Flexibility in RET

Forming Alliances and Making Compromises
  • Windy Dryden
Chapter
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

In this chapter, I discuss two concepts that I have found useful in my clinical practice of RET. The first concerns Bordin’s (1979) reformulation of the psychoanalytic concept of the therapeutic alliance, an idea I have found helpful in my struggles to develop a general framework for the conduct of RET. The second addresses the clinical reality that sometimes one is called on to make compromises with “elegant” RET while attempting to help clients achieve a “good enough” therapeutic outcome but not necessarily an “elegant” one. These two concepts have encouraged me to be flexible in my practice of RET—an important ingredient in making RET more effective.

Keywords

Therapeutic Alliance Irrational Belief Homework Assignment Psychoanalytic Concept Depressed Client 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anchin, J. C., & Kiesler, D. J. (Eds.). (1982). Handbook of interpersonal psychotherapy. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beutler, L. E. (1983). Eclectic psychotherapy: A systematic approach. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorn, F. J. (1984). Counseling as applied social psychology: An introduction to the social influence model. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  6. Dryden, W. (1984). Rational-emotive therapy. In W. Dryden (Ed.), Individual therapy in Britain (pp. 235-263). London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Dryden, W., & Hunt, P. (1985). Therapeutic alliances in marital therapy: 2. Process issues. In W. Dryden (Ed.), Marital therapy in Britain: Vol. 1. Context and therapeutic approaches (pp. 144-168). London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Ellis, A. (1979). Discomfort anxiety: A new cognitive behavioral construct, Part 1. Rational Living, 14(2), 3–8.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, A. (1980a). Discomfort anxiety: A new cognitive behavioral construct, Part 2. Rational Living, 15(1), 25–30.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, A. (1980b). The value of efficiency in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 17, 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, A. (1983). The philosophic implications and dangers of some popular behavior therapy techniques. In M. Rosenbaum, C. M. Franks, & Y. Jaffe (Eds.), Perspectives in behavior therapy in the eighties (pp. 138–151). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Kuipers, A. C. M., & Eggeraat, J. B. (1978). Cognitive modification versus prolonged exposure in vivo: A comparison with agoraphobics as subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 33–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golden, W. (1985). An integration of Ericksonian and cognitive-behavioral hypnotherapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders. In E. T. Dowd & J. M. Healy (Eds.), Case studies in hypnotherapy (pp. 12–22). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lazarus, A. A. (1981). The practice of multimodal therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Meichenbaum, D., & Gilmore, J. B. (1982). Resistance from a cognitive-behavioral perspective. In P. L. Wachtel (Ed.), Resistance (pp. 133–156). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pinsof, W. M., & Catherall, D. R. (1986). The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Safran, J. D. (1984). Assessing the cognitive-interpersonal cycle. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strong, S. R., & Claiborn, C. D. (1982). Change through interaction. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Windy Dryden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGoldsmiths’ College, University of LondonNew Cross, LondonEngland

Personalised recommendations