Advertisement

The Abundance of Heterochrony in the Fossil Record

  • Kenneth J. McNamara
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 7)

Abstract

Paleontologists have long recognized that the fossil record seems to indicate a strong relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Any attempt to assess the nature of this relationship, however, is plagued by many problems, not the least of which are the dual specters of Ernst Haeckel and Walter Garstang, which have long haunted paleontologists. In the late 19th century the relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny was explained almost entirely in terms of recapitulation. In the same year that Haeckel proposed his biogenetic law, Hyatt (1866), working on fossil cephalopods, formulated a very similar scheme to interpret the evolutionary history of ammonoids. Hyatt’s ideas were to have a profound effect on many of his contemporary paleontologist colleagues and some of his students. For example, Jackson (1890, 1912) interpreted many aspects of bivalve and echinoid evolution in terms of recapitulation, as did Beecher (1893, 1987) on brachiopods and trilobites.

Keywords

Late Cretaceous Fossil Record Late Ordovician Fossil Vertebrate Cambrian Trilobite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberch, P., and Alberch, J., 1981. Heterochronic mechanisms of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical Salamander Bolitoglossa occidentalis (Amphibia: Plethodontidae), J. Morphol. 167:249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., and Wake, D. B., 1979, Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology 5: 296–317.Google Scholar
  3. Anstey, R. L., 1987, Astogeny and phylogeny: evolutionary heterochrony in Paleozoic bryozoans, Paleobiology 13: 20–43.Google Scholar
  4. Backhaus, E., 1959, Monographie der cretacischen Thecideidae (Brachiopoden), Mitt. Geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg 28: 5–90.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, P. G., 1983, The diminutive thecideidine brachiopod Enallothecida pygmaea (Moore) from the middle Jurassic of England, Palaeontology 26: 663–669.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, P. G., 1984, New evidence of a spiriferid ancestor for the Thecideidina (Brachiopoda), Palaeontology 27: 857–866.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, P. G., and Elston, D. G., 1984, A new polyseptate thecideacean brachiopod from the Middle Jurassic of the Cotswolds, England, Palaeontology 27: 777–791.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, P. G., and Laurie, K., 1978, Revision of Aptian thecideidine brachiopods of the Faringdon Sponge Gravels, Palaeontology 21: 555–570.Google Scholar
  9. Batten, R. L., 1975, The Scissurellidae—are they neotenously derived fissurellids? (Archaeogastropoda), Am. Mus. Novit. 2567: 1–29.Google Scholar
  10. Beecher, C. E., 1893, Some correlations of ontogeny and phylogeny in the Brachiopoda, Am. Nat. 27: 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beecher, C. E., 1987, Outline of a natural classification of the trilobites, Am. J. Sci. Ser. 4 3:89–106, 181-207.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, B. M., 1976, Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic development in the Class Edrioasteroidea (Echinodermata), J. Paleontol. 50:1001–1019.Google Scholar
  13. Bemis, W. E., 1984, Paedomorphosis and the evolution of the Dipnoi, Paleobiology 10: 293–307.Google Scholar
  14. Benton, M. J., 1984, Tooth form, growth, and function in Triassic rhynchosaurs (Reptilia, Rapsida), Palaeontology 27: 737–776.Google Scholar
  15. Berman, D. S., 1976a, Cranial morphology of the Lower Permian lungfish Gnathorhiza (Osteichthyes: Dipnoi), J. Paleontol. 50: 1020–1033.Google Scholar
  16. Berman, D. S., 1976b, A new amphisbaenian (Reptilia: Amphisbaenia) from the Oligocene-Miocene John Day Formation, Oregon, J. Paleontol. 50: 165–174.Google Scholar
  17. Bockelie, J. F., 1984, The Diploporita of the Oslo region, Norway, Palaeontology 27: 1–68.Google Scholar
  18. Bockelie, J. F., and Paul, C. R. C., 1983, Cyathotheca suecica and its bearing on the evolution of the Edrioasteroidea, Lethaia 16: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bolt, J. R., 1977, Dissorophoid relationships and ontogeny, and the origin of the Lissamphibia, J. Paleontol. 51: 235–249.Google Scholar
  20. Boy, J. A., 1971, Zur Problematik der Branchiosaurier (Amphibia, Karbon-Perm), Paläontol. Z. 45: 107–119.Google Scholar
  21. Boy, J. A., 1972, Die Branchiosaurier (Amphibia) des saarpfälzischen Rotliegenden (Perm, SW-Deutschland), Abh. Hess. Landesamt. Bodenforsch. 65: 1–137.Google Scholar
  22. Boy, J. A., 1978, Die tetrapodenfauna (Amphibia, Reptilia) des saarpfälzischen Rotliegenden (Unter-Perm; SW-Deutschland). I.Branchiosaurus, Mainzer Geowiss. Mitt. 7: 27–76.Google Scholar
  23. Boyd, M. J., 1980, The axial skeleton of the Carboniferous amphibian Pteroplax cornutus, Palaeontology 23: 273–285.Google Scholar
  24. Boyd, M. J., 1984, The Upper Carboniferous tetrapod assemblage from Newsham, Northumberland, Palaeontology 27: 367–392.Google Scholar
  25. Brasier, M. D., 1982, Architecture and evolution of the foraminiferid test—A theoretical approach, in: Aspects of Micropalaeontology (P. T. Bauner and A. R. Lord, eds.), pp. 1–41, Allen and Unwin, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brett, C. E., Frest, T. J., Sprinkle, J., and Clement, C. R., 1983, Coronoidea: A new class of blastozoan echinoderms based on taxonomic reevaluations of Strephanocrinus, J. Paleontol. 57: 627–651.Google Scholar
  27. Brezinski, D. K., 1986, An opportunistic Upper Ordovician trilobite assemblage from Missouri, Lethaia 19: 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Broadhead, T. W., and McComb, R., 1983, Paedomorphosis in the conodont family Icriodontidae and the evolution of Icriodus, Fossils Strata 15: 149–154.Google Scholar
  29. Brower, J. C., 1976, Promelocrinus from the Wenlock at Dudley, Palaeontology 19: 651–680.Google Scholar
  30. Brown, D. S., 1981, The English Upper Jurassic Plesiosauridea (Reptilia) and a review of the phylogeny and classification of the Plesiosauria, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.) 35: 253–347.Google Scholar
  31. Carroll, R. L., 1977, Patterns of amphibian evolution: an extended example of the incompleteness of the fossil record, in: Patterns of Evolution, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record (A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 405–437, Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Carroll, R. L., and Thompson, P., 1982, A bipedal lizardlike reptile from the Karroo, J. Paleontol. 56: 1–10.Google Scholar
  33. Carruthers, R. G., 1910, On the evolution of Zaphrentis delanouei in Lower Carboniferous times, Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 264: 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chatterton, B. D. E., and Perry, D. G., 1983, Silicified Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from the MacKenzie Mountains, Palaeontogr. Can. 1: 1–126.Google Scholar
  35. Clarkson, E. N. K., 1979, The visual system of trilobites, Palaeontology 22: 1–22.Google Scholar
  36. Cope, J. C. W., 1978, The ammonite faunas and stratigraphy of the upper part of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset, Palaeontology 21: 469–533.Google Scholar
  37. Copper, P., 1982, Early Silurian atrypoids from Manitoulin Island and Bruce Peninsula, Ontario, J. Paleontol. 56: 680–702.Google Scholar
  38. Credner, H., 1882–1893, Die Stegocephalen und Saurier aus dem Rothliegenden des Plauenschen Grundes bei Dresden, Z. Deutsch. Geol. Ges. III (34), IV (35), V, (37), VI (38), IX (42), X (35).Google Scholar
  39. Dommergues, J.-L., 1986, Les Dactylioceratidae du Carixien et du Domerian basai, un groupe monophyletique. Les Reynesocoeloceratinae nov. subfam. Bull. Sei. Bourg. 39: 1–26.Google Scholar
  40. Dommergues, J. L., David, B., and Marchand, D., 1986, Les relations ontogenèse-phylogenèse: applications paléontologiques, Geobios 19: 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Donnovan, D. T., 1973, The influence of theoretical ideas on ammonite classification from Hyatt to Trueman, Paleontol. Contrib. Univ. Kansas 62: 1–16.Google Scholar
  42. Dzik, J., 1975, The origin and early phylogeny of the cheilostomatous bryozoa, Acta. Paleontol. Pol. 20: 395–423.Google Scholar
  43. Dzik, J., 1981, Evolutionary relationships of the early Palaeozoic ‘cyclostomatous’ bryozoa, Palaeontology 24: 827–861.Google Scholar
  44. Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E., 1987, Heterochrony in the Silurian radiation of encrinurine trilobites, Lethaia 20: 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Elles, G. L., 1923, Evolutionary palaeontology in relation to the Lower Palaeozoic rocks, Rep. Br. Assoc. Adv. Sei. 91: 83–107.Google Scholar
  46. Elliott, D. K., 1984, A new subfamily of the Pteraspididae (Agnatha, Heterostraci) from the Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian of Arctic Canada, Palaeontology 27: 169–197.Google Scholar
  47. Estes, R., 1969, The fossil record of amphiurid salamanders, Breviora 322: 1–11.Google Scholar
  48. Fink, W. L., 1982, The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology 8: 254–264.Google Scholar
  49. Finney, S. C., 1986, Heterochrony, punctuated equilibrium, and graptolite zonal boundaries, in: Palaeoecology and Biostratigraphy of Graptolites (C. P. Hughes and R. B. Rickards, eds.) pp. 103-113, Geological Society Special Publication No. 20.Google Scholar
  50. Fortey, R. A., 1974, The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen I Olenidae, Norsk Polarinstitutt 160: 1–81.Google Scholar
  51. Fortey, R. A., 1975, The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen II Asaphidae, Nileidae, Raphiophoridae and Telephinidae of the Valhallfonna Formation, Norsk Polarinstitutt 162: 1–124.Google Scholar
  52. Fortey, R. A., and Rushton, A. W. A., 1980, Acanthopleurella Groom 1902: Origin and life-habits of a miniature trilobite, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat Hist. (Geol) 33: 79–89.Google Scholar
  53. Fortey, R. A., and Shergold, J. H., 1984, Early Ordovician trilobites, Nova Formation, central Australia, Palaeontology 27: 315–366.Google Scholar
  54. Frest, T. J., Strimple, H. L., and McGinnis, M. R., 1979, Two new crinoids from the Ordovician of Virginia and Oklahoma, with notes on pinnulation in the Disparida, J. Paleontol. 53: 399–415.Google Scholar
  55. Garstang, W., 1922, The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the biogenetic law, J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 35: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Garstang, W., 1928, The morphology of the Tunicata, and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Q. J. Microscop. Sci. 72: 51–187.Google Scholar
  57. Gawne, C. E., 1978, Leporids (Lagomorpha, Mammalia) from the Chadronian (Oligocene) deposits of Flagstaff Rim, Wyoming, J. Paleontol. 52: 1103–1118.Google Scholar
  58. Gould, S. J., 1969, An evolutionary microcosm: Pleistocene and Recent history of the land snail P. (Poecilozonites) in Bermuda, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 138: 407–532.Google Scholar
  59. Gould, S. J., 1974, The evolutionary significance of “bizarre” structures: antler size and skull size in the “Irish Elk,” Megaloceros giganteus, Evolution 28: 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gould, S. J., 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  61. Gramm, M. N., 1973, Cases of neoteny in fossil ostracodes, Paleontol. J. 1: 3–12.Google Scholar
  62. Gramm, M. N., 1985, The muscle scar in cavellinids and its importance for the phylogeny of platycope ostracodes, Lethaia 18: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hallam, A., 1978, How rare is phyletic gradualism and what is its evolutionary significance? Paleobiology 4:16–25.Google Scholar
  64. Hallam, A., 1982, Patterns of speciation in Jurassic Gryphaea, Paleobiology 8: 354–366.Google Scholar
  65. Henderson, R. A., and McNamara, K. J., 1985, Maastrichtian non-heteromorph ammonites from the Miria Formation, Western Australia, PalaeontoJogy 28: 35–88.Google Scholar
  66. Highsmith, R. C., 1982, Reproduction by fragmentation in corals, Mar. EcoJ. Progr. Ser. 7: 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Holmes, R., 1980, Proterogyrinus scheeli and the early evolution of the labyrinthodont pectoral limb, in: The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates (A. L. Panchen, ed.), pp. 351-376, Systematics Association Special Volume 15.Google Scholar
  68. Hopson, J. A. 1977, Relative brain size and behaviour in archrosaurian reptiles, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8:429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hughes, C. P., Ingham, J. K., and Addison, R., 1975, The morphology, classification and evolution of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita), Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 537–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hupé, P., 1953, Contribution à l’etûde du Cambrien Inférieur et du Précambrien III de l’Anti-Atlas Marocain, Notes Mem. Serv. Min. Carte Géol. Maroc. 103: 1–402.Google Scholar
  71. Hyatt, A., 1866, On the agreement between the different periods in the life of the individual shell and the collective life of the tetrabranchiate cephalopods, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 10: 302–303.Google Scholar
  72. Ingham, J. K., 1970, A monograph of the upper Ordovician trilobites from the Cautley and Dent districts of Westmorland and Yorkshire, Palaeontol. Soc. [Monogr.] 7: 1–58.Google Scholar
  73. Jackson, R. T., 1890, Phylogeny of the Pelecypoda: the Aviculidae and their allies, Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 4(8): 277–400.Google Scholar
  74. Jackson, R. T., 1912, Phylogeny of the Echini, with a review of Palaeozoic species,Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 7: 1–443.Google Scholar
  75. James, H. F., and Olson, S. L. 1983, Flightless birds, Nat. Hist. 92(9):30–40.Google Scholar
  76. Joffe, J., 1967, The ‘dwarf crocodiles of the Purbeck Formation’, Dorset: a reappraisal, Palaeontology 10: 629–639.Google Scholar
  77. Jones, B., 1979, Atrypoidea erebus n. sp. from the Late Silurian of Arctic Canada, J. Paleontol. 53:187–196.Google Scholar
  78. Jull, R. K., 1976, Septal development during hystero-ontogeny in the Ordovician tabulate coral Foerstephyllum, J. Paleontol. 50: 380–391.Google Scholar
  79. Kennedy, W. J., 1977, Ammonite evolution, in Patterns of Evolution, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record (A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 251–304, Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kennedy, W. J., and Cooper, M. R., 1977, The micromorph Albian ammonite Falloticeras Parona and Bonarelli, Palaeontology 20: 793–804.Google Scholar
  81. Kennedy, W. J., and Wright, C. W., 1981, Euhystrichoceras and Algericeras, the last mortoniceratine ammonites, Palaeontology 24: 417–435.Google Scholar
  82. Kolata, D. R., Strimple, H. L., and Levorson, C. O., 1977, Revision of the Ordovician carpoid family Iowacystidae, Palaeontology 20: 529–557.Google Scholar
  83. Laerm, J., 1979, On the origin of rhipidistian vertebrae, J. Paleontol. 53: 175–186.Google Scholar
  84. Laerm, J., 1982, The origin and homology of the neopterygian vertebral column, J. Paleontol. 56: 191–202.Google Scholar
  85. Lane, N. G., and Sevastopulo, G. D., 1982, Microcrinoids from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Indiana, J. Paleontol. 56: 103–115.Google Scholar
  86. Lane, N. G., Sevastopulo, G. D., and Strimple, H. L., 1985, Amphipsalidocrinus: A monocyclic camerate microcrinoid, J. Paleontol. 59: 79–84.Google Scholar
  87. Langston, W., and Rose, H., 1978, A yearling crocodilian from the Middle Eocene Green River Formation of Colorado, J. Paleontol. 52: 122–125.Google Scholar
  88. Levinton, J. S., 1983, Stasis in progress: the empirical basis of macroevolution, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 103–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lidgard, S., 1985, Zooid and colony growth in encrusting cheilostome bryozoans, Palaeontology 28: 255–291.Google Scholar
  90. Lockley, M. G., 1983, A review of brachiopod dominated palaeocommunities from the type Ordovician, Palaeontology 26: 111–145.Google Scholar
  91. Lu Yan-Hao and Wu Hong-Ji, 1983, Ontogeny of the trilobite Dalmanitina (Dalmanitina) nanchengensis Lu, Palaeontologia Cathayana 1: 123–144.Google Scholar
  92. Ludvigsen, R., 1979, The Ordovician trilobite Pseudogygites Kobayashi in eastern and arctic North America, Life Sci. Contrib. R. Ont. Mus. 120: 1–41.Google Scholar
  93. Lund, R., and Melton, W. G., 1982, A new actinopterygian fish from the Mississippian Bear Gulch Limestone of Montana, Palaeontology 25: 485–498.Google Scholar
  94. Maglio, V. J., 1972, Evolution of mastication in the Elephantidae, Evolution 26: 638–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Maglio, V. J., 1973, Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae, Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 63(3): 1–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Maisey, J. G., 1978, Growth and form of finspines in hybodont spines, Palaeontology 21: 657–666.Google Scholar
  97. Majima, R., 1985, Intraspecific variation in three species of Glossaulax (Gastropoda: Naticidae) from the Late Caenozoic strata in central and southwest Japan, Trans. Proc. Palaeontol. Soc. Japan N.S. 138: 111–137.Google Scholar
  98. Mancini, E. A., 1978a, Origin of micromorph faunas in the geologic record, J. Paleontol. 52: 311–322.Google Scholar
  99. Mancini, E. A., 1978b, Origin of the Grayson micromorph fauna (Upper Cretaceous) of north-central Texas, J. Paleontol 52: 1294–1314.Google Scholar
  100. McGowan, C., 1986, A putative ancestor for the sword-like ichthyosaur Eurhinosaurus, Nature 322: 454–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. McHargue, T. R., 1982, Ontogeny, phylogeny, and apparatus reconstruction of the conodont genus Histiodella, Joins Fm., Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma, J. Paleontol. 56: 1410–1433.Google Scholar
  102. Mclntosh, G. C., 1979, Abnormal specimens of the Middle Devonian crinoid Bactrocrinites and their effect on the taxonomy of the genus, J. Paleontol. 53: 18–28.Google Scholar
  103. McKinney, M. L., 1984, Allometry and heterochrony in an Eocene echinoid lineage: morphological change as a by-product of size selection, Paleobiology 10: 407–419.Google Scholar
  104. McKinney, M. L., 1986, Ecological causation of heterochrony: test and implications for evolutionary theory, Paleobiology 12: 282–289.Google Scholar
  105. McKinney, M. L., and Schoch, R. M., 1985, Titanothere allometry, heterochrony, and biomechanics: revising an evolutionary classic, Evolution 39: 1352–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. McLean, J. H., 1984, A case for derivation of the Fissurellidae from the Bellerophontacea, Malacologia 25: 3–20.Google Scholar
  107. McNamara, K. J., 1978, Paedomorphosis in Scottish olenellid trilobites (Early Cambrian), Palaeontology 21: 635–655.Google Scholar
  108. McNamara, K. J., 1979, Trilobites from the Coniston Limestone Group (Ashgill Series) of the Lake District, England, Palaeontology 22: 53–92.Google Scholar
  109. McNamara, K. J., 1981a, Paedomorphosis in Middle Cambrian xystridurine trilobites from northern Australia, Alcheringa 5: 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. McNamara, K. J., 1981b, The Role of Paedomorphosis in the Evolution of Cambrian Trilobites, Open-File Report of the U.S. Geological Survey No. 81-743, pp. 126-129.Google Scholar
  111. McNamara, K. J., 1982a, Heterochrony and phylogenetic trends, Paleobiology 8: 130–142.Google Scholar
  112. McNamara, K. J., 1982b, Taxonomy and evolution of living species of Breynia (Echinoidea: Spatangoida) from Australia, Rec. West. Aust. Mus 10:167–197.Google Scholar
  113. McNamara, K. J., 1983b, The earliest Tegulorhynchia (Brachiopoda: Rhynchonellida) and its evolutionary significance, J. Paleontol. 57: 461–473.Google Scholar
  114. McNamara, K. J., 1984, Observations on the light-sensitive tube feet of the burrowing echinoid Protenaster austra Jis (Gray, 1851), Rec. West. Aust. Mus. 11: 411–420.Google Scholar
  115. McNamara, K. J., 1985a, Taxonomy and evolution of the Cainozoic spatangoid echinoid Protenaster, Palaeontology 28: 311–330.Google Scholar
  116. McNamara, K. J., 1985b, A new micromorph ammonite genus from the Albian of South Australia, Spec. Publ. S. Aust. Dep. Mines Energy 5: 263–268.Google Scholar
  117. McNamara, K. J., 1986a, A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony, J. Paleontol. 60: 4–13.Google Scholar
  118. McNamara, K. J., 1986b, The role of heterochrony in the evolution of Cambrian trilobites, Biol. Rev. 61: 121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. McNamara, K. J., 1987a, Taxonomy, evolution, and functional morphology of southern Australian Tertiary hemiasterid echinoids, Palaeontology 30: 319–352.Google Scholar
  120. McNamara, K. J., 1987b, Heterochrony and the evolution of echinoids, in: Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology of Echinoderms (C. R. C. Paul and A. B. Smith, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  121. McNamara, K. J., 1987c, The role of heterochrony in the evolution of spatangoid echinoids, in: Ontogenèse et Evolution (J. Chaline et al., eds.), CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
  122. McNamara, K. J., and Philip, G. M., 1980a, Australian Tertiary schizasterid echinoids. Alcheringa 4:47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. McNamara, K. J., and Philip, G. M., 1980b, Tertiary species of Echinolampas (Echinoidea) from southern Australia, Mem. Nat Mus. Vict. 41: 1–14.Google Scholar
  124. McNamara, K. J., and Philip, G. M., 1984, A revision of the spatangoid echinoid Pericosmus from the Tertiary of Australia, Rec. West Aust. Mus. 11: 319–356.Google Scholar
  125. Meinke, D. K., and Thomson, K. S., 1983, The distribution and significance of enamel and enameloid in the dermal skeleton of osteolepiform rhipidistian fishes, Paleobiology 9: 138–149.Google Scholar
  126. Merrill, G. K., 1972, Taxonomy, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of Neognathodus in Appalachian Pennsylvanian rocks, J. Paleontol. 46: 817–829.Google Scholar
  127. Merrill, G. K., and Powell, R. J., 1980, Paleobiology of juvenile (nepionic?) conodonts from the Drum Limestone (Pennsylvanian, Missourian-Kansas City area) and its bearing on apparatus ontogeny, J. Paleontol. 54: 1058–1074.Google Scholar
  128. Millendorf, S. A., 1979, The functional morphology and life habits of the Devonian blastoid Eleuth-erocrinus cassedayi Shumard and Yandell, J. Paleontol. 53: 553–561.Google Scholar
  129. Milner, A. R., 1980a, The temnospondyl amphibian Dendrerpeton from the Upper Carboniferous of Ireland, Palaeontology 23: 125–141.Google Scholar
  130. Milner, A. R., 1980b, The tetrapod assemblage from Nyrany, Czechoslovakia, in: The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates (A. L. Panchen, ed.), pp. 439-496, Systematics Association Special Volume 15.Google Scholar
  131. Milner, A. R., 1982, Small temnospondyl amphibians from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Illinois, Palaeontology 25: 635–664.Google Scholar
  132. Milner, A. R., Smithson, T. R., Milner, A. C., Coates, M. I., and Rolfe, W. D. I., 1986, The search for early tetrapods, Modern Geology 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
  133. Miyazaki, J. M., and Mickevich, M. F., 1982, Evolution of Chesapecten (Mollusca: Bivalvia, Miocene-Pliocene) and the biogenetic law, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 15 (M. K. Hecht, B. Wallace, and R. Prance, eds.), pp. 368–409, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  134. Morescalchi, A., 1979, New developments in vertebrate cytotaxonomy. I. Cytotaxonomy of the amphibians, Genetica 50: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Morescalchi, A., and Serra, V., 1974, DNA renaturation kinetics in some paedogenetic urodeles, Experientia 30: 487–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Mosher, L. C., 1973, Evolutionary, ecologic and geographic observations on conodonts during their decline and extinction, Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 141: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Nelson, G. J., 1978, Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the biogenetic law, Syst. Zool. 27: 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Olson, E. C., 1951, Diplocaulus, a study in growth and variation, Fieldiana: Geol. 11(2):57–154.Google Scholar
  139. Olson, E. C., 1979, Aspects of the biology of Trimerorhacis (Amphibia: Temnospondyli), J. Paleontol. 53: 1017.Google Scholar
  140. Owen, A. W., 1980, The trilobite Tretaspis from the Upper Ordovician of the Oslo region, Norway, Palaeontology 23: 715–747.Google Scholar
  141. Pajaud, D., 1970, Monographies des Thecidees (Brachiopodes), Mem. Soc. Geol. Fr. (N.S.) 49(112): 1–349.Google Scholar
  142. Paul, C. R. C., 1985, The adequacy of the fossil record reconsidered, Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 33: 7–15.Google Scholar
  143. Phelan, T. F., 1977, Comments on the water vascular system, food grooves, and ancestry of the clypeasteroid echinoids, Bull. Mar. Sci. 27: 400–422.Google Scholar
  144. Philip, G. M., Two Australian Tertiary neolampadids, and the classification of cassiduloid echinoids, Palaeontology 6:718-726.Google Scholar
  145. Podell, M. E., and Anstey, R. L., 1979, The interrelationship of early colony development, monticules and branches in Paleozoic bryozoans. Palaeontology 22: 965–982.Google Scholar
  146. Rackoff, J. S., 1980, The origin of the tetrapod limb and the ancestry of tetrapods, in: The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates (A. L. Panchen ed.), pp. 255-292, Systematics Association Special Volume 15.Google Scholar
  147. Radinsky, L. B., 1984, Ontogeny and phylogeny in horse skull evolution, Evolution 38: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Raff, R. A., Anstrom, J. A., Huffman, C. J., Leaf, D. S., Loo, J.-H., Showman, R. M., and Wells, D. E., 1984, Origin of a gene regulatory mechanism in the evolution of echinoderms, Nature 310: 312–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Rickards, R. B., 1977, Patterns of evolution in the graptolites, in: Patterns of Evolution, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record (A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 333–358, Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Robison, R. A., 1967, Ontogeny of Bathyuriscus fimbriatus and its bearing on affinities of corynexochid trilobites, J. Paleontol. 41: 213–221.Google Scholar
  151. Robison, R. A., and Campbell, D. P., 1974, A Cambrian corynexochoid trilobite with only two thoracic segments, Lethaia 7: 173–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Rudwick, M. J. S., 1968, The feeding mechanisms and affinities of the Triassic brachiopods Thecospira Zugmayer and Bactrynium Emmrich, Palaeontology 11: 329–360.Google Scholar
  153. Schopf, T. J. M.,; 1977, Patterns and themes of evolution among Bryozoa, in: Patterns of Evolution, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record (A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 159–207, Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Schram, F. R., and Rolfe, W. D. I, 1982, New euthycarcinoid arthropods from the Upper Pennsylvanian of France and Illinois, J. Paleontol. 56: 1434–1450.Google Scholar
  155. Schultze, H.-P., 1984, Juvenile specimens of Eusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves, 1881 (Osteolepiform Rhipidistian, Pisces) from the late Devonian of Miguasha, Quebec, Canada, J. Vert. Paleontol. 4: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Schultze, H.-P. and Arsenault, M., 1985, The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege; a close relative of tetrapods?, Palaeontology 28: 293–309.Google Scholar
  157. Scott, G. H., 1982, Tempo and stratigraphic record of speciation in Globorotalia puncticulata, J Foram. Res. 12: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Siveter, D. J., 1979, Metacalymene Kegel, 1927, a calymenid trilobite from the Kopanina Formation (Silurian) of Bohemia, J. Paleontol. 53: 367–379.Google Scholar
  159. Siveter, D. J., 1980, Evolution of the Silurian trilobite Tapinocalymene from the Wenlock of the Welsh Borderland, Palaeontology 23: 783–802.Google Scholar
  160. Smith, A. B., 1981, Implications of lantern morphology for the phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic echinoids, Palaeontology 24: 779–801.Google Scholar
  161. Smith, A. B., 1985, Cambrian eleutherozoan echinoderms and the early diversification of edrioasteroids, Palaeontology 28: 715–756.Google Scholar
  162. Smith, J. P., 1914, Acceleration of Development in Fossil Cephalopoda, Leland Stanford Junior University Publications University Series, pp. 1-30, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  163. Snyder, J., and Bretsky, P. W., 1971, Life habits of diminutive bivalve molluscs in the Maquoketa Formation (Upper Ordovician), Am. J. Sci. 271: 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Spencer, W. K., and Wright, C. W., 1966, Asterozoans, in: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part V, Echinodermata 3 (R. C. Moore, ed.), pp. U5-U107, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  165. Sprinkle, J., 1980, Origin of blastoids: new look at an old problem, in: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 12, No. 7, p. 528.Google Scholar
  166. Sprinkle, J., and Bell, B. M., 1978, Paedomorphosis in edrioasteroid echinoderms, Paleobiology 4: 82–88.Google Scholar
  167. Stanley, S. M., 1972, Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve mollusks, J. Paleontol. 46: 165–212.Google Scholar
  168. Sullivan, R. M., 1979, Revision of the Paleogene genus Glyptosaurus (Reptilia, Anguidae), Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 163: 1–72.Google Scholar
  169. Surlyk, F., 1972, Morphological adaptations and population structures of the Danish chalk brachiopods (Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous), Biol. Skr. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 19: 1–57.Google Scholar
  170. Taylor, P. D., and Furness, R. W., 1978, Astogenetic and environmental variation in zooid size within colonies of Jurassic Stomatopora (Bryozoa, Cyclostomata), J. Paleontol. 52: 1093–1102.Google Scholar
  171. Tharalson, D. B., 1984, Revision of the Early Permian ammonoid family Perrinitidae, J. Paleontol. 58: 804–833.Google Scholar
  172. Thulborn, R. A., 1985, Birds as neotenous dinosaurs, Rec. N. Z. Geol. Surv. 9: 90–92.Google Scholar
  173. Urbanek, A., 1960. An attempt at biological interpretation of evolutionary changes in graptolite colonies, Acta Palentol. Pol 5:127–233.Google Scholar
  174. Urbanek, A., 1973, Organisation and evolution of graptolite colonies, in: Animal Colonies (R. S. Boardman, A. H. Cheetham, and W. A. Oliver, eds.), pp. 441–514, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  175. Waller, T. R., 1986, The evolution of ligament systems in the Bivalvia, Am. Malacol. Bull. (4) 1986: 111–112.Google Scholar
  176. Ward, P. D., and Mallory, V. S., 1977, Taxonomy and evolution of the lytoceratid genus Pseudoxybeloceras and relationship to the genus Solenoceras, J. Paleontol. 51: 606–618.Google Scholar
  177. Waters, J. A., Horowitz, A. S., and Macurda, D. B., 1985, Ontogeny and phylogeny of the Carboniferous blastoid Pentremites, J. Paleontol. 59: 701–712.Google Scholar
  178. Watson, D. M. S., 1926, The evolution and origin of the Amphibia, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 214: 189–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Werdelin, L., and Long, J. A., 1986, Allometry in the placoderm BothrioJepis canadensis and its significance to antiarch evolution, Lethaia 19: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Westoll, T. S., 1980, Prologue: problems of tetrapod origin, in: The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates (A. L. Panchen, ed.) pp. 1-10, Systematics Association Special Volume 15.Google Scholar
  181. White, E. L, 1958, Original environment of the craniates, in: Studies on Fossil Vertebrates (T. S. Westoll, ed.), pp. 212–234, Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
  182. Wiedmann, J., and Kullmann, J., 1980, Ammonoid sutures in ontogeny and phylogeny, in: The Ammonoidea (M. R. House and J. R. Senior, eds.), pp. 215-255, Systematics Association Special Volume 18.Google Scholar
  183. Williams, A., 1973, The secretion and structural evolution of the shell of thecideidine brachiopods, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264: 439–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Williams, A., and Hurst, J. M., 1977, Brachiopod evolution, in: Patterns of Evolutions, As Illustrated by the Fossil Record [A. Hallam, ed.), pp. 79–121, Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Williams, A., and McKay, S., 1979, Differentiation of the brachiopod periostracum, Palaeontology 22: 721–736.Google Scholar
  186. Wright, C. W., and Kennedy, W. J., 1979, Origin and evolution of the Cretaceous micromorph ammonite family Flickiidae, Palaeontology 22: 685–704.Google Scholar
  187. Wright, C. W., and Kennedy, W. J., 1980, Origin, evolution and systematics of the dwarf acanthoceratid Protacanthoceras Spath, 1923 (Cretaceous Ammonoidea), Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.J 34: 65–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth J. McNamara
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Australian MuseumPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations