Regeneration of Muscle Spindles in Grafted Extensor Digitorum Longus Muscle of the Rat

  • T. Soukup

Abstract

Mammalian skeletal muscles possess considerable capacity to regenerate following muscle injury (e.g. Studitsky, 1977). Grafting of a muscle results in the degeneration of muscle fibers due to ischemia, but within several days, their regeneration takes place and the differentiating graft is revascularized and reinnervated during the first three weeks after the operation (for review see Carlson, 1983). Intrafusal fibers of muscle spindles undergo the same process of degeneration and regeneration as the whole muscle and they do regenerate in free grafts (Carlson and Gutmann, 1975; Schmalbruch, 1977; Rogers, 1982). The standard technique of free grafting has a great drawback, as the onset and extent of regeneration of the neuromuscular pathways disrupted at the time of grafting is difficult to control. To overcome this disadvantage, nerve-intact grafts (Rogers and Carlson, 1981), bupivacaine treatment (Milburn, 1976) or other techniques, e.g. temporary ischemia (Diwan and Milburn, 1986; Scott et al., 1988) were introduced for the study of spindle regeneration. These techniques leave the innervation pathways in the muscle intact, thus giving a better chance for regeneration than can be expected after standard grafting, where the reinnervation is likely to be more random. Because of the possible practical utilization, we returned to the classical model of standard free grafting, but we allowed a sufficiently long time for muscle regeneration. In the present paper we focussed on the histochemical reactions of intrafusal fibers after autotransplantation. The preliminary results were published previously (Soukup, 1981).

Keywords

Muscle Spindle Mammalian Skeletal Muscle Free Graft Muscle Spin Intrafusal Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlson, B.M., 1983, The regeneration and transplantation of skeletal muscle, in: “Nerve, Organ and Tissue Regeneration: Research Perspectives”, F.J. Seil, ed., Academic Press, pp. 431-454.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, B.M., and Gutmann, E., 1975, Regeneration in free grafts of normal and denervated muscles in the rat: Morphology and histochemistry, Anat. Rec., 183, 47–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Divan, F.H., and Milburn, A., 1986, The effects of temporary ischaemia on rat muscle spindles, J. Embryol. exp. Morphol., 92, 223–254.Google Scholar
  4. Guth, L., and Samaha, F.J., 1970, Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. Exp. Neurol., 28: 365–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Milburn, A., 1976, The effect of the local anaesthetic bupivacaine on the muscle spindle of rat. J. Neurocytol., 5: 425–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nachlas, M.M., Tsou, K.C., De Souza, E., Cheng, C.S., and Seligman, A.M., 1957, Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrasole, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 5, 420–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rodgers, S.L., 1982, Muscle spindle formation and differentiation in regenerating rat muscle grafts. Devl. Biol., 94: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rodgers, S.L., and Carlson, B.M., 1981, A quantitative assessment of muscle spindle formation in reinnervated and non-reinnervated grafts of the rat extensor digitorum longus muscle, Neuroscience, 6, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmalbruch, H., 1977, Regeneration of soleus muscles of rat autografted in toto as studied by electron microscopy. Cell Tiss. Res., 177: 159–180.Google Scholar
  10. Scott, S.J.A., Barker, D., and Berry, R.B., 1988, Muscle spindle recovery in orthotopic grafts of cat muscles, this volume.Google Scholar
  11. Soukup, T., 1976, Intrafusal fibre types in rat limb muscle spindles. Morphological and histochemical characteristics. Histochemistry, 47: 43–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Soukup, T., 1981, Histochemical differentiation of intrafusal and extrafusai muscle fibres after autotransplantation, Physiol. bohemoslov., 30: 457.Google Scholar
  13. Soukup, T., Vydra, J., and Cerny, M., 1979, Changes in ATPase and SDH reactions of the rat extrafusai and intrafusal muscle fibres after preincubations at different pH, Histochemistry, 60, 71–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Studitsky, A.N., 1977, “Muscle Transplantation in Animals”, Medgiz, Moscow.Google Scholar
  15. Zelená, J., 1976, The role of sensory innervation in the development of mechanoreceptors, Progr. Brain Res., 43, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zelená, J., and Sobotková, M., 1971, Absence of muscle spindles in regenerated muscles of the rat, Physiol. bohemoslov., 20, 433–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Soukup
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPrague 4Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations