Developmental Aspects of Muscle Stretch Receptor Function in the Rat and the Cat

  • R. Vejsada
  • P. Hník
  • L. Jami
  • R. Payne
  • D. Zytnicki

Abstract

It was already Skoglund in 1960 who pointed out that the functional properties of muscle spindles of young kittens differ in several aspects from those of adult cats. One of the most conspicuous features in new-born kitten spindles was their phasic activity upon a ramp-and-hold stretch of the parent muscle. According to Skoglund (1960 b), this fast-adapting response prevailed in gastrocnemius muscle spindles until 6–10 days after birth.

Keywords

Hind Limb Muscle Spindle Early Postnatal Period Stretch Receptor Acta Physiol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, J., and Sudarshan, K., 1975, Postnatal development of locomotion in the laboratory rat, Anim. Behav., 23, 896–920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, D., and Milburn, A., 1984, Development and regeneration of mammalian muscle spindle, Sci. Progr. Oxford 69: 45–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bursian, A.V., 1973, The development of stretch reflex in growing rats (in Russian, with English summary), Zh. evol. biokhim. fiziol., 9, 600–605.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, R., Functional maturation of muscle spindles in the tenuissimus muscles of kittens (this volume).Google Scholar
  5. Ekholm, J., 1967, Postnatal changes in cutaneous reflexes and in the discharge pattern of cutaneous and articular sense organs, Acta physiol. scand., Suppl. 297:1–130.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrington, D.G., and Rowe, M.J., 1980, Functional capacities of tactile afferent fibres in neonatal kittens, J. Physiol. London 307: 335–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, M., 1987, Cutaneous primary afferent properties in the hind limb of the neonatal rat, J. Physiol. London 383: 79–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory, J.E., and Proske, U., 1985, Responses of muscle receptors in the kitten, J. Physiol. London 366: 27–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory, J.E., and Proske, U., 1986, Fusimotor axons in the kitten, J. Neurophysiol., 56, 1462–1486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory, J.E., and Proske, U., 1987, Responses of muscle receptors in the kitten to succinyl choline, Exp. Brain Res., 66, 167–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hník, P., and Lessler, M.J., 1973, Changes in muscle spindle activity of the chronically de-efferented gastrocnemius of the rat, Pflügers Arch., 341, 155–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jami, L., Vejsada, R., and Zytnicki, D., 1986a, Muscle stretch receptors in kittens, Neurosci. Lett., Suppl. 26:S563.Google Scholar
  13. Jami, L., Vejsada, R., and Zytnicki, D., 1986b, Récepteurs musculaires répondant à 1 étirment chez le chaton, J. Physiol. (Paris), 81:8A.Google Scholar
  14. Kucera, J., and Walro, J.M., Innervation of immature muscle spindles in the rat (this volume).Google Scholar
  15. Kudo, N., and Yamada, T., 1985, Development of the monosynaptic stretch reflex in the rat: an in vitro study, J. Physiol. London 369: 127–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kudo, N., and Yamada, T., 1987, N-Methyl-D, L-aspartate-induced locomotor activity in a spinal cord-hindlimb muscles preparation of the newborn rat studied in vitro, Neurosci. Lett., 75, 43–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Landon, D.N., 1972, The fine structure of the equatorial regions of developing muscle spindles in the rat, J. Neurocytol., 1, 189–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milburn, A., 1973, The early development of muscle spindles in the rat, J. Cell Sci., 12, 175–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Milburn, A., 1984, Stages in the development of cat muscle spindles, J. Embryol. exp. Morphol., 82, 177–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Naka, K.-I., 1964, Electrophysiology of the fetal spinal cord. I. Action potentials of the motoneuron, J. gen. Physiol., 47, 1003–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Navarrete, R., and Vrbová, G., 1985, Precocious activation of locomotor activity by L-DOPA in the neonatal rat, Neurosci. Lett., Suppl. 22:S596.Google Scholar
  22. Proske, U., and Gregory, J.E., The dynamic sensitivity of muscle spindles in the kitten (this volume).Google Scholar
  23. Sechzer, J.A., Folstein, S.E., Geiger, E.H., Mervis, R.F., and Meehan, S.M., 1984, Development and maturation of postural reflexes in normal kittens, Exp. Neurol., 86, 493–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skoglund, S., 1960a, On the postnatal development of postural mechanisms as revealed by electromyography and myography in decerebrate kitten, Acta physiol. scand., 49, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skoglund, S., 1960b, The activity of muscle receptors in the kitten, Acta physiol. scand., 50, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vejsada, R., Hník, P., Payne, R., Ujec, E., and Paleček, J., 1986a, The postnatal functional development of muscle stretch receptors in the rat, Somatosensory Res., 2, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vejsada, R., Paleček, J., Hník, P., and Soukup, T., 1986b, Postnatal development of conduction velocity and fibre size in the rat tibial nerve, Int. J. Devl. Neurosci., 3, 583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zelená, J., 1957, Morphogenetic influence of innervation on the development of muscle spindles, J. Embryol. exp. Morphol., 5, 283–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Vejsada
    • 1
  • P. Hník
    • 1
  • L. Jami
    • 2
  • R. Payne
    • 3
  • D. Zytnicki
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia
  2. 2.Laboratoire de NeurophysiologieCollège de FranceParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Physiology, Marischal CollegeUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenScotland

Personalised recommendations