Advertisement

Sex and Gender

  • Janet R. Matthews
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

The terms sex and gender are difficult to separate in much of the literature. Unger (1979) suggested that the term sex had been used to cover too wide a range of conditions. She recommended use of the term gender for “those nonphysiological components of sex that are culturally regarded as appropriate to males or to females” (Unger, 1979, p. 1086). She also noted that it is important for researchers to be careful when stating that observed “sex” differences lead to “gender” differences without examining differences in the environment and socialization processes of the subjects. As environmental and socialization differences are seldom cited in the research articles used in this chapter, only the term sex will tend to be used.

Keywords

Spatial Ability Unilateral Lesion Neuropsychological Test Performance Symbol Digit Modality Tactual Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, N. S. (1987). Cognition, learning, and memory. In M. A. Baker (Ed.), Sex differences in human performance (pp. 37–54). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew, J. (1977). Delinquents and the Tapping Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 786–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, M. A. (1987). Sensory functioning, In M. A. Baker (Ed.), Sex differences in human performance (pp. 5–36). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Should we stop studying sex differences altogether? American Psychologist, 43, 1092–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blechman, E. A., & Brownell, K. D. (1988). Handbook of behavioral medicine for women. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, F. E., & Lazerson, A. (1988). Brain, mind, and behavior (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Boklage, C. E. (1977). Schizophrenia, brain asymmetry development, and twinning: Cellular relationship with etiological and possible prognostic implications. Biological Psychiatry, 12, 19–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bornstein, R. A. (1984). Unilateral lesion and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised: No sex differences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 604–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, R. A., & Matarazzo, J. D. (1984). Relationship of sex and the effects of unilateral lesions of the Wechsler intelligence scales. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 172, 707–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandon, A. D., Chavez, E. L., & Bennett, T. L. (1986). A comparative evaluation of two neuropsychological finger tapping instruments: Halstead-Reitan and Western Psychological Services. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 64–65.Google Scholar
  11. Bryden, M. P. (1981). Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buckelew, S. P., & Hannay, H. J. (1986). Relationships among anxiety, defensiveness, sex, task difficulty, and performance on various neuropsychological tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 711–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chavez, E. L., Schwartz, M. M., & Brandon, A. (1982). Effects of sex of subject and method of block presentation on the Tactual Performance Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 600–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chavez, E. L., Trautt, G. M., Brandon, A., & Steyaert, J. (1983). Effects of test anxiety and sex of subject on neuropsychological test performance: Finger Tapping, Trail Making, Digit Span and Digit Symbol tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 923–929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connor, A., Franzen, M. D, & Sharp, B. (1988). Effects of practice and differential instructions on Stroop performance. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 1–4.Google Scholar
  16. Dean, R. S. (1985). Foundation and rationale for neuropsychological bases of individual differences. In L. C. Hartlage & C. F. Telzrow (Eds.), The neuropsychology of individual differences: A developmental perspective. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. deLacoste, M. C., Holloway, R. L., & Woodward, D. J. (1986). Sex differences in the fetal human corpus callosum. Human Neurobiology, 5, 93–96.Google Scholar
  18. deLacoste-Utamsing, C., & Holloway, R. L. (1982). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science, 216, 1431–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeLisi, L. E., Dauphinais, D., & Hauser, P. (1989). Gender differences in the brain: Are they relevant to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 30, 197–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dementer, S., Ringo, J., & Doty, R. W. (1985). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum? Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 11, No. 254.12.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, M., Diamond, A. L., & Mast, M. (1972). Visual sensitivity and sexual arousal levels during the menstrual cycle. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 155, 170–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erlandson, G. L. (1987). Gender differences, diagnostic validity and the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 83A.Google Scholar
  23. Fleet, W. S., & Heilman, K. M. (1985). Acquired stuttering from a right hemisphere lesion in a righthander. Neurology, 35, 1343–1346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franzen, M. D. (1989). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Frazier, M. E, Silverstein, M. L., & Fogg, L. (1989). Lateralized cerebral dysfunction in schizophrenia and depression: Gender and medication effects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 33–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golden, C. J. (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test: A manual for clinical use. Chicago: Stoelting.Google Scholar
  28. Golden, C. J., & Vincente, P. J. (1983). Foundations of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldstein, G., & Tarter, R. E. (1986). Advances in clinical neuropsychology (Vol. 3). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gordon, N. G., & O’Dell, J. W. (1983). Sex differences in neuropsychological performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon, N. G., O’Dell, J. W, & Bozeman, N. (1981). Variation in neuropsychological performance as a function of sex. Journal of Psychology, 109, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gur, R. E. (1977). Motoric laterality imbalance in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, L. J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, M. D. (1982). The effects of depression, test artifacts, and sex on neuropsychological tests (Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 2986B.Google Scholar
  35. Herring, S. L. (1984). Neuropsychological performances of male and female subjects with unilateral cerebral lesions (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts, 44, 3236B.Google Scholar
  36. Herring, S., & Reitan, R. R. (1986). Sex similarities in verbal and performance IQ deficits following unilateral cerebral lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 537–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hesselbrock, M. E., Weidenman, M. A., & Reed, H. B. (1985). Effects of age, sex, drinking history, and antisocial personality on neuropsychology of alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46, 313–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hier, D, & Crowley, W. (1982). Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. New England Journal of Medicine, May 20.Google Scholar
  39. Hilgert, L. D, & Treloar, J. H. (1985). The relationship of the Hooper Visual Organization Test to sex, age, and intelligence of elementary school children. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 17, 203–206.Google Scholar
  40. Holloway, R. L., & deLacoste, M. C. (1986). Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum: An extension and replication study. Human Neurobiology, 5, 87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoyenga, K. B., & Hoyenga, K. T. (1979). The question of sex differences: Psychosocial cultural and biological issues. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  42. Incagnoli, T., Goldstein, G., & Golden, C. J. (1986). Clinical applications of neuropsychological test batteries. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Inglis, J., & Lawson, J. S. (1981). Sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence. Science, 212, 693–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Inglis, J., Ruckman, M., Lawson, J. S., MacLean, A. W., & Monga, T. N. (1982). Sex differences in the cognitive effects of unilateral brain damage. Cortex, 18, 257–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Inglis, J., Ruckman, M., Lawson, J. S., MacLean, A. W., & Monga, T. N. (1983). Sex differences in the cognitive effects of unilateral brain damage: Comparison of stroke and normal control subjects. Cortex, 19, 551–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobson, R. (1986). The contributions of sex and drinking history to the CT brain scan changes in alcoholics. Psychological Medicine, 16, 547–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klooz, N. A., & Rosenbaum, G. (1988, August). Lateralization of function in aging men and women. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  48. Knuckle, E. P., & Asbury, C. A. (1986). WISC-R discrepancy score directions and gender as reflected in neuropsychological test performance of black adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 44–51.Google Scholar
  49. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  50. Kupke, T. (1983). Effects of subject sex, examiner sex, and test apparatus on Halstead Category and Tactual Performance Tests. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 624–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kupke, T., Lewis, R., & Rennick, P. M. (1979). Sex differences in the neuropsychological functioning of epileptics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1128–1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lansdell, H. (1961). The effects of neurosurgery on a test of proverbs. American Psychologist, 16, 448.Google Scholar
  53. Lansdell, H. (1968). The use of factor scores from the Wechsler Bellevue Scale of Intelligence in assessing patients with temporal lobe removals. Cortex, 4, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Larue, L. J. (1986). Lateralized sex differences in human cognitive functioning (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 965A.Google Scholar
  55. Levy, J. (1984). A review, analysis, and some new data on hand-posture distributions in left-handers. Brain and Cognition, 3, 105–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levy, J., & Reid, M. (1978). Variations in cerebral organization as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levy, J., & Wagner, N. (1984). Handwriting, posture, visuomotor integration, and lateralized reaction time parameters. Human Neurobiology, 3, 157–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewis, R. S., & Kamptner, N. L. (1987). Sex differences in spatial task performance of patients with and without unilateral lesions. Brain Cognition, 6, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McGlone, J. (1977). Sex differences in the cerebral organization of verbal functions in patients with unilateral brian lesions. Brain, 100, 775–793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McGlone, J. (1978). Sex differences in functional brain symmetry. Cortex, 14, 122–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGlone, J. (1980). Sex differences in human brain symmetry: A critical survey. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 215–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McGlone, J. (1986). The neuropsychology of sex differences in human brain organization. In G. Goldstein & R. E. Tarter (Eds.), Advances in clinical neuropsychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–30). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morrison, M. W., Gregory, R. J., & Paul, J. J. (1979). Reliability of the Finger Tapping Test and a note on sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 139–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Newman, P. W, Bunderson, K., & Brey, R. H. (1985). Brain stem electrical responses of stutterers and normals by sex, ears, and recovery. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parlee, M. B. (1983). Menstrual rhythms in sensory processes: A review of fluctuations in vision, olfaction, audition, taste, and touch. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 539–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parsons, O. A., & Prigatano, G. P. (1978). Methodological considerations in clinical neuropsychological research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 608–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peters M. (1988). Corpus callosum. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 313–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Piazza, D. M. (1980). The influence of sex and handedness in the hemispheric specialization of verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 18, 163–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Regard, M., Strauss, E., & Knapp, P. (1982). Children’s performance on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 839–844.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rothblum, E. D. (1988). More on reporting sex differences. American Psychologist, 43, 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rovet, J. (1983). Cognitive and neuropsychological test performance of persons with abnormalities of adolescent development: A test of Waber’s hypothesis. Child Development, 54, 941–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Seidenberg, M., Gamache, M. P., Beck, N. C., Smith, M., Giordani, B., Berent, S., Sackellares, J. C., & Boll, T. J. (1984). Subject variables and performance on the Halstead Neuropsychological Test Battery: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 658–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simon, J. R., Paullin, C., Overmyer, S. P., & Berbaum, K. (1985). Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented Stroop stimuli: Effects of handedness and sex. International Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 21–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Snow, W. G., & Sheese, S. (1985). Lateralized brain damage, intelligence, and memory: A failure to find sex differences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 940–941.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Snow, W. G. Freedman, L., & Ford, L. (1986). Lateralized brain damage, sex differences, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales: A reexamination. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 179–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sparadeo, F. R., Zwick, W. R., & Butters, N. (1983). Cognitive functioning of alcoholic females: An exploratory study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Spreen, Q, Tupper, D., Risser, A., Tuokko, H., & Edgell, D. (1984). Human developmental neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Springer, S. P., & Duetsch, G. (1985). Left brain, right brain (rev. ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  82. Sundet, K. (1986). Sex differences in cognitive impairment following unilateral brain damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wada, J., Clarke, R., & Hamm, A. (1975). Asymmetry of frontal speech zones in 100 adult and 100 infant brains. Archives of Neurology, 32, 239–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Warkentin, S., Rodriguez, G., & Rosadini, G. (1988). Gender differences in regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 332 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  86. Wedding, D., Horton, A. M., & Webster, J. (Eds.). (1986). The neuropsychology handbook: Behavioral and clinical perspectives. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Weinfeld, F. (1981). The Nation survey of stroke. Stroke, 12, 52–53.Google Scholar
  88. Witelson, S. F. (1976). Sex and the single hemisphere: Specialization of the right hemisphere in spatial processing. Science, 193, 425–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Witelson, S. F (1985). On hemisphere specialization and cerebral plasticity from birth: Mark II. In C. Best (Ed.), Hemispheric function and collaboration in the child (pp. 33–85). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  90. Witelson, S. F., & Kigar, D. L. (1988). Anatomical development of the corpus callosum in humans: A review with reference to sex and cognition. In D. L. Molfese & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Brain lateralization in children: Developmental implications (pp. 35–57). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  91. Witelson, S. E, & Palie, W. (1973). Left hemisphere specialization for language in the newborn: Neuroanatomical evidence of asymmetry. Brain, 96, 641–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woods, B. T., & Hebben, N. (1988). Neurological function and dysfunction. In E. A. Blechman & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral medicine for women (pp. 145–159). Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  93. Yeo, R. A. (1989). Individual differences. In E. D. Bigler, R. A. Yeo, & E. Turkheimer (Eds.), Neuropsychological function and brain imaging (pp. 295–316). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yeo, R. A., Turkheimer, E., & Bigler, E. (1984). The influence of sex and age on unilateral cerebral lesion sequelae. International Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yeudall, L. T., Fromm, D., Reddon, J. R., & Stefanyk, W. O. (1986). Normative data stratified by age and sex for 12 neuropsychological tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 918–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yeudall, L. T., Reddon, J. R., Gill, D. M., & Stefanyk, W. O. (1987). Normative data for the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological tests stratified by age and sex. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 346–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Younes, R. P., Rosner, B., & Webb, G. (1983). Neuroimmaturity of learning disabled children: A controlled study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 25, 574–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Young, F A., Beattie, R. J., Newby, F. J., & Swindal, M. T. (1954). The Pullman study—A visual survey of Pullman school children. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 31, 192–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet R. Matthews
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLoyola UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations