Conceptual Issues in Research with Survivors and Illustrations from a Follow-Up Study
The purpose of the present chapter is twofold. First, we would like to set out some general issues in doing research with survivors of extreme stress events. Initially, we will touch on the subjective narrative as a source of empirical data. We will then propose that there are two different genres of questions that are being asked in trauma research at the present time. The nature of these will be delineated along with more specific subquestions. Next, a set of methodologic considerations that may reduce the generalizability of findings from any particular sample of survivors will be briefly discussed.
KeywordsTraumatic Event Conceptual Issue Extreme Stress Vietnam Veteran Life Threat
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Gleser, G. C., Green, B. L., & Winget, C. N. (1981). Prolonged psychosocial effects of disaster: A study of Buffalo Creek. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Grace, M. C. (1986). Selective attrition in longitudinal research with disaster survivors: A methodological question. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Green, B. L. (1985). Conceptual and methodological issues in assessing the psychological impact of disaster. In B. J. Sowder (Ed.), Disasters and mental health: Selected contemporary perspectives (pp. 179–195). Washington, DC: NIMH, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 85-1421.Google Scholar
- Green, B. L., & Gleser, G. C. (1983). Stress and long-term psychopathology in survivors of the Buffalo Creek disaster. In D. Ricks & B. S. Dohrenwend (Eds.), Origins of psychopathology: Problems in research and public policy (pp. 73–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Green, B. L., Wilson, J. P., & Lindy, J. D. (1985). Conceptualizing post-traumatic stress disorder: A psychosocial framework. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake: The study and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (pp. 53–69). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Lindy, J. D. (1985). The trauma membrane and other clinical concepts derived from psychotherapeutic work with survivors of natural disasters. Psychiatric Annals, 15, 3, 153–160.Google Scholar
- Lindy, J. D., & Grace, M. C. (1985). The recovery environment: Continuing Stressor versus the healing psychosocial space. In B. J. Sowder (Ed.), Disasters and mental health: Selected contemporary perspectives (pp. 137–149). Washington, DC: NIMH, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 85-1421.Google Scholar
- Norris, F. H. (in press). Flood exposure and anxiety in older adults: A prospective study. Victimology: An International Journal.Google Scholar
- Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1986). Structured clinical interview for DSM-III: Non-patient version. New York: Biometrics Research.Google Scholar
- Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Mesnikoff, A. M., & Cohen, M. S. (1968). The Psychiatric Evaluation Form. New York: Biometrics Research.Google Scholar