Ultrasonic Characterization of Polymers under Simulated Processing Conditions

  • L. Piché


In contrast to usual materials, polymers are characterized by the non-equilibrium nature of their structure. Polymers are viscoelastic in that their mechanical properties depend not only on pressure (p), volume (V) and temperature (T), but also time (t). Viscoelasticity determines processability, while thermodynamic history during processing influences end-use properties. It is therefore important to perform mechanical measurements in conditions representative of those for manufacturing. This cannot be achieved with usual methods; ultrasonics, however, provides a unique means to realize such experiments. Using this approach, we describe an apparatus which measures sound velocity (v) and attenuation (a) and also incorporates simultaneous monitoring of the specific volume (V) to characterize the thermodynamic state of the material. The instrument allows close control of the thermodynamic history in the temperature range from T = −150 °C to T = 300°C and pressures up to p = 2.0 kbars. Results for the velocity, attenuation and specific volume are translated in terms of a dynamic complex modulus for the description of viscoelasticity. The experiment constitutes an essential step toward on-line measurements for process control in the plastics industry.


Specific Volume Injection Molding Short Time Behavior Time Response Function Measure Sound Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. D. Ferry, “Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers”, John Wiley, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. M. Ward, “Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers”, John Wiley, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Hartman, “Ultrasonic Measurements” in “Methods of Experimental Physics”, ed. R. A. Fava, Academic Press (1980), Vol. 16-c, Chap. 12.1, pp. 59-90.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Pethrick, “Acoustical Properties” in “Comprehensive Polymer Science”, eds. C. Booth and C. Price, Pergamon, Oxford (1988) Vol. 2, “Polymer Properties”, Chap. 17, pp. 571–599.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Piché, submitted to Polymer (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. B. McKenna, “Glass Formation and Glassy Behavior” in “Comprehensive Polymer Science” eds. C. Booth and C. Price, Pergamon, Oxford (1989) Vol. 2, “Polymer Properties”, Chap. 10, pp. 311–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. I. Rubin, “Injection Molding, Theory and Practice”, Wiley-lnterscience Series, New York (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Piché, F. Massines, A. Hamel, C. Néron, “Method and Apparatus for the Ultrasonic Characterization of Polymers Under Simulated Processing Conditions”, U. S. Pat. No. 4, 754,645, July 5, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. J. Plazek, M. J. Rosner and D. L. Plakek, J. Polym. Sci. B. Polymer. Phys., 26, 473 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Tribone, J. M. O’Reilly and J. J. Greener, J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys., 27, 837(1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Piché
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Council CanadaIndustrial Materials Research InstituteBouchervilleCanada

Personalised recommendations