Abstract
One of the most useful aspects of self-report instruments may concern their ability to predict aspects of human behavior and experience. In a review of the clinical use of hypnosis, Wadden and Anderton (1982) indicated that many studies that use hypnosis frequently omit the assessment of hypnotic susceptibility. Reasons for omission usually include fear of poor response to test suggestions (which may then affect the client’s response to treatment), the belief that susceptibility is not important in treatment outcome, or the obtrusiveness of administration and time of administration, when using a scale like the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (Shor & Orne, 1962) or the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale (Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 1962). And yet without adequate assessment of that susceptibility, it becomes uncertain to what extent the hypnotic intervention enacted is causally related to the therapeutic results obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pekala, R.J. (1991). Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility with the PCI. In: Quantifying Consciousness. Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0629-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0629-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0631-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0629-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive