Skip to main content

Homogeneous Reactions

  • Chapter
Thermodynamics
  • 912 Accesses

Abstract

We consider a one-phase system (so that the assumptions of invertibility discussed in the preceding chapter are justified) in which a single chemical reaction is taking place, say, e.g.,

$$\mathrm{CO+\frac{1}{2}O_{2}}\;=\;\mathrm{CO_{2}}$$
((3.1.1))

Equation (3.1.1) does not, of course, imply addition in the ordinary algebraic sense of the quantities CO and O2. The meaning of equation (3.1.1) is to recall the experimentally observed fact that, when a given number of moles of CO is consumed by the reaction, the same number of moles of CO2 is produced, and half as many moles of O2 are consumed. Let the components appearing in the reaction be numbered consecutively, say CO is B 1, O2 is B 2, and CO2 is B 3, and let σ j be the corresponding stoichiometric coefficients, say σ1 = −1, σ2 = −1/2, and σ3 = 1. We note that the stoichiometric coefficients of the species appearing on the left-hand side (the “reactants”) are assigned negative stoichiometric coefficients. Equation (3.1.1) can now be written as follows:

$$\underset{j}\sum\sigma_{j}B_{j}\;=\;0$$
((3.1.2))

It is very easy but perhaps impudent for me, an academic, an engineer on paper, to criticize those who have successfully created a large-scale commercial reactor, but I ask you to ponder on this point. This is a simple reaction between two molecules at 360 °C. Surely the chemical rate is not terribly small, and at 15 cm/sec in a 10 m deep bed the reactants are in contact for more than a minute. Surely you would be surprised if the reaction was not nearly complete in such a deep bed.

P. N. Rowe

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • The method of determining the rank of the stoichiometric matrix presents some subtlety when different isomers may be present in the reacting mixture; see J. C. Whitwell and R. S. Dartt, AIChE J. 19, 1114 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proof that the reaction subspace and the composition space coincide only in the case of isomerization and polymerization reactions is given by G. Astarita, Chem. Eng. Sci. 31, 1224 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Direct coupling between different chemical reactions is generally excluded as a possibility in the chemical literature; the point is discussed by M. J. Boudart, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 2286 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The implications of the strong constraint, that every individual chemical reaction proceeds with a nonnegative dissipation rate on possible reaction pathways, are discussed by R. Shinnar and C. A. Feng, Ind. Eng. Chem., Fundam. 24, 153 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • There is ample literature on the mathematics of stoichiometry and mass action kinetics; two important references are E. H. Kerner, Bull. Math. Biophys. 34, 243 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Feinberg, Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal. 49, 187 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The general case of linear kinetics is formalized by J. Wei and C. D. Prater, Adv. Catal. 13, 203 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Point (e) of Problem 3.1 raises the possibility that there may be more than one equilibrium point in the reaction subspace. This is possible in nonideal mixtures; see H. G. Othmer, Chem. Eng. Sci. 31, 993 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The whole question of independence of chemical reactions, the influence of stoichiometry on the equilibrium behavior of reacting systems, and the stability of chemical equilibrium was discussed in detail long ago by E. Jouguet, J. Ecole Poly., II Ser. 21, 61, 181 (1921); a more recent formal discussion was given by.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Aris, Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal. 19, 81 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The general theory of homogeneous reacting mixtures, expressed in terms of internal state variables, has an ample literature. Some important references are M. E. Gurtin and A. S. Vargas, Arch. Rath Mech. Anal. 43, 179 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. D. Coleman and M. E. Gurtin, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 597 (1967); Phys. Fluids 10, 1454 (1967)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Truesdell, Rational Thermodynamics, 2nd ed., Chapter 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The best source for the concept of affinity is Th. De Donder and P. Van Rysselberghe, Thermodynamic Theory and Affinity, Stanford University Press (1936); the concept of affinity, however, predates this by quite some time. The word “affinity” was used as far back as 1888 by H. Le Chatelier, Les Equilibres Chimiques, Carré et Naud, Paris (1888), and it was attributed to earlier workers such as Berthelot, if in derogatory terms.

    Google Scholar 

  • The question of writing the stoichiometric equation for a reaction in the form of equation (3.1.2), with stoichiometric coefficients which can be both positive and negative, also has an old tradition; see, e.g., K. G. Denbigh, The Thermodynamics of the Steady State, Methuen, London (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • This leads to the question of what is meant by the so-called “principle of microscopic reversibility.” This is discussed in the Denbigh book cited above, as well as by J. Wei, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 1578 (1962) and by.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • G. Astarita, Quad. Ing. Chim. Ital. 14, 1 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The continuous description of mixtures was first developed by Th. De Donder, L’affinité—Seconde Partie, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1931). The presentation in Section 3.6, as well as most modern analyses of continuous mixtures, is based on the methodology discussed in the fundamental work of.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Aris and G. R. Gavalas, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 260, 351 (1966); however, the second-law implications are based on the methodology presented by Truesdell for the case of a finite number of reactions in the book cited above. The question of substituting pseudocomponents for a mixture, by finding the optimal quadrature points for the integrals appearing in a continuous description, is discussed by

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. K. Shibata, S. I. Sandier, and R. A. Behrens, Chem. Eng. Sci. 42, 197 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinetic analyses for continuous mixtures (mostly linear kinetics) have been reviewed by V. W. Weekman, Chem. Eng. Prog., Symp. Ser. No. 11, 75, 3 (1979) and by

    Google Scholar 

  • K. B. Bischoff and P. Coxson, Proc. 2nd ICREC Meeting, Pune (1987). Some preliminary analysis of the nonlinear case is discussed by G. Astarita and R. Ocone, AIChE J. 39, 1299 (1988) and by G. Astarita, AIChEJ. (to be published).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A good source for studying functional analysis is F. Riesz and B. Nagy, Functional Analysis, Ungar, New York (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liapounov functions are discussed in all textbooks on stability analysis; a good source is M. M. Denn. Stability of Reactions and Transport Processes, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Problem 3.3 is a variation of the classical predator-prey model of A. J. Lotka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42, 1595 (1920); Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 6, 410 (1920). In the Lotka formulation the kinetic equations are

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Astarita, G. (1989). Homogeneous Reactions. In: Thermodynamics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0771-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0771-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0773-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0771-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics