The Emergence of Two-Dimensional Science in the Information Society

  • George J. Klir
Chapter
Part of the International Federation for Systems Research International Series on Systems Science and Engineering book series (IFSR, volume 7)

Abstract

It has increasingly been recognized that a number of countries, primarily the United States and other countries in the West, are at some unique historical crossroad of great significance. This crossroad is usually described as a transition from an industrial into postindustrial phase of society. It is compared in its significance with the previous major societal transition—the change from the pre-industrial into industrial society. Although the transition into the industrial society occurred in most Western countries in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, most of the world today is still characterized by the pre-industrial society.

Keywords

System Science Industrial Society Information Society System Problem Source System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics, John Wiley, New York (1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. R. Ashby, Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1 (1958), 83–99.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. R. Ashby, Some consequences of Bremermann’s limit for information-processing systems. In H. Oestreicher and D. Moore (eds.), Cybernetic Problems in Bionics, pp. 69–76. Gordon Breach, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Aulin, The Cybernetic Laws of Social Progress. Pergamon Press, New York (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Y. Aulin Ahmavaara, The law of requisite hierarchy. Kybernetes 8 (1979), 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. J. Bremermann, Optimization through evolution and recombination. In M. C. Yovits et al. (eds.), Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 93–106. Spartan Books, Washington, D.C. (1962).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Christensen, Entropy Minimax Sourcebook, Vol. I: General Description. Entropy, Lincoln, Mass. (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. E. Cavallo and G. J. Klir, Reconstructability analysis: overview and bibliography. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 7 (1981), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. E. Cavallo and G. J. Klir, Reconstructability analysis of multi-dimensional relations: a theoretical basis for computer-aided determination of acceptable systems models. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 5 (1979), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. E. Cavallo and G. J. Klir, Reconstructability analysis: evaluation of reconstruction hypotheses. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 7 (1981), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. E. Cavallo and G. J. Klir, Reconstruction of possibilistic behavior systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 8 (1982), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. C. Conant, Laws of information which govern systems. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernet. SMC-6 (1976), 240–255.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. R. Fuchs, The Service Economy. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. R. Gaines, System identification, approximation and complexity. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 3 (1977), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. C. Gallopin, The abstract concept of environment. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 7, 139–149.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. R. Gardner and W. R. Ashby, Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature 228 (1970), 784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of N P-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1979).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. E. Gelfand and C. C. Walker, The distribution of cycle lengths in a class of abstract systems. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 4 (1977), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Gershuny, After Industrial Society? Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey (1978).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Hai, An empirical investigation of reconstructability analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Thomas J. Watson School of Engineering, Applied Science and Technology, SUNY-Binghamton (1984).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Higashi, G. J. Klir and M. A. Pittarelli, Reconstruction families of possibilistic structure systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 12 (1984), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. T. Jaynes, Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In R. L. Levine and M. Tribus (eds.), The Maximum Entropy Formalism, pp. 15–118. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1979).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. J. Klir, An Approach to General Systems Theory. Van Nostrand, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. J. Klir, Architecture of Systems Problem Solving. Plenum Press, New York (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. J. Klir and A. Hai, The computer as a metamethodological tool: a case of reconstructability analysis. Proc. Int. SGSR Conf., New York, pp. 237–242 (1984).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Lewis, The New Service Society. Longman, London (1973).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Makridakis and C. Faucheux, Stability properties of general systems. Gen. Syst. Yearbook 18 (1973), 3–12.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. D. Mesarovic and Y. Takahara, General Systems Theory: Mathematical Foundations. Academic Press, New York (1975).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Naisbitt, Megatrends. Warner Books, New York (1982).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. Padulo and M. A. Arbib, Systems Theory. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia (1974).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Polya, An empirical investigation of the relations between structure and behavior for nonlinear second-order systems. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Advanced Technology, SUNY-Binghamton (1981).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. Porter, Requisite variety in the systems and control sciences. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2 (1976), 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. E. Shore and R. W. Johnson, Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-26 (1980), 26–37.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y. Takahara and B. Nakao, A characterization of interactions. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 7 (1981), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. C. Walker, Behavior of a class of complex systems: the effect of system size on properties of terminal cycles. J. Cybernet. 1 (1971), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    T. G. Windeknecht, General Dynamical Processes: A Mathematical Introduction. Academic Press, New York (1971).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. P. Zeigler, A conceptual basis for modelling and simulation. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 1 (1974), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    B. P. Zeigler, The hierarchy of system specifications and the problem of structural inference. In P. Suppe and P. P. Asquith (eds.), PSA 1976, pp. 227–239. Philosophy of Science Ass., East Lansing, Michigan (1976).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    B. P. Zeigler, Multifacetted Modelling and Discrete Event Simulation. Academic Press, London (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • George J. Klir

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations