Advertisement

Abrasion Empirical Equations for the Itabirite Mud System

  • Aboulghasem Moonesan
  • Mohamed S. Bizanti

Abstract

Twenty-eight mud samples were tested in the laboratory to predict abrasion equations that will aid mud engineers for better treatment of itabirite mud systems. Three different ranges of particle size of itabirite were selected for the tests. Particle sizes between 74 and 125 microns, between 44 and 74 microns, and between 37 and 44 microns were used. Thirty-minute abrasion tests were conducted with a modified Hamilton Beach Blender at 9800, 11200, 12750, and 14350 RPM. Rheological properties, filtration properties, and abrasiveness were studied and analyzed. Regression analyses were performed between abrasion and the parameters of size, polymer concentration (Drispac Superlo or Kelzan XCD), and shear rate investigated in this research.

Keywords

Shear Rate Polymer Concentration Drill Fluid Coating Agent Filtration Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarkis, G. Ampian, “Barite,” Minerai Facts and Problems, Bureau of Mines, Bulletin 675, pp. 56-73, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bokle, F. M., “Techniques for Evaluation and Improving the performance of the Iron Oxides Used as Barite Substitutes in Oil Well Drilling Fluids,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binder, G. G. Jr., et al., “Evaluating Barite as a Source of Soluble Carbonate and sulfide Contamination in Drilling Fluids,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Dec, pp. 2371-2375, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scharf, A. D., and Watts, R. D., “Itabirite: an Alternative Weighting Material for Heavy Oil-Base Muds,” Paper SPE 13159, presented at the 1984 SPE Annual Technical Convention and Exhibition Houston, Sept., 1984.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golis, S. W., “Oil Mud Techniques Improve Performance in Deep,” presented at the 1984 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, Sept. 17-21,1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker, C. O., “Alternative Weighting MaterialJournal Pet. Tech. pp. 2158-2164, Dec, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demsimix Technical Data, 1313 First City National Bank Building, Houston, TX 77002, June, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Product Literature, “Drispac Superlo Additive”, Desco, Drilling Specialties Company, Technical Services Division, Bartlesville, OK 74004, 7 pp. 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelco Rotary Drilling Fluid Division, Kelco Oil Field Group, Inc. KR-1-A, Copyright Kelco Oil Field Group, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aboulghasem Moonesan
    • 1
  • Mohamed S. Bizanti
    • 1
  1. 1.Petroleum Engineering DepartmentLouisiana Tech UniversityRustonUSA

Personalised recommendations