Personality, Social Skills, and Disturbed Behavior Patterns

An Introduction to the Issues
  • Brenda O. Gilbert
  • David G. Gilbert
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

The question of how psychopathology is related to social skills and to personality and temperament is important for a number of practical and theoretical reasons. Different clinical interventions make different assumptions concerning the causal relationships among personality, social skills, and psychopathology. Dissatisfaction among behaviorally oriented clinicians and researchers with personality-trait-based and nonempirically based (predominantly psychodynamic) conceptualizations of psychopathology and social behavior contributed to the rapid development and extensive use of social skills assessment and training (Phillips, 1985). During the last quarter of this century many social-skill-oriented writers (e.g., Gottman, 1979; Wine, 1981) and social systems theorists (e.g., Watzlawick, 1977; Watzlawick & Beavin, 1977) have criticized psychodynamic and other trait models that assume defects in development, biology, or personality cause psychopathology and interpersonal distress. Such criticism, in part, may be based on the misperception that for the social skills and learning orientations to be useful, productive, and valid, conceptualizations from trait and biological models of behavior must be useless, unproductive, and invalid.

Keywords

Social Skill Social Competence Social Skill Training Skill Deficit Perceptual Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellack, A. S., & Hersen, M. (1977). Behavior modification: An introductory textbook. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. A., & Brodie, H. K. H. (1986). American handbook of psychiatry, Volume 8: Biological psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Dohrenwend, B. R., & Dohrenwend, B. S. (1969). Social status and psychological inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior I.: On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  7. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural sciences approach. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. L’Abate, L., & Milan, M. A. (Eds.). (1985). Handbook of social skills training and research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Loehlin, J. C. (1987). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, M. (1985). Neuroticism as predisposition toward depression: A cognitive mechanism. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meichenbaum, D., Butler, L., & Gruson, L. (1981). Toward a conceptual model of social competence. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.), Social competence (pp. 36–60). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mischel, W. (1986). Introduction to personality (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Phillips, E. L. (1985). Social skills: History and prospect. In L. L’Abate & M. A. Milan (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training and research (pp. 3–21). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Pogue-Geile, M. F., & Rose, R. J. (1987). Psychopathology: A behavior genetic perspective. In T. Jacob (Ed.), Family interaction and psychopathology (pp. 629–650). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rothenberg, A. (1979). Einstein’s creative thinking and the general theory of relativity: A documented report. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 38–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schlundt, D. G., & McFall, R. M. (1985). New direction in the assessment of social competence and social skills. In L. L’Abate & M. A. Milan (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training and research (pp. 22–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Schwartz, G. E. (1982). Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 1040–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz, R., & Gottman, J. (1976). Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 910–920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tiggermann, M., Winefield, A., & Brebner, J. (1982). The role of extraversion in the development of learned helplessness. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vandenberg, S. G., Singer, S. M., & Pauls, D. L. (1986). The heredity of behavior disorders in adults and children. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watzlawick, P. (1977). Introduction. In P. Watzlawick, & J. H. Weakland (Eds.), The interactional view: Studies at the Mental Research Institute, Palo Alto1965–74 (pp. xi-xv). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Watzlawick, P., & Beavin, J. H. (1977). Some formal aspects of communication. In P. Watzlawick & F. Weakland (Eds.), The interactional view: Studies at the Mental Research Institute, Palo Alto1965–74 (pp. 56–70). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Wine, J. D. (1981). From defect to competence models. In J. D. Wine & M. D. Smye (Eds.), Social competence (pp. 3–35). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda O. Gilbert
    • 1
  • David G. Gilbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleIllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations