Advertisement

Using a Model of Cognitive Function to Plan Cognitive Treatment

An Axial Model of Brain Function
  • Robert L. Pusakulich
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

The practice of neuropsychological assessment routinely calls for the selection of a series or “battery” of psychometric measures of cortical functions. Rehabilitative interventions for cognitive retraining also require assessment and description of debilitated and normal cortical functions. The selection of tests for an assessment battery or any other clinical test aggregate requires either an explicit or implicit model or scheme based upon the kinds or types of cortical functions expected to be assessed and described. However, such models are not plentiful and it is easy for practitioners in such circumstances to fall back upon functional descriptions generated by the “face validities” of the tests themselves or some “folk psychological” list of cortical functions (see Smith Churchland, 1986, for a discussion of “folk psychological” constructs).

Keywords

Brain Function Cortical Function Clinical Neuropsychologist Axial Model Left Parietal Lobe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, N.J., & Squire, L.R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing what. Science, 210, 207–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Freund, H.S. (1987). Abnormalities of motor behavior after cortical lesions in humans. In V.B. Mountcastle, F Plum, & S.R. Geiger (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. 5. Higher functions of the brain (Pt. 2, pp. 768–810). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
  4. Goldberg, E. (1989). Gradiental approach to neocortical functional organization. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrington, A. (1985). Nineteenth century ideas in hemisphere differences and “duality of mind.” Behavioral & Brain Sciences,8, 617–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. LeDoux, J.E. (1987). Emotion. In V.B. Mountcastle, F Plum, & S.R. Geiger (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. 5. Higher functions of the brain (Pt. 2, pp. 768–810). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
  7. Long, J.L. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to lisrel. In J.L. Sullivan & R.G. Niemi (Series Eds.), Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative applications in social sciences (No. 33, pp. 11–17). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Luria, A.R. (1973). The working brain (B. Haigh, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. McGuinness, D., & Pribram, K. (1980). The neuropsychology of attention: Emotional and motivational controls. In M.C. Wittrock Ed., Brain and psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marin, O.S.M., Schwartz, M.F, & Saffan, E.M. (1979). Origins and distribution of language. In F.A. King (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurology: Neuropsychology (M.S. Gazzaniga, Ed., Vol. 2, pp.179–208). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and structure of behavior (pp. 81–93). New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishkin, M. (1982). A memory system in the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 298, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nauta, W.J.H., & Feirtag, M. (1979). The organization of the brain. In The brain: A Scientific American book. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  14. Pribram, K.H. (1981). Emotions. In S.B. Filskov & T.J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (Vol. 1, pp. 102–134). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Semmes, J. (1968). Hemispheric specialization: A possible clue to mechanism. Neuropsychologia, 6, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith Churchland, P. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Tucker, D.M., & Williamson, P.A. (1984). Asymmetric neural control systems in humans: Self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Pusakulich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyVA Medical CenterMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations