Assessing the Quality of Living Environments

  • Michael L. Jones
Part of the Current Issues in Autism book series (CIAM)

Abstract

Traditional theories of autism treat behavior disorders and delayed development as symptoms of internal deficits. These deficits have been expressed in terms of physiological factors (e.g., brain pathology) or hypothetical concepts of information processing (e.g., sensory overload). Most theories further stipulate, however, that the correlation between symptoms and internal deficits is not perfect because of the mediating role of the environment. Environmental factors must be acknowledged to account for the fact that an individual with a mild deficiency, reared in a depriving environment, might show severe developmental delay (Bijou & Dunitz-Johnson, 1981).

Keywords

Disruptive Behavior Activity Zone Developmental Disability Apply Behavior Analysis Treatment Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijou, S. W., & Dunitz-Johnson, E. (1981). Inter-behavioral analysis of developmental retardation. The Psychological Record, 31, 305–29.Google Scholar
  2. Crosby, K. G. (1976). Essentials of active programming. Mental Retardation. 14(2), 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Favell, J. E., & Cannon, P. R. (1977). Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(4), 357–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iwata, B., Dorsey M., Slifer, K., Bauman K., & Richman, G. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones, M. L., Favell, J. E., & Risley, T. R. (1983). Socioecological programming. In J. Matson & F. Andrasik (Eds.) Treatment issues and innovations in mental retardation. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, M. L., Favell, J. E., Lattimore, J., & Risley, T. R. (1984). Improving independent engagement of nonambulatory multihandicapped persons through the systematic analysis of leisure materials. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities. 4, 313–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, M. L., Risley, T. R., & Favell, J. E. (1984). Ecological patterns: An ecobehavioral perspective in assessment. In J. L. Matson & S. Breuning (Eds.), Assessing the mentally retarded. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, M. L., & Risley, T. R. (1984). Procedures for the MANIFEST Observation System. Lawrence, KS: Living Environments Group.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, M. L., Lattimore, J., Ulicny, G. R., & Risley, T. R. (1986). Programming for engagement; Environmental design to control behavior disorders. In R. P. Barret (Ed.), Treatment of severe behavior disorders: Contemporary approaches with the mentally retarded (pp. 123–55). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  11. Klesges, R. D., Woolfrey, J., & Vollmer, J. (1985). Am evaluation of the reliability of time sampling versus continuous observation data collection. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 16, 303–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krick, E. V. (1962). Methods engineering. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. LeLaurin, K., & Risley, T. R. (1972). The organization of day-care environments: “Zone” verses “man-to-man” staff assignments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 225–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montes, F., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Evaluating traditional day care practices: An empirical approach. Child Care Quarterly, 4, 208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McWilliam, R. A., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, C. J. (1985). Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Porterfield, J. K., Herbert-Jackson, E., & Risley, T. R. (1976). Contingent observation: An effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behaviors of young children in group settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 55–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.Google Scholar
  18. Twardosz, S., Cataldo, M., & Risley, T. (1974). Open environment design for infant and toddler day care. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 529–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Child ResearchUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations