Modulating Processes of Single Fusimotor Fibre Discharge in Man
Experiments were performed on awake human subjects in which single nerve fibre activity was recorded in the lateral peroneal nerve using tungsten microelectrodes as described by Hagbarth & Vallbo (1967).
This discharge of thirteen single efferent fibres innervating the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) or the extensor digitorum longus muscle (EDL) was recorded. On the basis of their functional activity, seven fibres were identified as fusimotor fibres.
Their efferent nature was demonstrated by the fact that the various tests used to identify afferent fibres elicited no response of these fibres. These efferent fibres were considered as fusimotor because their discharges were uncorrected with any activation of extrafusal muscle fibres. Several means were used to detect activation of extrafusal fibres: surface EMG electrodes, tungsten electrodes deeply implanted in the muscle and especially the use of a high-sensitivity tension transducer (0.1 mN) placed on muscle tendons. Fusimotor fibres were generally spontaneously active with some fluctuation in the discharge frequency.
The activity in fusimotor fibres could be either elicited or modulated under the following conditions: clenching of the fists, pinna twisting, voluntary isometric contraction, passive phasic stretch of the muscle, mental computation, environmental disturbances, subject laughing, the sound of hand clapping, and subject listening to manoeuvre instructions. Moreover, during spontaneous fusimotor fiber activity two subjects were able to voluntarily stop the unit discharge.
The results are compared to those obtained in animal studies and discussed with reference to the notion of alpha-gamma linkage, static and dynamic gamma motoneuron activities, and to another available data concerning the effects of various stimulations on muscle spindle afferent activities in man.
KeywordsTibialis Anterior Extensor Digitorum Longus Muscle Spindle Muscle Nerve Sympathetic Activity Mental Computation
- Appenteg, K., Hulliger, M., Prochazka, A., and Zangger, P., 1983, Fusimotor action during movement, deduced by matching the pattern of afferent discharge in freely moving and anaesthetized cats, J. Physiol., 334: 29–30.Google Scholar
- Boyd, I. A., 1981, The action of the three types of intrafusal fibres in isolated cat muscle spindle on the dynamic and length sensitivities of primary and secondary sensory endings, in: Taylor, A., Prochazka, A, Eds., “Muscle receptors and movement”, MacMillan, London, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
- Brown, M. C., and Matthews, P. B. C., 1966, On the subdivision of efferent fibres to muscle spindle into static and dynamic fusimotor fibres, in: Andrew, B.L., Ed., “Control and innervation of skeletal muscle”, Truex, Oxford, pp. 18–31.Google Scholar
- Burke, D., 1981, The activity of human muscle spindle endings in normal behaviour, Int. Rev. Physiol., 20: 91–136.Google Scholar
- Burke, D., Hagbarth, K. E., Lofstedt, L., and Wallin, B. G., 1976b, The response of human spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction, J. Physiol., 277: 131–142.Google Scholar
- Ellaway, P. H., Pascoe, J. E., and Trott, J. R., 1976, The effects upon fusimotor neurons on small, brief stretches of their muscles, J. Physiol., 258: 48–49.Google Scholar
- Hagbarth, K. E., 1979, Exteroceptive, proprioceptive and sympathetic activity recorded with microelectrodes from human peripheral nerves, Mayo Clinic Proc, 54: 353–365.Google Scholar
- Henneman, E., Somjen, G., and Carpenter, P. O., 1965a, Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons, J. Neurophys., 28: 560–580.Google Scholar
- Henneman, E., Somjen, G., and Carpenter, P. O., 1965b, Excitability and inhibitibility of motoneurons of different sizes, J. Neurophys., 28: 599–620.Google Scholar
- Henneman, E., and Mendell, L. M., 1981, Functional organization of motoneuron pool and its inputs, in.: Brookhart, J.M., Mountcastle, V.B., and Brooks, V.B., Eds., “Motor control (part 1), Handbook of Physiology”, sect. 1, vol. 2, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 423–507.Google Scholar
- Hulliger, M., 1984, The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control Rev. Physiol. Bioch. Pharmacol., 101: 110 pp.Google Scholar
- Jendrassik, E., 1883, Beiträge zur Lehre von den Sehnenreflexen, Statist Archiv für Klin. Med., 33: 177–199.Google Scholar
- Laporte, Y., 1978, The motor innervation of the mammalian muscle spindle, in: Porter R., Ed., Studies in Neurophysiology presented to McIntyre A.K., Cambridge University Press, pp 45–59.Google Scholar
- Laporte, Y., 1979, Innervation of cat muscle spindles by fast-conducting skeletomotor fibres, in: Asanuma H., Wilson V.J., Eds., “Integration in the nervous system”, Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, pp 3–12.Google Scholar
- McCloskey, D. I., 1978, Kinesthetic sensibility, Physiol Rev., 58: 768–820.Google Scholar
- Matthews, P. B. C. 1972, Mammalian muscle receptors and their central action, Monographs of the Physiological Society, Edward Arnold Ldt., London, 630 pp.Google Scholar
- Matthews, P. B. C., 1977, Muscle afferents and kinaesthesia, British Med. Bull 33: 137–142.Google Scholar
- Matthews, P. B. C., 1981b, Muscles spindles: their messages and their motor supply, in: Brookhart, J.M., Mountcastle, V.B., and Brooks, Y.B., Eds., “Motor control, part 1, Handbook of Physiology”, sect 1, vol. 2, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 189–228.Google Scholar
- Paillard, J., 1955, Réflexes et régulations d’origine proprioceptive chez l’Homme, Etude neurophysiologique et psychophysiologique, Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat, Arnette, Paris, 293 pp.Google Scholar
- Prochazka, A., and Wand, P., 1981, Independence of fusimotor and skeletomotor systems during voluntary movement, in.: Taylor, A., and Prochazka, A., Eds., “Muscle receptors and movement”, McMillan Ldt., London, pp 229–243.Google Scholar
- Prochazka, A., and Hulliger, M., 1983, Muscle afferent function and its significance for motor control mechanisms during voluntary movement in cat, monkey and man, in: Desmedt, J.E., Ed., “Motor control mechanisms in health and disease”, Raven Press, New York, pp 93–132.Google Scholar
- Stuart, D. G., Mosher, C. G., Gerlach, R. L., and Reinking, R. M., 1970, Selective activation of la afferents by transient muscle stretch, Exp. Brain Res., 10: 177–187.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A., and Appenteg, A., 1981, Distinctive modes of static and dynamic fusimotor drive in jaw muscles, in: Taylor, A., Prochazka, A., Eds., “Muscle receptors and movement”, McMillan, London, pp 179–192.Google Scholar
- Vedel, J. P., and Roll, J. P., 1983, Muscle spindle contribution to the coding of motor activities in man, in: Massion, J., Paillard, J., Schultz, W., and Wiesendanger, M., Eds., “Neural coding of motor performance”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Exp. Brain Res., Suppl. 7, pp 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar