Advertisement

The Pine Beauty in Scottish Lodgepole Pine Plantations

  • Allan D. Watt
  • Simon R. Leather
Part of the Population Ecology book series (POPE)

Abstract

The pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea Denis and Schiffermuller (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a pest of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in Scotland. This indigenous species has a widespread distribution throughout the United Kingdom and Europe on its natural host plant, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). In the British Isles, very low densities of P. flammea are normally found in Scots pine plantations, the average density being about 0.1 pupae m −2, and densities above 0.3 pupae m −2 being rare.6 However, serious outbreaks have been recorded on Scots pine in central Europe from 1810 onward,20 and it is thought likely that P. flammea was the pest responsible for serious damage in Nurnberg during 1449–1450.9 Pine beauty moth outbreaks have also occurred on Scots pine in Sweden,29 Norway,4 and Finland.35

Keywords

Natural Enemy Intraspecific Competition Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Highland Region Forestry Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adlung, K. G., 1960, A critical evaluation of the European research on use of red wood ants (Formica rufa Group) for the protection of forests against harmful insects, Z. Angew. Entomol. 57: 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aldhous, J. R., 1976, Lodgepole pine seed zones with reference to British requirements, in: Pinus contorta Provenance Studies, (R. Lines, ed.), pp. 6–39, Forestry Commission Research and Development Paper 114, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anonymous, 1984, Census of Woodlands and Trees 1979–1982, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Austarâ, O.,1982, Survey of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea in Norway in 1980 and 1981 using traps with synthetic pheromone analogues, Fauna Norv. Ser. B 29:105–109.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbour, D. A., 1985, Panolis life-table study, Report to the Forestry Commission (unpublished).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbour, D. A., 1987, Pine beauty moth population dynamics: General considerations and the life table work, in: Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth (Panolis flammea) (S. R. Leather, J. T. Stoakley, and H. F. Evans, eds.), pp. 7–13, Forestry Commission Bulletin 67, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berryman, A. A., 1982, Biological control, thresholds, and pest outbreaks, Environ. Entomol. 11: 544–549.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berryman, A. A., and Stark, R. W., 1985, Assessing the risk of forest insect outbreaks, Z. Angew. Entomol. 99: 199–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berwig, W., 1926, Die Forleule in Bayern. Historisch-statistisch-klimatologische Betrachtung, Fw. Ctrbl. 70: 165–181.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van den Bos, J., and Rabbinge, R., 1976, Simulations of the Fluctuations of the Grey Larch Bud Moth, Wageningen, Pudoc.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Britton, R. J., 1985, Effects of defoliation by Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.) on the growth of young crops of Pinus contorta Dougl., PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dempster, J. P., and Pollard, E., 1981, Fluctuations in resource availability and insect populations, Oecologia (Berl.) 50: 412–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eidmann, H., 1928. Eizahl and eireifung einiger forstlich wichtiger Schmetterlinge, Z. Angew. Entomol. 13: 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eidmann, H., 1929, Morphologische and physiologische untersuchungen am weiblichen genitalapparat der lepidopteren. I. Morphologischer teil, Z. Angew. Entomol. 15: 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Entwistle, P. F., and Evans, H. F., 1986, Trials on the control of Panolis flammea with a nuclear polyhedrosis virus, in: Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth (Panolis flammea) (S. R. Leather, J. T. Stoaldey, and H. F. Evans, eds.), pp. 61–68, Forestry Commission Bulletin 67, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esherich, K., 1931, Die Forstinsekten Mitteleuropas, 3. Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forrest, G. I., 1980, Geographical variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleroresin, Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 8: 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenbank, D. O., Schaefer, G. W., and Rainey, R. C., 1980, Spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) moth flight and dispersal: New understanding from canopy observations, radar and aircraft, Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 110: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hart, G., and Lull, H. W., 1963, Some relationships among air, snow and soil temperatures and soil frost, U.S. Forest Service Research Note NE-3, 1–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klimetzek, D., 1979. Insekten-Grosschadlinge an Kiefer in Nordbayern und der Pfalz: Analyse und Vergleich 1810–1970, Institut fur Forstzoologie, Freiburg.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leather, S. R., 1984, The effect of adult feeding on the fecundity, weight loss and survival of the pine beauty moth. Panolis flammea (D & S), Oecologia (Berl.) 65: 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leather, S. R., 1984, Factors affecting pupal survival and eclosion in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D & S), Oecologia (Berl.) 63: 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leather, S. R., 1985, Oviposition preferences in relation to larval growth rates and survival in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea, Ecol. Entomol. 10: 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leather, S. R., 1987, Pine monoterpenes stimulate oviposition in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43: 295–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leather, S. R., 1987, Lodgepole pine provenance and the pine beauty moth, in: Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth, (S.R. Leather, J. T. Stoakley, and H. F. Evans, eds.), pp. 27–30, Forestry Commission Bulletin 67, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leather, S. R., and Barbour, D. A., 1983, The effect of temperature on the emergence of pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea Schiff. (Lep., Noctuidae), Z. Angew. Entomol. 96: 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leather, S. R., Watt, A. D., and Barbour, D. A., 1985, The effect of host plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and lifespan of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Denis and Schiffermuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management, Bull. Entomol. Res. 75: 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leather, S. R., Watt, A. D., and Forrest, G. I., 1987, Insect-induced chemical defences in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta): The effect of previous defoliation on oviposition and growth and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D & S), Ecol. Entomol. 12: 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lekander, B., 1954, Skoginsektemas upptradande i Sverige under tiden 1946–50, Medd. Stat. Skogforskinst 44: 1–46.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lines, R., 1976, The development of forestry in Scotland in relation to the use of Pinus contorta, in: Pinus contorta Provenance Studies (R. Lines, ed.), pp. 2–5, Forestry Commission Research and Development Paper 114, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer, E., 1931, Beobachtungen and untersuchungen zur biologie and bekampfung der forleule, Z. Angew. Entomol. 18: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peterman, R. M., Clark, W. C., and Holling, C. S., 1979, The dynamics of resilience: Shifting stability domains in fish and insect systems, in: Population Dynamics ( R. M. Anderson, B. D. Turner, and L. R. Taylor, eds.), pp. 321–341, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pollard, E., 1981, Resource limited and equilibrium models of populations, Oecologia (Berl.) 49: 377–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rhoades, D. F., 1983, Herbivore population and plant chemistry, in: Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems ( R. F. Denno and M. S. McClure, eds.), pp. 155–220, Academic, London.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saalas, V., 1949, Suomen Metsahyonteiset, Werner Soderstrom OY, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schwenke, W., 1978, Die Forstschadlinge Europas. Vol. 3: Schmetterlinge, Paul Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Southwood, T. R. E., and Comins, H. N., 1976, A synoptic population model, J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 949–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stoakley, J. T., 1977, A severe outbreak of the pine beauty moth on lodgepole pine in Sutherland, Scott. For. 31: 113–125.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stoakley, J. T., 1979, The pine beauty moth—Its distribution, life cycle and importance as a pest in Scottish forests, in: Control of Pine Beauty Moth by Fenitrothion in Scotland (A. V. Holden and D. Bevan, eds.), pp. 7–17, Forestry Commission Occasional Paper #4, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Watt, A. D., 1985, The influence of host plant species and soil type on the population ecology of the pine beauty moth, Annu. Rep. Inst. Terr. Ecol. 1984: 28–30.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Watt, A. D., 1986, The ecology of the pine beauty moth in commercial woods in Scotland, in: Trees and Wildlife in the Scottish Uplands ( D. Jenkins, ed.), pp. 79–87, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Watt, A. D., 1986, The performance of the pine beauty moth on water-stressed lodgepole pine plants: A laboratory experiment, Oecologia (Berl.) 70: 578–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Watt, A. D., 1987, The effect of shoot growth stage of Pinus contorta and Pinus sylvestris on the growth and survival of Panolis flammea larvae. Oecologia (Berl.) 72: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Watt, A. D., 1987, Pine beauty moth outbreaks: The influence of host species, plant phenology, soil type, water stress and natural enemies, in: Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth (S. R. Leather, J. T. Stoakley, and H. F. Evans, eds.), pp. 21–26, Forestry Commission Bulletin 67. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Watt, A. D., and Leather, S. R., 1987, Pine beauty moth population dynamics synthesis, simulation and prediction, in: Population Biology and Control of the Pine Beauty Moth (S. R. Leather, J. T. Stoakley, and H. F. Evans, eds.), pp. 41–45, Forestry Commission Bulletin 67, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wellenstein, G., 1957, Die Beeinflussung der forstlichen Arthropodenfauna durch Waldameisen (Formica rufa Gruppe). I. Teil, Z. Angew. Entomol. 41: 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wellenstein, G., 1980, Auswirkung hugelbauender Waldameisen der Formica rufa Gruppe auf forstschadliche Raupen und das Wachstum der Waldbaume, Z. Angew. Entomol. 89: 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    White, T. C. R., 1969, An index to measure weather-induced stress of trees associated with outbreaks of psyllids in Australia, Ecology 50: 905–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    White, T. C. R., 1974, A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to populations of Selidosema suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand, Oecologia (Berl.) 16: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    White, T. C. R., 1976, Weather, food and plagues of locusts, Oecologia (Berl.) 22: 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    White, T. C. R., 1984, The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants, Oecologia (Berl.) 63: 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zwolfer, W., 1931, Studien zur okologie und epidemiologie der insekten: Die kieferneule, Panolis flammea Schiff, Z. Angew. Entomol. 17: 475–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan D. Watt
    • 1
  • Simon R. Leather
    • 2
  1. 1.Natural Environment Research Council, Institute of Terrestrial EcologyEdinburgh Research StationPenicuik, MidlothianScotland
  2. 2.Forestry CommissionNorthern Research StationRoslin, MidlothianScotland

Personalised recommendations