Contemporary Instruments for Assessing Early Temperament by Questionnaire and in the Laboratory

  • H. H. Goldsmith
  • Mary Klevjord Rothbart
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Research in behavioral science often succeeds or fails depending on the quality of its assessment instruments. Recognizing this, many temperament researchers have proposed questionnaires, interview schedules, home observation coding systems, and laboratory methods for assessing early temperament. These assessment instruments have been reviewed and evaluated from several perspectives (e. g., Bornstein, Gaughran, & Homel, 1986; Crockenberg & Acredolo, 1983; Goldsmith & Rieser-Danner, 1990; Hubert, Wachs, Peters-Martin, & Gandour, 1982; Neale & Stevenson, 1989; Rothbart & Goldsmith, 1985; Seifer & Sameroff, 1986; Slabach, Morrow, & Wachs, this volume). In this chapter, we preview some new instruments and review recent data on an established questionnaire, all developed in our laboratories. These instruments include the Infant Behavior Questionnaire, the Toddler Behavior Assessment Questionnaire, and the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire, as well as a battery of laboratory temperament assessment techniques.

Keywords

Sample Item Large Rubber Social Desirability Scale Infant Temperament Home Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates, J.E., & Bayles, K. Objective and subjective components in mothers’ perceptions of their children from age 6 months to 3 years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1984, 30, 111–130.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, J.E., Freeland, C.A.B., & Lounsbury, M.L. Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development, 1979, 50, 794–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bomstein, M.H., Gaughran, J.M., & Homel, P. Infant temperament: Theory, tradition, critique, and new assessments. In C.E. Izard & P.B. Read (Eds.). Measuring emotions in infants and children. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, A.H., & Plomin, R. A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, A.H., & Plomin, R. Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Capaldi, D.M., & Rothbart, M.K. (March, 1990). Development of an adolescent temperament measure. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, W.B. A simplified method for measuring infant temperament. Journal of Pediatrics, 1970, 77, 188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carey, W.B., & McDevitt, S. Revision of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire. Pediatrics, 1978, 61, 735–739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crockenberg, S.B., & Acredolo, C. Infant temperament ratings: A function of infants, mothers, or both? Infant Behavior and Development, 1983, 6, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M.K. Arousal, affect and attention as components of temperament. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55, 953–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, S. Personality and temperament. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. Eaton, W.O., & Dureski, C.M. Parent and actometer measures of motor activity level in the young infant. Infant Behavior and Development, 1986, 9, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Escalona, S.K. The roots of individuality: Normal patterns of development in infancy. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. Fullard, W., McDevitt, S.C., & Carey, W.B. Assessing temperament in one-to-three-year-old children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1984, 9, 205–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldsmith, H.H. Preliminary manual for the Toddler Behavior Assessment Questionnaire. Oregon Center for the Study of Emotion technical report No 88-04, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 1988.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, H.H., Buss, A.H., Plomin, R., Rothbart, M.K., Thomas, A., Chess, S., Hinde, R.A., & McCall, R.R. Roundtable: What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Development, 1987, 58, 505–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldsmith, H.H., & Campos, J. J. The nature of determinants of infant temperament and its implications for attachement formation: A reconceptualization. Developmental Psychobiology Research Group Conference. Estes Park, CO, May 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, H.H., & Campos, J.J. Fundamental issues in the study of early temperament: The Denver Twin Temperament Study. In M.E. Lamb, A.L. Brown, & B. Rogoff (Eds.). Advances in developmental psychology. Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Goldsmith, H.H., & Campos, J.J. The structure of temperamental fear and pleasure in infants: A psychometric perspective. Child Development, 1990, 61, 1944–1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldsmith, H.H., Elliot, T.K., & Jaco, K.L. Construction and initial validation of a new temperament questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 1986, 9, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldsmith, H.H., & Rieser-Danner, L. Variation among temperament theories and validational studies of temperament assessment. In G.A. Kohnstamm (Ed.). Temperament discussed: Temperament and development in infancy and childhood. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. Goldsmith, H.H., & Rieser-Danner, L. Assessing early temperament. In C.R. Reynolds, & R. Kamphaus (Eds.). Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context. Vol. 2. New York: Guilford, 1990.Google Scholar
  23. Goldsmith, H.H., Rieser-Danner, L., & Briggs, S. Convergent and discriminant validity for infant, toddler, and preschooler temperament questionnaires. Developmental Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldsmith, H.H., Rothbart, M.K. The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (LAB-TAB): Locomotor Version. Oregon Center for the Study of Emotion, technical report No 88-01, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. Gordon, S. The socialization of children’s emotions: Toward a unified constructionist theory. In C. Saarni, & P.L. Harris (Eds.). Children’s understanding of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  26. Gunnar, M.R. Human developmental psychoneuroendocrinology: A review of research on neuroendocrine responses to challenge and threat in infancy and childhood. In M.E. Lamb, A.L. Brown, & B. Rogoff (Eds.). Advances in developmental psychology. Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.Google Scholar
  27. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 1979, 108, 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubert, N.C., & Wachs, T.D. Peters-Martin, P., Gandour, M.J. The study of early temperament: Measurement and conceptual issues. Child Development, 1982, 53, 571–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKeen, N., & Eaton, W.O. Infant motor activity: Temperament, behavior and sex differences. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Kansas City, MO, April 1989.Google Scholar
  30. Neale, M.C., & Stevenson, J. Rater bias in the EASI temperament scales: A twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56, 446–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nesselroade, J.R. Isssues in studying developmental change in adults from a multivariate perspective. In J.E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.). Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977.Google Scholar
  32. Rothbart, M.K. Laughter in young children. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothbart, M.K. Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Development, 1981, 52, 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothbart, M.K. Longitudinal observation of infant temperament. Developmental Psychology, 1986, 22, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rothbart, M.K. Temperament and the development of inhibited approach. Child Development, 1988, 59, 1241–1250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothbart, M.K. Behavioral approach and inhibition. In S. Reznick (Ed.). Perspectives on behavioral inhibition (pp. 139–157). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989a.Google Scholar
  37. Rothbart, M.K. Temperament and development. In G.A. Kohnstamm, J.A. Bates, & M.K. Rothbart (Eds.). Temperament in childhood (pp. 187–248). Chichester: Wiley, 1989b.Google Scholar
  38. Rothbart, M.K. The biological processes of temperament. In G.A. Kohnstamm, J.A. Bates, & M.K. Rothbart (Eds.). Temperament in childhood (pp. 77–110). Chichester: Wiley, 1989c.Google Scholar
  39. Rothbart, M.K. Temperament in childhood: A framework. In G.A. Kohnstamm, J.A. Bates, & M.K. Rothbart (Eds.). Temperament in childhood (pp. 59–75). Chichester: Wiley, 1989d.Google Scholar
  40. Rothbart, M.K. Convergences between laboratory and parent report measures of temperament. In C.Google Scholar
  41. Garcia Coll, Chair, “Behavioral assessments of infant temperament: Issues in validity and continuity.” Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, Missouri (1989e, April).Google Scholar
  42. Rothbart, M.K., & Derryberry, D. Development of individual differences in temperament. In M.E. Lamb & A.L. Brown (Eds.). Advances in developmental psychology. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  43. Rothbart, M.K., Derryberry, D., and Hershey, K. Stability of early temperament: Laboratory infant assessment to parent report at seven years. Manuscript in preparation, 1990.Google Scholar
  44. Rothbart, M.K., & Goldsmith, H.H. Three approaches to the study of infant temperament. Developmental Review, 1985, 5, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothbart, M.K., & Mauro, J.A. Questionnaire measures of infant temperament. In J.W. Fagen & J. Colombo (Eds.). Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability and prediction (pp. 411–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.Google Scholar
  46. Rothbart, M.K., & Posner, M.I. Temperament and the development of self-regulation. In L.C. Hartlage & C.F. Telzrow (Eds.). The neuropsychology of individual differences: A developmental perspective. New York: Plenum Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  47. Schaffer, H. Cognitive components of the infant’s response to strangeness. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.). The origins of fear. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  48. Seifer, R., & Sameroff, A.J. The concept, measurement, and interpretation of temperament in young children: A survey of research issues. In M.L. Wolraich, & D. Routh (Eds.). Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics. Vol. 7. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  49. Shirley, M. The first two years: Personality manifestations. Vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1933.Google Scholar
  50. Sroufe, L.A., & Wunsch, J. The development of laughter in the first year of life. Child Development, 1972, 43, 1326–1344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stenberg, C., & Campos, J.J. The development of anger expressions in infancy. In N.L. Stein, T. Trabasso, & B. Leventhal (Eds.). Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.Google Scholar
  52. Tellegen, A. Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 1982.Google Scholar
  53. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, A., Chess, S., & Birch, H. Temperament and behavior disorders in children. New York: New York University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  55. Thomas, A., Chess, S., Birch, H.G., Hertzig, M., & Korn, S. Behavioral individuality in early childhood. New York: New York University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, R.A., & Lamb, M.E. Stranger sociability and its relationships to temperament and social experience during the second year. Infant Behavior and Development, 1982, 5, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson, R.A., & Lamb, M.E. Continuity and change in socioemotional development during the second year. In R.N. Emde & R.J. Harmon (Eds.). Continuities and discontinuities in development. New York: Plenum, 1984.Google Scholar
  58. Worobey, J., & Blajda, V.M. Temperamental ratings at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 1 year: Differential stability of activity and emotionality. Developmental Psychology, 1989, 25, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Goldsmith
    • 1
  • Mary Klevjord Rothbart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations