The Neocortex pp 245-253 | Cite as

Transient Receptor Expression in Visual Cortex Development and the Mechanisms of Cortical Plasticity

  • M. Cynader
  • C. Shaw
  • F. van Huizen
  • G. Prusky
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 200)

Abstract

During the first few months of postnatal life, the kitten visual cortex exhibits a remarkable plasticity, enabling it to match its organization to the visual environment with which it is confronted. If the visual environment is abnormal, as occurs with early monocular cataract or refractive error, then binocular competition results, with the eye that sees less well permanently losing cortical territory to the non-deprived eye (Cynader and Chernenko, 1976; Wiesel and Hubel, 1963a; Wiesel and Hubel, 1965). This binocular competition occurs only during a well-defined critical period which begins about three weeks after birth, peaks sharply between four and six weeks of age, and then declines slowly until the animal is about six months of age (Cynader et al., 1980; Hubel and Wiesel, 1970). We have investigated the mechanisms underlying binocular competition and the critical period that underlies it. In a series of electrophysiol-ogical experiments that have been described in detail elsewhere, the following features of binocular competition are now well established: (a) Binocular competition involves changes at the level of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) (Wiesel and Hubel, 1963b), the terminals of LGN afferents in the cortex (Hubel et al., 1977) and in the responses of cortical cells (Wiesel and Hubel, 1963a), but the primary event in binocular competition appears to involve the responses of the postsynaptic cells in Layer IV. This has been established by investigations showing that binocular competition can be made to be completely orientation dependent (Cynader and Mitchell, 1977), a property of cortical cells and not their afferents (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962), and by experiments which involve selective excitation (Shaw and Cynader, 1984) or inhibition (Reiter and Stryker, 1988) of cortical cells. In these latter experiments it has been shown that disturbing the responsivity of cortical cells without affecting the asymmetric input from the LGN that occurs with monocular suture is sufficient to prevent the effects of monocular deprivation.

Keywords

Visual Cortex Muscarinic Receptor Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Neurotransmitter Receptor Binocular Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bear, M., and Singer, W. (1986) Modulation of visual cortex plasticity by acetylcholine and noradrenaline. Nature, 320: 172–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christ, G.J., Goldfarb, J., Melman, A., Osman, R., and Maayani, S. (1988) Synergism between activated membrane receptors that trigger the same effector mechanism. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 14:111.Google Scholar
  3. Cynader, M. (1983) Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats: effects of age and visual exposure. Dev. Brain Res., 8: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cynader, M., and Chernenko, G. (1976) Some factors influencing the development of ocular dominance in the cat striate cortex. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, FL. April.Google Scholar
  5. Cynader, M., and Mitchell, D.E. (1977) Monocular astigmatism effects on kitten visual cortex development. Nature, 270: 177–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cynader, M., and Mitchell, D.E. (1980) Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats. J. Neurophysiol., 43: 1026–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cynader, M., and Shaw, C. (1986) Mechanisms underlying binocular competition in cat visual cortex. In Kellar, E., and Zee, D. (eds.) Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems. Pergamon Press, 53-61.Google Scholar
  8. Cynader, M., Timney, B.N., and Mitchell, D.E. (1980) Period of susceptibility of kitten visual cortex to the effects of monocular deprivation extends beyond six months of age. Brain Res., 191: 515–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daw, N.W., Robertson, T.W., Rader, R.K., Vedeen, T.O., and Cosica, C.J. (1984) Substantial reduction of noradrenaline by lesions of adrenergic pathways does not prevent effects of monocular deprivation. J. Neurosci., 4: 1354–1360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. London, 160: 106–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. (1970) The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eyelid closure in kittens. J. Physiol. London, 206: 419–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N., and Levay, S. (1977) Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, 278: 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasamatsu, T., and Pettigrew, J.D. (1979) Preservation of binöcularity after monocular deprivation in the striate cortex of kittens treated with 6-hydroxydopamine. J. Comp. Neurol, 185: 139–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morrison, J.H., Magistretti, P.J., Benoit, R., and Bloom, F.E. (1984) The distribution andmor-phological characteristics of the intracortical VIP-positive cell: an immunohistochemical analysis. Brain Res., 292: 269–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prusky, G.T., and Cynader, M.S. (1988a) [3H]Nicotine binding sites are associated with mammalian optic nerve terminals. Visual Neurosci., 1: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prusky, G.T., and Cynader, M.S. (1988b) The distribution and ontogenesis of [3H]nicotine binding sites in cat visual cortex. Dev. Brain Res., 39: 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prusky, G., Shaw, C., and Cynader, M.S. (1987) Nicotine receptors are located on lateral gen-iculate nucleus terminals in cat visual cortex. Brain Res., 412: 131–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reiter, R.O., and Stryker, M.P. (1988) Neural plasticity without postsynaptic action potentials: less active inputs become dominant when kitten visual cortex cells are pharmacologically inhibited. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.SA., 85: 3623–3627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaw, C., and Cynader, M. (1984) Disruption of cortical activity prevents alterations of ocular dominance in monocularly deprived kittens. Nature, 308: 731–734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shaw, C., Prusky G., and Cynader, M. (1988) Surgical undercutting prevents receptor redistribution in developing kitten visual cortex. Visual Neurosci., 1: 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaw, C., Needier, M.C., and Cynader, M. (1984) Ontogenesis of muscarinic acetylcholine binding sites in cat visual cortex: reversal of specific laminar distribution during the critical period. Dev. Brain Res., 14: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaw, C., Prusky, G., van Huizen, F., and Cynader, M. (1987) Cellular localization of receptor populations in cat visual cortex using quinolinic acid lesions. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 13: 1046.Google Scholar
  23. Shaw, C., Wilkinson, M.W. Cynader, M., Needier, M.C., Aoki, C., and Hall, S.E. (1986) The laminar distributions and postnatal development of neurotransmitter and neuromodulator receptors in cat visual cortex. Brain Res. Bull., 16: 661–671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singer, W., and Rauschecker, J.P. (1982) Central core control of developmental plasticity in the kitten visual cortex, II. Electrical activation of mesencephalic and diencephalic projections. Exp. Brain Res., 47: 223–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Huizen, F., Strosberg, A.D., and Cynader, M. (1988) Cellular and subcellular localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors during postnatal development of cat visual cortex using immunocytochemical procedures. Dev. Brain Res., 44: 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiesel, T.N., and Hubel, D.H. (1963a) Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J. Neurophysiol., 26: 1003–1017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiesel, T.N., and Hubel, D.H. (1963b) Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat’s lateral geniculate body. J. Neurophysiol., 26: 978–993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiesel, T.N., and Hubel, D.H. (1965) Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J. Neurophysiol., 28: 1029–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Cynader
    • 1
  • C. Shaw
    • 1
  • F. van Huizen
    • 2
  • G. Prusky
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of British Columbia VancouverVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of NeuropharmacologyOrganon International bvThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations