Presynaptic Control of Afferent Input During Real Locomotion in Rats

  • I. A. Yakhnitsa
  • A. L. Pilyavsky
  • N. V. Bulgokova

Summary

Studies were carried out on dorsal root potential (DRP) and dorsal root antidromic action potentials (AAPs) during two types of locomotion (swimming and stepping), which could be distinguished by the intensity of their afferent inputs (AI).

AAPs were taken to be an index to the level of depolarization of low-threshold afferent fibres and DRP, to that of high-threshold ones. During single swimming or stepping locomotor cycles, two DRP and AAP maxima, were found to be associated with the stance (or retraction) and swing phases. The values of AAPs and DRP and the intensity of AI during locomotion and passive hindlimb movements, respectively, were found to be clearly correlated. No dependence between intensity of depolarization of afferent fibres and efferent output was observed during real locomotion, contrary to what was observed during passive hindlimb movement.

It was concluded that DRP and AAPs during real locomotion are initiated mainly by influences from peripheral afferents.

Keywords

Dorsal Root Tibialis Anterior Stance Phase Afferent Input Swing Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akazawa, K., Aldridge, J. W., Steeves, J. D., and Stein, R. B., 1982, Modulation of stretch reflexes during locomotion in the mesencephalic cat, J. Physiol., 329:553–567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayev, K. V., 1980, Polarization of lumbar primary afferent terminals during fictitious locomotion, Neirofiziologiva. 12: 481–488.Google Scholar
  3. Bayev, K. V., and Esipenko, V. B., 1985, Primary afferent depolarization in lumbosacral spinal cord during real locomotion, Neirofiziologiya. 17: 119–121.Google Scholar
  4. Bayev, K. V., and Kostyuk, P. G., 1982, Polarization of primary afferent terminals of lumbosacral cord elicited by the activity of spinal locomotor generator, Neuroscience. 7: 1401–1409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, C. M. C., and Koizumi, K. 1956, Origin of the dorsal root reflex, J. Neurophysiol., 19: 61–74.Google Scholar
  6. Bulgakova, N., V. Pilyavsky, and A. L, Yakhnitsa, I. A., 1985, Phase-dependent modulation of antidromic spike potentials in rat dorsal root during locomotion, Neirofiziologiva. 17: 707–710.Google Scholar
  7. Chapin, J. K., and Woodward, D. J., 1982, Somatic sensory transmission to the cortex during movement: Gating of single cell responses to touch, Exp. Neurology. 78: 654–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chez, C., and Pïsa, M., 1972, Inhibition of afferent transmission in cuneate nucleus during voluntary movement in the cat, Brain Res., 40: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz, V., Quintern, J., and Berger, W., 1985, Afferent control of human stance and gait: evidence for blocking of group 1 afferents during gait, Exp. Brain Res., 61: 153–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubuc, R., Cabelguen, J. N., and Rossignol, S., 1985, Rhythmic antidromic discharges of single primary afferents recorded in cat dorsal root filaments during locomotion in the cat, Brain Res., 359: 375–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duysens, J., and Pearson, K. G., 1980, Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats, Brain Res., 187: 321–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. C., Kostyuk, P. G., and Schmidt, R. F., 1962, Presynaptic inhibition of the central actions of flexor reflex afferents, J. Physiol., 161: 258–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. C., Kozak, W., and Magni, F., 1961, Dorsal root reflexes of muscle group I afferent fibres, J. Physiol., 159: 128–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Forssberg, H., Grillner, S., and Rossignol, S., 1975, Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in chronic spinal cats, Brain Res., 85:103–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grillner, S., 1975, Locomotion in Vertebrates: Central mechanisms and reflex interaction, Physiol., Rev. 55: 247–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lennard, P. R., and Hermanson, J.W., 1985, Central reflex modulation during locomotion, Trends in Neuroscl. 8: 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levy, R., 1980, Presynaptic control of input to the central nervous system, Canad. J. of Physiol., a. Pharm. 58: 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts, H. T., and Wallis, D., 1978, Dorsal and ventral root potentials recorded in vivo by the sucrose-gap method. J. Physiol., 277: 42–43.Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, R. F., 1973, Control of the access of afferent activity to somatosensory pathways, in: “Handbook of Sensory Physiology”, Berlin: Springer. 2: 151–206.Google Scholar
  20. Shik, M. L., and Orlovsky, G. N., 1976, Neurophysioloy of locomotion automatism, Physiol., Rev. 56: 465–501.Google Scholar
  21. Yakhnitsa, I. A., Pilyavsky, A. I., and Bulgakova, N. V., 1985, Investigation of different kinds of locomotor movements in rats, Neirofiziologiva. 17: 183–189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Yakhnitsa
    • 1
  • A. L. Pilyavsky
    • 1
  • N. V. Bulgokova
    • 1
  1. 1.A.A. Bogomoletz Institue of PhysiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSRKievRussia

Personalised recommendations