Advertisement

From Peace to Rupture

Development and Crisis of Modern Solutions
  • Tom Dwyer
Part of the Plenum Studies in Work and Industry book series (SSWI)

Abstract

The “work of social peace,” as these institutions—both public and private—have been called, deal with prevention and compensation. Throughout the twentieth century they would increase the scope of their actions, their membership would rise, and their focus would become increasingly varied.

Keywords

International Labour Organisation External Demand Safety Engineering Union Movement Safety Engineer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    D. M. Berman. 1978. Death on the Job. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Albury and J. Schwartz. 1982. Partial Progress: The Politics of Science and Technology, pp. 9–24. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    These figures are drawn from Table 6–3, p. 232.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Based on the 1964, 1973, and 1984 editions of the Encyclopedia of Associations. Detroit: Gale Research.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. A. Ashford. 1976. Crisis in the Workplace, p. 506. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    In analyzing institutional size I am forced to use the membership data of professional organizations, which, apart from being extremely difficult to obtain for countries other than the United States, are of course subject to all sorts of distortions (e.g., the effects of recruitment campaigns). Both factors combined to discourage my early intention to build detailed analyses of comparative rates of institutional growth.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. W. Heinrich. 1959. Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach,4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. (First published in 1931.)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Poulot. 1980. Le Sublime. Paris: Maspero. (First published in 1870.)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Cottereau. 1980. Étude préalable, in Poulot, 1980, pp. 7–103.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Rose. 1978. Industrial Behaviour, p. 44. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. W. Taylor. 1947. Scientific Management, pp. x-xi (from the Foreword by H. S. Person). New York: Harper amp; Row.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rose, 1978, p. 60. See also R. Bendix. 1963. Work and Authority in Industry, p. 265. New York: Harper amp; Row.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. J. Nadworny. 1955. Scientific Management and the Unions 1900–1932, pp. 122–141. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Altman. 1976. Growing pains: A portrait of developing occupational safety and health in America. Job Safety and Health 4(8): 24–32 (p. 28 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. De Blois. n.d. (1931?) How the Safety Movement Began, p. 6. Unpublished manuscript held in the library of the National Safety Council, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    This development process was the opposite of that identified by Graebner in the United States coal mines; there, development was seen as a result of an employer-worker struggle. W. Graebner. 1976. Coal Mining Safety in the Progressive Period, p. 72. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. F. Noble. 1977. America by Design,p. 290. Oxford: Oxford University Press, quotes Magnus Alexander, a corporate reformer and former chairman of the safety committee at General Electric, who said at the First National Safety Council convention: “there is a great deal in the relation of employer and employees in improving the welfare of our employees that our employers ought to do and must do, and unless they wake up and go to work and do it soon voluntarily, with all the wonderful effect that it will have on such relationship, legislative action will force them.”Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noble, 1977, p. 289.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heinrich, 1959, pp. 415–416.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Blois, n.d., p. 6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. W. Mowery. 1917. Cause and prevention of industrial casualty. Industrial Management 53 (May): 177–189.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. W. Heinrich. 1950. Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach, p. 17. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heinrich, 1959, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Freidson. 1970. Profession of Medicine, p. 255. New York: Dodd Mead.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Enormous progress is made by resolving the safety-productivity conflict; when this is not possible increasing the importance of safety can be attempted, but the success will be less clearcut and more fragile,“ in J.-M. Faverge. 1967. Psychosociologie des Accidents du Travail,p. 30. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. E. Bird and G. L. Germain. 1966. Damage Control, p. 21. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bird and Germain, 1966, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bird and Germain, 1966, p. 101. “Careless Carl” and “Horseplay Harry” are two in a series of grotesquely stereotyped cartoon workers who destroy forklifts, products, and workmates.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Tye and K. Ullyet. 1971. Safety Uncensored, p. 153. London: Corgi, refer, to “much gossip and ill-informed comment in union circles” that followed a pro-damage control statement by Tye; the authors also anticipate opposition on the grounds of “anti-Americanism.”Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. T. Hardie. 1981. The safety professional of the future. Professional Safety 26 (5): 17–22.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Cooper-Richet. 1985. Les ingenieurs des mines vus d’en bas, in A. Thépot, 1985. L’Ingénieur dans la Societe Française, pp. 153–164. Paris: Editions Ouvrières.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. W. Malasky. 1974. System Safety, p. 7. New York: Hayden.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. J. Henley and H. Kumamoto. 1981. Reliability Engineering and Risk Assessment, pp. 13. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, introduce some of these notions.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    International Labour Office. 1989. The Organisation of First Aid in the Workplace. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. (Occupational Safety and Health Series No. 63.)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    V. Walters. 1982. Company doctor’s perceptions and responses to conflicting pressures from labor and management. Social Problems 30 (1): 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Selby quoted in Berman, 1978, p. 97.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Hirschman. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berman, 1978, p. 99.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Juffe. 1980. À Corps Perdu, pp. 58–69. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. T. Carter. 1985. Fifty years of medicine in the workplace. Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine Jubilee Issue, pp. 4–22. On p. 19 an “upstart group” is accused of activities “at worst economically threatening and at best a nuisance.”Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Bagnara, M. Biocca, and D. Mazzonis. 1981. Trends in occupational health and safety policy in Italy. International Journal of Health Services 11(3):431–450 (p. 438). I. Oddone. 1977. Ambiente di Lavoro, pp. 63–64. Rome: Editrice Sindacale Italiana. A. Milanaccio and L. Ricolfi. 1976. Lotte Operaie e Ambiente di Lavoro. Turin: Giulio Einaudi. Gulio Gino interviewed by G. Bonazzi; unpublished, October 1983.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    D. Walsh. 1987. Corporate Physicians, pp. 176–179. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. This study, which came to my notice shortly before going to press, focuses on concerns quite different from those in this chapter.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. R. Hale and M. Hale. 1972. A Review of the Industrial Accident Research Literature,p. 15. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Desmarez. 1986. La Sociologie Industrielle aux États Unis, chap. 3. Paris: Armand Colin. L. Baritz. 1965. The Servants of Power, chap. 6. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    H. M. Vernon. 1937. Accidents and Their Prevention, pp. 325–328. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berman, 1978, p. 23.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ashford, 1976, pp. 109ff.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    A. Mintz and M. Blum. 1949. A reexamination of the accident proneness concept. Journal of Applied Psychology 33 (3): 195–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    T. A. Ryan and P. C. Smith. 1954. Principles of Industrial Psychology, pp. 480–486. New York: Ronald Press, cited in Ashford, 1976, p. 110.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. Sass and G. Crook. 1981. Accident proneness: Science or non-science? International Journal of Health Services 11(2):175–190. E. C. Wigglesworth. 1978. The fault doctrine and injury control. The Journal of Trauma 18(12):789–794. F. P. McKenna. 1983. Accident proneness: A conceptual analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 15(1):65–71. J. B. Cronin. 1971. Cause and effect? Investigations into aspects of industrial accidents in the United Kingdom. International Labour Review 103(2):99–115. W. Crawford. 1973. Accident proneness-An unaffordable philosophy. Australian Safety News 44 (4): 11–15.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. H. Hirschfeld and R. C. Behan. 1963. The accident process: 1. Etiological considerations of industrial injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association 186(3):113–119. S. Arieti. 1966. American Handbook of Psychiatry, pp. 588–601. New York: Basic Books, cited in Berman, 1978, p. 23.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    D. Eva and R. Oswald. 1981. Health and Safety at Work, p. 65. London: Pan.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. M. Vernon. 1918. An Investigation of the Factors Concerned in the Causation of Industrial Accidents. Health and Munitions Committee Memo No. 21, London, His Majesty’s Stationery Office, cited in Hale and Hale, 1972, p. 47.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    W. Baldamus. 1979. Alienation, anomie and industrial accidents, in M. J. Wilson (ed.), Social and Educational Research in Action, p. 130. London: Longman/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    J. A. C. Brown. 1954. The Social Psychology of Industry, pp. 266–270. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    See A. J. McIvor. 1987. Manual work, technology and industrial health, 1918–39. Medical History 31:160–189, for an interesting analysis that includes reflections on differential company demands for “modern” health-related practices created by the Industrial Health Research Board.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. Chapanis. 1983. Human engineering, in International Labour Organisation. 1983. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, p. 1062. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    G. Ribeill. 1980. Le débuts de l’ergonomie en France à la vielle de la Premiére Guerre Mondiale. Mouvement Social 113: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    A. Laville. 1976. L’Ergonomie, p. 16. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Anon. 1961. Ergonomics: The scientific approach to making work human. International Labour Review 83(1): 1–35 (pp. 26–31 ).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Laville, 1976, p. 116.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    M. de Montmollin. 1982. L’analyse du travail, l’ergonomie la “qualité de la vie de travail” les Américains et nous. Le Travail Humain 45 (1): 119–124.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    One strong index of this is de Montmollin’s judgment that J.-M. Faverge, highly influential in continental Europe, was a thinker whose influence “was never felt in the United States.” See de Montmollin, 1982, p. 120.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    The analysis of Brazil is based on personal observation. A. Laville, in personal correspondence of November 7, 1984, discussed the Japanese situation.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    P. W. J. Bartrip and S. B. Burman. 1983. The Wounded Soldiers of Industry-Industrial Compensation Policy 1833–1897, pp. 208ff. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chamber of Commerce of the United States. 1976. Analysis of Workers’ Compensation Laws, pp. 24–25. Washington, DC: Chamber of Commerce of the United States. Berman, 1978, p. 54.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    T. G. Ison. 1967. The Forensic Lottery. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Juffe, 1980, p. 28.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Juffe, 1980, p. 29.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    A close study of Washington state’s law has been conducted by J. F. Tripp. 1976. An instance of labor and business cooperation: Workmen’s compensation in Washington state (1911). Labor History 17 (4): 530–550.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Berman, 1978, p. 64.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Berman, 1978, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Berman, 1978, p. 59–67.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    R. Lubove. 1986. The Struggle for Social Security, 1900–1935,p. 59. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. (1st ed. 1968.)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    A. M. Skolnik and D. N. Price. 1974. Workmen’s compensation payments and cost, 1972. Social Security Bulletin January, pp. 30–34, cited in Berman, 1978, p. 62. Ashford, 1976, pp. 394ff, provides another discussion.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Juffe, 1980, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ashford, 1976, pp. 47ff. Juffe, 1980, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    International Labour Office. 1923. Factory Inspection, p. 6. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    W. G. Carson. 1979. The conventionalisation of early factory crime. International Journal for the Sociology of Law 7:37–60. Juffe, 1980, pp. 34ff. J. A. Page and M. W. O’Brien. 1973. Bitter Wages, pp. 80–85. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    D. J. Curran. 1984. Symbolic solutions for deadly dilemmas: An analysis of federal coal mine health and safety legislation. International Journal of Health Services 14 (1): 5–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Eva and Oswald, 1981, pp. 29–36; and Robens (Lord). 1972. Safety and Health at Work, pp. 182–183. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    H. M. Hudspeth. 1937. Explosions in Coal Mines: A Comparison between Great Britain and France. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    For E. Freidson. 1986. Professional Powers,pp. 227–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. “In the largely hidden process of standard setting we come closest to the circumstances in which Foucault’s use of the word pouvoir (power) may be relevant. It delineates a force so pervasive as to shape the world and control systematically the content and process of human life without having to rely on physical coercion…. Are… standards heavily structured by the disciplines whose members participate in their creation? Are they embodiments of formal knowledge into a powerful unilateral, formal scheme organized around the dominating ideas of disciplines?”Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    D. J. Lofgren. 1989. Dangerous Premises: an Insider’s View of OSHA Enforcement, p. 208. Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press. This interesting study and the sophisticated view of inspection activity that Nicolas Dodier is currently structuring in France, both of which have recently come to my attention, hold considerable promise for the development of sociological perspectives on inspectors’ operations. See N. Dodier. 1987. Modèles d’entreprises et prévention des risques professionnels: L’action des inspecteurs du travail. Cahiers du Centre d’Études de l’Emploi 30:115–152. N. Dodier. 1988. Les actes de l’inspection du travail en matière de sécurité: La place du droit dans la justification des relèves d’infraction. Sciences Sociales et Santé 4(1):7–28, and the commentary on this paper in P. Chaumette and P.-J. Hess. 1988. Le point de vue du juriste sur l’inspection du travail. Sciences Sociales et Santé 4 (1): 29–31.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    International Labour Office, 1923, pp. 17, 22–23, 43–44.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Juffe, 1981, p. 34–46. “Little by little the inspector learns to impose self-censorship... so that the process of registering minor infractions doesn’t go off the tracks” (p. 42).Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Unpublished data furnished by the French Labor Ministry.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Chief Inspector of Factories. 1971. Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Factories, pp. 50, 100. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    See Juffe, 1981; Berman, 1978; and Eva and Oswald, 1981.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    A. Hopkins and N. Parnell. 1984. Why coal mine safety regulations in Australia are not enforced. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 12:179–194. H. E. Holland. 1914. The Huntly Explosion, Report by H. E. Holland of Evidence Given at Enquiry, and Royal Commission’s Report. Maoriland Worker (New Zealand).Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Juffe, 1980, p. 155.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Chief Inspector of Factories, 1971, pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Eva and Oswald, 1981, p. 30.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    P. Cam. 1978. Juges rouges et droit du travail. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. 19: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations. 1971. Inspection Effectiveness Report. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relafions, cited in L. Ellis. 1975. A review of research on efforts to promote occupational safety. Journal of Safety Research 7(4):180–189 (p. 182).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Graebner, 1976, p. 130.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Page and O’Brien, 1973, p. 59. Eva and Oswald, 1981, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    A. Derickson. 1989. Part of the yellow dog: U.S. coal miners’ opposition to the company doctor system. 1936–1946. International Journal of Health Services 19 (4): 709–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    D. Rosner and G. Markowitz. 1984–85. Safety and health on the job as a class issue: The Workers’ Health Bureau of America in the 1920s. Science and Society 48(4):466482.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    R. C. Clutterbuck. 1983. The state of industrial ill-health in the United Kingdom, in V. Navarro and D. M. Berman. 1983. Health and Work under Capitalism, pp. 141–151. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Graebner, 1976, pp. 114–115. Neville, 1979, p. 65.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Heinrich, 1959, pp. 49, 140.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    H. Francis and D. Smith. 1980. The Fed: A History of the South Wales Miners in the Twentieth Century. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Clutterbuck, 1983, p. 145.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    G. Assennato and V. Navarro. 1983. Workers’ participation and control in Italy: The case of occupational medicine, in Navarro and Berman (eds.), 1983. pp. 152–167 (p. 156 ).Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    G. Roustang. 1983. Worker participation in occupational safety and health matters in France. International Labour Review 122(2): 169–182 (p. 169 ).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    G. Berlinguer. 1983. Medicina e Politica, p. 14. Sao Paulo: CEBES-Hucitec.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    D. Duclos. 1984. La Santé et le Travail, p. 23. Paris: Decouverte.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Two important literature reviews show this. See Ellis, 1975, pp. 183–184; and Hale and Hale, 1972, p. 78.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    J. Goldthorpe, D. Lockwood, F. Bechhofer, and J. Platt. 1968. The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. J. Goldthorpe, D. Lockwood, F. Bechhofer, and J. Platt. 1968. The Affluent Worker: Political Attitudes and Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. R. Dubin. 1956. Industrial workers’ worlds: A study of the central life interests of industrial workers. Social Problems 3 (1): 131–142.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Eva and Oswald, 1981, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    L. S. Bacow. 1980. Bargaining for Job Safety and Health, p. 96. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    D. Reid. 1981. The role of mine safety in the development of working-class consciousness and organisation: The case of the Aubin Coal Basin, 1867–1914. French Historical Studies 12:98–119, contains independent confirmation of the generality of this notion beyond Britain’s shores. In the specific case of French mines, owners are seen to attack the idea of workmens’ inspectors, more than they do the idea of state regulation as being incompatible with private property rights.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    R. Edwards. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century, chap. 8. New York: Basic Books. M. Buroway. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Assennato and Navarro, 1983, p. 156.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    See J. F. Byrne. 1975. Let’s unleash the employee. Professional Safety 20(6):45–52, for one example.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    J. E. Aberton. 1980. Labor unions and accident prevention: Champion or adversary? Professional Safety 25(11):19–20, argues in favor of unions assisting management to improve worker safety and in favor of institutional relations between employers and unions “to mutual advantage.”Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    C. Dejours. 1980. Travail: Usure Mentale. Essai de Psychopathologie du Travail. Paris: Centurion.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Building Accidents Committee. 1908. Building Accidents Committee 1907. Parliamentary Papers, 1908, vol XI (cmd. 3848 ). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    T. Dwyer. 1981. Hit and miss. Industrial Relations (New Zealand) 1 (6): 24–30.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    N. Q. Herrick and R. P. Quinn. 1971. The working conditions survey as a source of social indicators. Monthly Labor Review 94(4): 15–24 (p. 16 ).Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Berman, 1978, 119.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    P. G. Donnelly. 1982. The origins of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. Social Problems 30(1): 13–25 (p. 18 ).Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Clutterbuck, 1983, p. 147.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    M. Yarrow. 1979. The labor process in coal mining: Struggle for control, in A. Zimbalist (ed.). Case Studies on the Labor Process, pp. 170–192. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    J.-P. Faye. 1973. Lutte des Classes d Dunkerque. Paris: Galilee.Google Scholar
  127. Assennato and Navarro, 1983. Bagnara et al.,1981.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    C. Reasons, L. Ross, and C. Paterson. 1981. Assault on the Worker: Occupational Safety and Health in Canada, chap. 12. Toronto: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    V. Navarro. 1983. The determinants of social policy; A case study: Regulating health and safety at the workplace in Sweden. International Journal of Health Services 13(4):517561.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    P. Thomas. 1973. Taming the Concrete Jungle, pp. 12ff. Sydney: New South Wales Branch of the Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders’ Laborers Federation.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    R. de Reamer. 1980. Modern Safety and Health Technology,p. 5. New York: Wiley. National Safety Council statistics concluded that a drop of 80 percent in the frequency of disabling injuries occurred between 1926 and 1961 and that an 81 percent rise occurred between 1961 and 1976. In Britain a rise in the rate from 19.9 in 1962 to 31.7 per 1,000 employees at risk in 1967 was observed. See Baldamus, 1979, p. 105.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Hale and Hale, 1972, p. 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Dwyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Estadual de CampinasSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations