Rapid One-Joint Movements: A Qualitative Model and its Experimental Verification

  • R. M. Abdusamatov
  • S. V. Adamovich
  • M. B. Berkinblit
  • A. V. Chernavsky
  • A. G. Feldman

Summary

One of two versions of the equilibrium-point hypothesis is used to provide a qualitative explanation for the control of fast one-joint movements. It is suggested that discrete unidirectional movements are produced by a rapid gradual shift in an equilibrium point to a final position, in combination with another gradual command which produces agonist-antagonist coactivation and ensures the stiffness of the joint. The monotonie central commands and the reflex effects occurring in the course of movement give rise to the characteristic three-burst pattern, as is qualitatively illustrated using the concept of muscle activation area. This form of central command also makes it possible to explain the observable correlation between the duration of the first agonist burst and movement amplitude. Two predictions of the model are experimentally corroborated in the present study: (1) movement trajectories with terminal oscillations can be transformed into aperiodic trajectories by means of transitory perturbations; (2) the onset time, magnitude and duration of the first agonist burst are reflex-dependent. The results are consistent with the assumption that neither the form of movement trajectory nor the form of EMG bursts (time periods and amplitudes) are centrally programmed.

Keywords

Onset Time Movement Trajectory Central Command Agonist Burst Antagonist Burst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdusamatov, R. M., and Feldman, A. G., 1986, Description of electromyograms by a mathematical model of single joint movements. Biofizika. 31, 503–505 (in Russian).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdusamatov, R. M., Adamovich, S. V., and Feldman, A. G. A model for one-joint motor control in man (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Adamovich, S. V., Burlachkova, N. I., and Feldman, A. G., 1984, On the central wave nature of time-angle trajectory formation in man. Biofizika, 29, 122–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berardelli, A., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Kachi, T., and Marsden, C. D., 1984, Duration of the first agonist EMG burst in ballistic arm movements. Brain Research. 304, 183–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizzi, E., 1980, Central and peripheral mechanisms in motor control. in: G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin, eds. Tutorials in Motor Behavior. North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bizzi, E., Accornero, N., Chappie, W., and Hogan, N., 1982, Arm trajectory formation in monkeys. Exp. Brain Research, 46,139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. H., and Cooke, J. D., 1984, Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude. Exp. Brain Research, 55, 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S.H., and Cooke, J. D., 1986, Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceeding movement. Brain Res., 377, 311–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crago, P. E., Houk, J. C., and Hasan, Z., 1976, Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J. Neurophysiol., 39, 925–935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Day, B. L., Rothwell, J. C., and Marsden, C. D., 1983, Interaction between the long-latency stretch reflex and voluntary electromyographic activity prior to a rapid voluntary motor reaction. Brain Res., 270, 55–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman, A. G., 1966, Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscle. Biophysics, 11, 565–578.Google Scholar
  12. Feldman, A. G., 1974, Control of the length of a muscle. Biophysics. 19, 771–776.Google Scholar
  13. Feldman, A. G., 1980, Superposition of motor programs. I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience. 5, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, A. G., 1986, Once more on the equilibrium point hypothesis (8-model) for motor control. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 17–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasser, H.S., and Hill, A. V., 1924, The dynamics of muscular contraction. Proc. of Rov. Soc. of Lond., B96, 398–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghez, C., and Martin, J.H., 1982, The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. Exp. Brain Research. 45, 115–125.Google Scholar
  17. Granit, R., 1970, The basis of motor control. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hallett, M., Shahani, B. T., and Young, R. R., 1975, EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J. Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 38, 1154–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogan, N., 1984, An organising principle for a class of voluntary movements. J. Neuroscience. 4, 2745–2754.Google Scholar
  20. Kelso, J.A.S., and Holt, K.G., 1980, Exploring a vibratory system analysis of human movement production. J. Neurophysiol., 43, 1183–1196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelso, J.A.S., and Saltzman, EX., 1982, Motor control: Which themes do we orchestrate ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kugler, P.N., Kelso, J.A.S., and Turvey, M.T., 1980, On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. in: G.E. Stelmach and J. Requin, eds. Tutorials in Motor Behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lestienne, F., 1979, Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp. Brain Research, 34, 407–418.Google Scholar
  24. Partridge, L.D., and Benton, L.A., 1983, Muscle, the motor. in: V. Brooks, ed. Motor Control. Handbook of Physiology — The Nervous System. Sec. 1, vol.11, part 1: Am. Physiol. Soc, Bethesda, pp. 43–106.Google Scholar
  25. Soetching, J.F., Ranish, N.A., Palminteri, R., and Terzuolo, C.A., 1976, Changes in a motor pattern following cerebellar and olivary lesions in the squirrel monkey. Brain Research. 105, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Terzuolo, C. A., Soetching, J.F., and Viviani, P., 1973, Studies on the control of some simple motor tasks. I. Relations between parameters of movements and EMG activities. Brain Research. 58, 212–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vincken, M.H., 1983, Control of limb stiffness. Thesis. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  28. Wadman, W.J., Denier van der Gon, J.J., Geuze, R.H., and Mol, C.R., 1979, Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 5, 3–17.Google Scholar
  29. Wadman, W.J., Denier van der Gon, J.J., and Derksen, R.J.A., 1980a, Muscle activation patterns for fast goal-directed arm movements. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 6, 19–37.Google Scholar
  30. Wadman, W.J., Boerhout, W., and Denier van der Gon, J.J., 1980b, Responses of the arm movement control system to force impulses. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 6, 280–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Abdusamatov
    • 1
  • S. V. Adamovich
    • 1
  • M. B. Berkinblit
    • 1
  • A. V. Chernavsky
    • 1
  • A. G. Feldman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Problems of Information TransmissionAcademy of SciencesMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations