Advertisement

Evaluation of Collagen-Immobilized Percutaneous Implants

  • T. Okada
  • Y. Ikada

Abstract

A SilasticR tube, provided with a silicone disk or also a polyethylene sponge covering the disk as a cuff, was fabricated in an attempt to develop a percutaneous device which would not suffer from infection. Following exposure to corona discharge, acrylic acid was graft polymerized onto the surface of the cuff. Then collagen was immobilized covalently on the grafted surface by utilizing the carboxyl groups of the poly(acrylic acid) chains. The collagen immobilization was performed to render the cuff surface tissue-adhesive for preventing the bacterial infection which would occur through the dead space present between the cuff and the epidermal tissue. The device was percutaneously implanted in the back of rabbits to examine epidermal down-growth as well as bacterial infection. Unless the collagen was immobilized, bacterial infection occurred in an early stage after implantation. On the contrary, no epidermal down-growth was observed and infection took place only in one case when the cuff surface was immobilized with collagen. This result indicates that the collagen immobilization is very effective in preventing bacterial infection of the percutaneous device.

Keywords

Bacterial Infection Acrylic Acid Adhesion Force Dead Space Corona Discharge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. D. T. Daly, K. A. Dasse, K. E. Gould, T. J. Smith, G. G. Bousquet, V. L. Poirier & R. J. Cleveland, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs., XXX111, 664–671 (1987). “A New Percutaneous Access Device for Peritoneal Dialysis.”.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Mooney, D. B. Hartman, D. McNeal, D. Calif, J. Benson & I. Calif, Arch. Surg., 108, 148–153, (1974). “The Use of Pure Carbon for Permanent Percutaneous Electrical Connector Systems.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. D. Daly, M. Szycher, V. L. Poirier, W. J. Robinson, C. C. Haudenschild & R. J. Cleveland, 88 (1), 148–155 (1980). “A Method of Establishing Permanent Percutaneous Energy Transmission.”.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. G. Siestrup & K. Affeld, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 18, 354–382 (1984). “Design Criteria for Percutaneous Devices.”.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. V. Hall, P. A. Cox & S. R. McFarland, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 18, 383–393 (1984). “Some Factors That Influence Prolonged Interfacial Continuity.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. F. von Recum, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 18, 323–336 (1984). “Application and Failure Modes of Percutaneous Devices: A View.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Myojin & A. F. von Recum, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 12, 557–570 (1978). “Experimental Infections along Subcutaneous Conduits.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. A. Dasse, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 18, 403–411 (1984). “Infection of Percutaneous Devices: Prevention, Monitoring, and Treatment.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Okada, Y. Tamada & Y. Ikada in: “Biomaterials and Clinical Applications,” A. Pizzoferrato, Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 465–470. “Surface Modification of Silicone for Tissue Adhesive.”.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Mcrath, Anal. Biochem., 49, 95–102 (1972). “Protein Measurement by Ninhydrin Determination of Amino Acids Released by Alkaline Hydrolysis.”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Okada
    • 1
  • Y. Ikada
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for Medical Polymers and BiomaterialsKyoto UniversitySakyo-ku, Kyoto 606Japan

Personalised recommendations