Abstract
Each year, approximately 30,000 genetically handicapped at-risk infants are born in the United States.1 In Australia alone, it has been estimated by the new South Wales Health Commission that approximately $500,000 will be spent during an average lifetime for one institutionalized person with a genetic abnormality.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ellis, Letting Defective Babies Die: Who Decides? 7 Am. J. Law & Med. 393, n. 1 (1981).
S. Hayes & R. Hayes, Mental Retardation: Law, Policy and Administration 48–49 (1981).
Childress, Triage in Neonatal Intensive Care: The Limitations of a Metaphor, 69 Va. L. Rev. 547 (1983).
Id.
Time, Aug. 9, 1982, at 42.
Id.
Pub. Law No. 93–112, tit. V, § 504, 87 Stat. 394 (1973).
42 U.S.C. § 2000d (1976).
20 U.S.C. § 1681 (1976).
Supra note 7.
Id.
29 U.S.C. § 706(6) (1976). Since originally Section 504 did not grant either civil or criminal sanctions for violations lodged under it, in 1978 the Act was amended to make all those remedies which are available under The Civil Rights Act of 1964 applicable to Section 504 claims. Pub. Law No. 95–602, 92 Stat. 2955, Rehabilitation Comprehensive Services and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978.
Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 411 F. Supp. 982 (E.D. Pa. 1976).
Camenisch v. Univ. of Texas, 616 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1980).
Ferris v. Univ. of Texas 558 F. Supp. 536 (W.D. Tex. 1983) (plaintiff sued to require the University to make its shuttle buses accessible to wheelchairs).
Discrimination Against the Handicapped by Withholding Treatment of Nourishment, 47 Fed. Reg. 26,027 (1982).
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap, 48 Fed. Reg. 9630 (1983).
Id.
U.S. v. Univ. Hospital, State Univ. of N.Y. at Stony Brook, Memo. Op. at pp. 43, 47.
561 F. Supp. 395 (D.D.C. 1983).
Id.
49 Fed. Reg. 1622 (Jan. 12, 1984).
American Hospital Assn. v. Heckler, 585 F. Supp. 541 (S.D.N.Y. 1984) See also The Economist, July 14, 1984, at 42; Wash. Post, Aug. 18, 1984, at A2, col. 3.
H. R. 1904.
S. 1003.
Report No. 98–159, House of Representatives, 98th Cong., 1st Sess., (1983).
42 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. (1984).
49 Fed. Reg. 48170 (Dec. 10, 1984).
Id. at 48171.
Id. at 48170.
Id.
Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 82-3801-3804 (Supp. 1978); Ind. Code § 35-1.58.5.7 (1975); New Mex. Stat. Ann. § 24.7.1 to 11 (1978) Following the principal Baby Doe Case in Indiana, three states enacted specific legislative programs designed to prevent an occurrence of this nature happening again: Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36-2281. A (West Supp. 1983); Ind. Code Ann. § 31-6-4.3 (West Supp. 1983); and La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:1299.36.1A (West Supp. 1983).
Ark. Stat. Ann., supra.
New Mex. Stat. Ann., supra note 32.
Id. at 24.7.3.
Id.
Ind. Code, supra note 32.
Id.
B. Sales, D. Powell & R. Van Duizend, Disabled Persons and the Law 89–91 (1982).
See also Kuzma, The Legislative Response to Infant Doe, 59 Ind. L. J. 376 (1984).
49 Fed. Reg. 1622 at 1652 (Jan. 12, 1984). See generally Brief Amicus Curiae of Professor George P. Smith in Bowen v. American Hospital Association, U.S. Sup. Ct., Sept. 30, 1985, 476 U.S. 610 (1986).
Id.
Id. at 1653–1654.
Id. at 1652.
Id.
Id. at 1652.
Id.
Id. at 1651.
Id. at 1653–1654.
Id.
Id. at 1646–1649.
Marton, Fight for Baby Jane, The Times, Dec. 4, 1983, at 45, col. 1.
In re B (A Minor), C.A. 1981, 1 W.L.R. 1421.
Id. at 1422.
Id. at 1423.
Id. at 1424.
Id. See Dickens, The Modern Function and Limits of Parental Rights, 97 L. Q. Rev. 462 (1981).
Kennedy, Reflections on The Arthur Trial, 59 New Society 13 (Jan. 7, 1982).
Glover, Letting People Die, London Rev. of Books, Mar. 4–17, 1982, at 3.
Newsweek, Int’l Ed., Dec. 12, 1982, at 27.
In the matter of William E. Webster, Guardian Ad Litern for Baby Jane Doe v. Stony Brook Hospital, et al, Oct. 28, 1983. Slip Opinion No. 676 at pp. 4, 5; 456 N.E. 2d 1186 C.N.Y. (1983).
Application of Frank T. Curio, M.D., 421 N.Y.S. 2d 965, 968 (1979).
See Van der Dussen, Givan: Court’s “Doe” Action Set No Legal Precedent, Bloomington Herald-Telephone, April 23, 1982, at 1, col. 1. In re Infant Doe, No. GU 8204-00 (Cir. Ct. Monroe County, Ind., April 12, 1982) writ of mandamus dismissed sub nom. Infant Doe v. Baker, No. 482—S140 (Ind. Sup. Ct., May 27, 1982) (case mooted by child’s death).
Robertson, Dilemma in Danville, Hastings Center Rep., 5, (Oct. 1981).
See The Moral Dilemma of Siamese Twins, Newsweek, June 22, 1981, at 40.
State Drops Siamese Twins Case, N.Y. Times, Apr. 17, 1983, at 6, col. 2.
Campell & Duff, Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in the Special Case Nursery, 289 New Eng. J. Med., 890 (1973).
Ellis, Letting Defective Babies Die: Who Decides? 7 Am. J. Law & Med. 393, 399 (1981).
Robertson, Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns: A Legal Analysis, 21 Stan. L. Rev. 213 (1974).
M. Shapiro & R. Spece, Jr., Cases, Materials and Problems on Bioethics and Law, 702, 703 (1981).
Supra note 66. Harvard, Legislation is Likely to Create More Difficulties Than It Resolves, 9 J. Med. Ethics 18 (1983).
Supra note 66, at 893-894.
Fost, Counseling Families Who Have a Child with a Severe Congenital Anomaly, 1981 Pediatrics 321–323; Editorial, Severely Handicapped Infants, 7 J. Med. Ethics 115 (1981); Diamond, Treatment Versus Non-Treatment for the Handicapped in Infanticide and the Handicapped Newborn at 55, 62 (D. Horan & N. Delaboyd eds. 1982).
Koop, Ethical and Surgical Consideration in the Care of Newborns with Congenital Abnormalities in D. Horan & N. Delaboyd supra, at 71.
Id.
The President’s Commission for The Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues on Treatment Decisions (Committee Print, Mar. 21, 1983) at 226, 228. This Commission ceased operating in 1983.
Id.
Id.
Current Opinions of the Judicial Council of the American Medical Association, A.M.A., 1982, at 9.
Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation Treatment Report of the Law Reform Commission of Canada, No. 20 at 24–26 (1983).
Sternberg, Lying Hopelessly Ill, Infant Tests Law of Hospital Survival, Wash. Post, Apr. 3, 1983, at A4, col. 1.
Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, at 1476 (W. Cornett ed. 1976).
Childress, Triage in Neonatal Intensive Care: The Limitations of a Metaphor, 69 Va. L. Rev. 547, 549 (1983).
See D. Rund & T. Rausch, Triage 3–10 (1981).
G. Winslow, Triage and Justice 1 (1982).
Id. at 2.
Id.
Id. at 5.
Supra note 81, at 550.
Id.
Note, Scarce Medical Resources, 69 Colum. L. Rev. 620 (1969).
See generally, Smith, Triage: Endgame Realities, 1 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y., 143 (1985).
Supra note 83, at 106.
Id. at 63-86.
Id. at 87.
Id.
Id.
Id. at 88-106.
Gewrith, Can Utilitarianism Justify Any Moral Rights? in Ethics, Economics and the Law, 167 (J. Pennock & J. Chapman eds. 1982).
Id. at 167, 168.
Id. at 168.
See generally Smith, Uncertainties on the Spiral Staircase: Metaethics and The New Biology, 41 The Pharos J. 10 (1977).
G. Smith, Genetics, Ethics and the Law, 2, 8, (1981).
Id.
Id.
Young, Infanticide and The Severely Defective Infant, in Problems of the Handicapped at 131 (R. Laura ed. 1980). See also M. Tooley, Abortion and Infanticide (1983).
Id.
Editorial, Bioethics and The Law, Reform (The Law Reform Commission J.), at 10 (Jan. 1979).
Cranford & Doudera, The Emergence of Institutional Ethics Committees, L., Med. & Health Care 13 (Feb. 1984).
In re Quinlan, 355 A. 2d 647 (N.J. 1976).
Id.
Supra note 62.
Weber v. Stony Brook, 456 N.E. 2d 1186 (N.Y. 1983).
49 Fed. Reg. 1622 (Jan. 12, 1984).
Supra note 106, at 14.
Id. at 14, 15.
Id. at 17.
Id.
Id.
Id. at 15.
Id. at 16.
Id.
Id. at 19.
Id.
G. Smith, Genetics, Ethics and the Law, 2, 8 (1981).
Kennedy, Reflections on the Arthur Trial, 59 New Society 13 (Jan. 7, 1982).
Fletcher, Indicators of Humanhood: A Tentative Profile of Man, Hastings Center Rep. 1 (Nov. 1972).
R. McCormick, To Save or Let Die: The Dilemma of Modern Medicine in How Brave a New World, at 339 (R. McCormick ed. 1981).
R. Veatch, A Theory of Medical Ethics 244 (1981).
Id. at 245.
Lorber, Early Results of Selective Treatment of Spina Bifida Cystica, 4 Br. J. Med. 201, 203 (1973).
Draft, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission Guidelines, Department of Health, New South Wales, Australia, 1984. At the First Conference of Experts of the German Society for Medical Law held at Einbeck, West Germany, June 27–29, 1986, recommendations were developed that set limits on the duty to provide medical care for seriously defective newborns. In cases where severe, nonremedial deficiencies exist and death is certain (e.g., inoperable heart defects), and can only be postponed, or where the newborn will never have the possibility of communicating with his environment (e.g., microcephaly) or where the vital functions are only maintainable for any length by means of intensive medical intervention, the physician should not afford all available means for medical treatment to his patient.
Chervenak, Farley, Walters, Hobbins, & Mahoney, When IS Termination of Pregnancy During the Third Trimester Morally Justifiable?, 318 New Eng. J. Med. 591 (1984).
Id.
Id. at 502.
Id.
Id. at 503.
Young, Caring for Disabled Infants, Hastings Center Rep. 15 (Aug. 1983).
Id. at 16.
Id.
Strong, The Tiniest Newborns, Hastings Center Rep. 14 (Feb. 1983).
E. Kuge, The Practice of Death 191 (1975).
Supra note 135.
P. Ramsey, The Patient as Person viii (1970).
Supra note 100.
Dickens, The Modern Function and Limits of Parental Rights, 97 L. Q. Rev. 462 (1981).
Burger, Reflections on Law and Experimental Medicine in 1 Ethical, Legal and Social Challenges to a Brave New World at 211 (G. Smith ed. 1982).
50 Fed. Reg. 14878 (April 15, 1985).
Id. at 14881, 14883.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Murray, The Final, Anticlimatic Rule on Baby Doe, Hastings Center Rep. 5, 8 (June 1985).
Id. at 8.
Supra note 145, at 14889.
Id.
Supra note 150, at 8.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Bowen, Sec. of Health & Human Services v. American Hosp. Assoc, 476 U.S. 610, (1986).
Ala. Code §§ 26-15-1-26-15-4 (1975); Alaska Stat. § 47.10.010 (1962); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13.3673 (1956); Ark. Stat. Ann. § 42-807 (1977); Cal. Penal Code § 11165 (West 1980); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-6-401 (1973); Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-20 (1949); Del. Code Ann. tit. 31, § 301 (1974); D.C. Code Ann. § 6-2101 (1981); Fla. Stat. § 827.07 (1981); Ga. Code Ann. 74-111 (1933); Hawaii Rev. Stat. § 3501-1 (1976); Idaho Code § 16-1601 (1949); Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 23, § 2368 (1977); Ind. Code Ann. § 31-6-11-1 (Burns 1980); Iowa Code § 235 (1979); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-704 (1965); Ky. Rev. Stat. § 15-900 (1984); La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14.93 (West 1970); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. Tit. 19, § 218 (1964); Md. Pub. Safety Code Ann. § 35A (1973); Mass. Gen. Laws Ann., Ch. 273, § 1 (West 1975); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 722.622 (West 1983); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 626.556 (West 1962); Miss. Code Ann. § 43.19.1 (1972); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 210.110-210.165 (1982); Mont. Code Ann. § 10-503 (1977); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-707 (1979); Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.501-200.509 (1973); N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 169.38 (1955); N.J. Stat. Ann. § 26.24-4 (West 1982); N. M. Stat. Ann. § 30-6-1(c) (1978); N. Y. Social Services Law § 412 (McKinney 1983); N. C. Gen. Stat. § 14-318.2 (1981); N. D. Cent. Code § 50-25.1-02 (1982); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 29-1922 (1982); Okla. Stat. Ann. Tit. 21, § 843 (West 1983); Ore. Rev. Stat. § 418.770 (1983); Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 11, § 23 (Purdon 1965); R. I. Gen Laws § 40-11-2 (1956); S. C. Code Ann. § 20-7-10 (Law. Co-op 1976); S. D. Codified Laws Ann. § 26-10-10 (1984); Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1200 (1977); Tex. Family Code Ann. § 35.04 (Vernon 1975); Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-109 (1953); Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 13 § 2801 (1974); Va. Code § 63.1.248 (1950); Wash. Rev. Code § 26.44.020 (1974); W. Va. Code § 49-1-3 (1980); Wis. Stat. Ann. § 940.201 (West 1982); Wyo. Stat. § 6-4-504 (1977).
Pub. L. No. 98-457, 98 Stat. 1749, 42 U.S.C. §§ 201 et. seq. (1984). See also, C.F.R. § 1340.15 (1985).
45 C.F.R. § 1340.15(b)(2) (1985).
Id. Final regulations implementing the new requirements were published by the Department of Health and Human Services April 15, 1985. See 50 Fed. Reg. 14878 (1985).
Kopp & Grant, The “Small Beginnings” of Euthanasia: Examining the Erosion in Legal Prohibitions Against Mercy-Killing, 2 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub. Pol’y 585, 618 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, G.P. (1989). Medical, Legal, and Ethical Conundrums at the Edge of Life. In: The New Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0803-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0803-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0805-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0803-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive