Abstract
Reactivity as a concept (Strelau, 1983) is the psychological obverse of strength of the nervous system (Nebylitsyn, 1972a). Thus, highly reactive people, ones with a weak nervous system, are sensitive to weak stimulation, have a low optimum level of stimulation and arousal, are distractible and lack “functional endurance.” The last term means that they are less able than others to respond adaptively to increasingly intense, prolonged, or repetitive stimulation. Their reaction time, for example, should stop quickening and, in fact, slow down in response to increasingly loud auditory stimuli at a lower volume than is characteristic of low reactives. In technical language, high reactives have a lower “threshold of transmarginal inhibition” than other people (Keuss & Orlebeke, 1977; Nebylitsyn, 1972a). Low reactives, persons with strong nervous systems, of course, show the opposite characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antoni, M.H. Temporal relationship between life events and two illness measures: A cross-lag panel analysis. Journal of Human Stress, 1985, 11, 21–26.
Auerbach, A. Trait-state anxiety and adjustment to surgery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 264–271.
Auerbach, S.M., Kendall, P.C., Cutter, H.F., & Levitt, N.R. Anxiety, locus of control, type of preparatory information and adjustment to dental surgery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 809–818.
Auerbach, S.M., Martelli, M.F., & Mercuri, L.G. Anxiety, information, interpersonal impact and adjustment to a stressful health-care situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 1284–1296.
Barnes, G.E. Extraversion and pain. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 14, 303–308.
Barnes, G.E. The Vando R-A Scale as a measure of stimulus reducing-augmenting. In J. Strelau, F.H. Farley, & A. Gale (Eds.). The biological bases of personality and behaviour: Theories, measurement techniques, and development. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1985.
Burks, N., & Martin, B. Everyday problems and life-change events: Ongoing versus acute sources of stress. Journal of Human Stress, 1983, 11, 27–35.
Cohen, S., Kamarack, T., & Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983, 24, 385–396.
Davis, C.A., Cowles, M.P., & Kohn, P.M. Behavioural and physiological aspects of the augmenting-reducing dimension. Personality and Individual Differences, 1984, 5, 683–691.
De Longis, A., Coyne, J.C., Dakof, G., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts and major life events to health status. Health Psychology, 1982, 1, 119–136.
Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H., & Covi, L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 1974, 19, 1–15.
Dohrenwend, B.P., & Shrout, P.E. “Hassles” in the conceptualization and measurement of life-stress variables. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 780–785.
Dohrenwend, B.S., Dohrenwend, B.P., Dodson, M., & Shrout, P.E. Symptoms, hassles, social supports and life events: Problem of confounded measures. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1984, 93, 222–230.
Dubreuil, D.L., & Kohn, P.M. Reactivity and response to pain. Personality and Individual Differences, 1986, 6, 907–909.
Eckenrode, J. Impact of chronic and acute Stressors on daily reports of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 907–918.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, M.W. Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum, 1985.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B. G. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1968.
Forgione, A., & Barber, T.X. A strain gauge pain stimulator. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 102–106.
Green, B.L. On the confounding of “hassles” stress and outcome. American Psychologist, 1986, 41, 714–715.
Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 11, 213–218.
Ippolitov, F.V. Interanalyzer differences in the sensitivity-strength parameter for vision, hearing and cutaneous modalities. In V.D. Nebylitsyn & J.A. Gray (Eds.). Biological bases of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Johnson, D.T. Effects of interview stress on measures of state and trait anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968, 73, 245–251.
Kanner, A.D., Coyne, J.C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R.S. Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1981, 4, 1–39.
Keuss, P.J.G., & Orlebeke, J.F. Transmarginal inhibition in a reaction time task as a function of extraversion and neuroticism. Acta Psychologica, 1977, 41, 139–150.
Kohn, P.M. Sensation seeking, augmenting-reducing, and strength of the nervous system. In J.T. Spence & C. Izard (Eds.). Motivation, emotion, and personality: Proceedings of the XXIII International Congress of Psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland-Elsevier, 1985.
Kohn, P.M. Issues in the measurement of arousability. In J. Strelau & H.J. Eysenck (Eds.). Personality dimensions and arousal. New York: Plenum, 1987.
Kohn, P.M., Cowles, M.P., & Dzinas, K. Arousability, need for approval, and situational context as factors in pain tolerance. Journal of Research in Personality, 1989, 23, 214–224.
Kohn, P.M., Cowles, M.P., & Lafreniere, K. Relationships between psychometric and experimental measures of arousability. Personality and Individual Differences, 1987, 8, 225–231.
Kohn, P.M., Hunt, R.W., Cowles, M.P., & Davis, C.A. Factor structure and content validity of the Vando Reducer-Augmenter Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 1986, 7, 57–64.
Kohn, P.M., Lafreniere, K., & Gurevich, M. The Inventory of College Students’ Recent Life Experiences: A decontaminated hassles scale for a special population. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1990, 13, 619–630.
Lambert, W.E., Libman, E., & Poser, E.G. The effect of increased salience of a membership group on pain tolerance. Journal of Personality, 1960, 28, 350–357.
Mahoney, J., Shumate, M., & Worthington, E.L. Jr. Is the Vando Scale a valid measure of perceptual reactance? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 57, 1035–1038.
Marlowe, D., & Crowne, D.P. Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1961, 25, 109–115.
Marziali, E.A., & Pilkonis, P.A. The measurement of subjective response to stressful life events. Journal of Human Stress, 1986, 12, 5–12.
McGrath, R.E., & Burkhart, B.R. Measuring life stress: A comparison of the predictive validity of different scoring systems for the Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983, 39, 573–581.
Monroe, S.M. Major and minor life events as predictors of psychological distress: Further issues and findings. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1983, 6, 189–205.
Murphy, G., & Murphy, L.B. Experimental social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1931.
Nebylitsyn, V.D. Fundamental properties of the human nervous system. New York: Plenum, 1972a.
Nebylitsyn, V.D. The problem of general and partial properties of the nervous system. In V.D. Nebylitsyn & J.A. Gray (Eds.). Biological bases of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972b.
Otto, M.W., & Dougher, M.J. Sex differences and personality factors in responsivity to pain. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1985, 61, 383–390.
Petrie, A. Individuality in pain and suffering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Reason, J.T. Individual differences in auditory reaction time and loudness estimation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 236, 1089–1090.
Sales, S.M., & Throop, W.F. Relationship between kinesthetic aftereffect and “strength of the nervous system.” Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 492–497.
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press, 1970.
Strelau, J. A diagnosis of temperament by nonexperimental techniques. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 1972a, 3, 97–105.
Strelau, J. The general and partial nervous-system types—data and theory. In V.D. Nebylitsyn & J.A. Gray (Eds.). Biological bases of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972b.
Strelau, J. Temperament—personality—activity. London: Academic Press, 1983.
Taylor, S. Health psychology. New York: Random House, 1986.
Vando, A. A personality dimension related to pain tolerance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970, 31, 2292B-2293B. (University Microfilms No. 70-18, 865)
Vando, A. The development of the R-A Scale: A paper-and-pencil measure of pain tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1974, 1, 28–29.
Weinberger, M., Hiner, S.L., & Tierney, W.M. In support of hassles as a measure of stress in predicting health outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1987, 10, 19–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kohn, P.M. (1991). Reactivity and Anxiety in the Laboratory and Beyond. In: Strelau, J., Angleitner, A. (eds) Explorations in Temperament. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0643-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0643-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0645-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0643-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive