270–311). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kieron P. O’Connor
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital Louis H-LaFontaineUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations