NDE of Adhesively Bonded Joints Using Acousto-Ultrasonics and Pattern Recognition

  • Y. Youssef
  • A. Fahr
  • C. Roy

Abstract

Adhesively bonded joints are increasingly being employed in structural as well as non-structural applications due to the advantages they offer in terms of design flexibility, stress distribution, strength-to-weight ratio and cost effectiveness. However, a major limitation in the structural use of adhesives, particularly in aerospace applications, is associated with the difficulty encountered in making an accurate measure of bond quality or potential performance after the joint has been assembled. Furthermore, the performance of bonded joints during service may be affected by environmental conditions or by service induced damage that would result in a requirement for verification of bond quality. There is consequently a need for nondestructive evaluation techniques that can provide assurance of the structural performance of bonded joints both after fabrication as well as during service life.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission Recognition Rate Stress Wave Failure Load Canonical Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guyott, C. C. H., Cawley, P. and Adams, R. D., The Nondestructive Testing of Adhesively Bonded Structures: A Review, J. Adhesion, 1986, Vol. 20, pp. 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, R. D., Cawley, P. and Guyott, C. C. H., Nondestructive Inspection of Adhesively Bonded Joints, J. Adhesion, 1987, Vol. 21, pp. 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fahr, A. and Tanary, S., Nondestructive Evaluation of Adhesively-Bonded Joints, Proc. 69th AGARD meeting, Brussels, 1-6 October 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vary, A., The Acousto-ultrasonic Approach, NASA TM89843, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fahr, A., Lee, S., Tanary, S. and Haddad, Y., Estimation of Strength in Adhesively Bonded Steel Specimens by Acousto-Ultrasonic Technique, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1989, pp. 233–240.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hand, D. J., Discrimination and Classification, Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    James, M., Classification Algorithms, Collins, London, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Afifi, A. A. and Clark, V., Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis, Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, California, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams, J. H. Jr. and Lee, S., Pattern Recognition Characterization of Mechanical and Morphological Materials States via Analytical Quantitative Ultrasonics. Materials Analysis by Ultrasonics, Edited by A. Vary, Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dickstein, P., Segal, Y., Segal, E. and Sinclair, A. N., Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques: A Sample Problem of Ultrasonic Determination of Interfacial Weakness in Adhesive Joints, J. NDE, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, 6th edition, Cary, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Youssef
    • 1
  • A. Fahr
    • 2
  • C. Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SherbrookeCanada
  2. 2.Structures and Materials LaboratoryInstitute for Aerospace Research, National Research CouncilOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations