Advertisement

Administrative Considerations and Responsibilities

Legal and Ethical Issues
  • Robert G. Griffith
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Organizations exist for many purposes in both the public and private sectors. In a gross economic sense, they may be characterized as for profit or nonprofit, and their ultimate purpose may be manufacturing, sales, finance, or service. One thing they all have in common is that they are composed of people, and people must behave in certain ways in order for organizations to fulfill their purposes (Herbert, 1976). This is true whether they manufacture transistors or attempt to cure people who are mentally or physically sick.

Keywords

Maladaptive Behavior Mental Deficiency Human Service Organization Procedural Safeguard Residential Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association on Mental Deficiency. (1977). Consent handbook. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Bar Association. (1983). Commission on the Mentally Disabled, summary and analysis. Mental Disability Law Reporter, 7, 67–69.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (1977). Standards for providers of psychological services (rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. ARC of North Dakota v. Olson, No. A1-80-141 (D.N.D. Aug. 31, 1982) as reported in Mental Disability Law Reporter, (1982), 6, 374-376.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and organization. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Axelrod, S., & Apsche, J. (Eds.). (1983). The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig & W. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  8. Barbara C. v. Magnone, No. C-2-77-887 (5D. Ohio, Oct. 19, 1981).Google Scholar
  9. Barrish, I. J. (1974). Ethical issues and answers to behavior modification. Corrective and Social Psychiatry & Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 20, 30–37.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1969). Dilemmas of formal organization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), Readings on modern organizations (pp. 138–147). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Braun, S. H. (1975). Ethical issues in behavior modification. Behavior Therapy, 6, 51–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bucher, B. (1969). Some ethical issues in the therapeutic use of punishment. In R. D. Rubin & C. M. Franks (Eds.), Advances in behavior therapy (pp. 59–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carrera, R., & Actams, P. I. (1970). An ethical perspective on operant conditions. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 9, 607–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christian, W. P. (1983). Professional peer review: Recommended strategies for reviewer and reviewee. The Behavior Therapist, 6, 86–89.Google Scholar
  15. Christian, W. P., & Hannah, G. T. (1983). Effective management in human services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Clites v. State of Iowa, Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County (Law No. 46274, Aug. 7, 1980). Affirmed, Court of Appeals of Iowa (No. 2-65599, June 29, 1982).Google Scholar
  17. Cooke, T. P., & Cooke, S. (1974). Behavior modification: Answers to some ethical issues. Psychology in the Schools, 11, 5–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (1977). Child abuse and neglect in residential institutions: Selected readings on prevention, investigation, and correction. Washington, DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.Google Scholar
  19. Drucker, P. F. (1974). Mangement: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Durkin, R. (1982). Institutional child abuse from a family systems perspective: A working paper. Child & Youth Services, 4(1,2), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Education for All Handicapped Children Act. (1975). 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq., PL 94-142.Google Scholar
  22. Education for Handicapped Children, Implementation of Part B of the Education of the Handicapped Act. 42 C.F.R. (1977). Federal Register, 42474-42518.Google Scholar
  23. Ellis, J. W. (1982). The supreme court and institutions: A comment on Youngberg v. Romeo. Mental Retardation, 20, 197–200.Google Scholar
  24. Etzioni, A. (Ed.). (1969). Readings on modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Eyman, R. K., & Call, T. (1977). Maladaptive behavior and community placement of mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 137–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eyman, R. K., Borthwick, S. A., & Miller, C. (1981). Trends in maladaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons placed in community and institutional settings. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 473–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Getzels, J. W. (1958). Administration as a social process. In A. W. Halpin (Ed.), Administrative theory in education (pp. 150–165). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Gibson, R. W. (1976). The rights of staff in the treatment of the mentally ill. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 27(12), 855–859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gil, E. (1982). Institutional abuse of children in out-of-home care. Child & Youth Services, 4(1,2), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldiamond, I. (1975). Singling out behavior modification for legal regulation: Some effects on patient care, psychotherapy, and research in general. Arizona Law Review, 17, 105–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffith, R. G. (1980). An administrative perspective on guidelines for behavior modification: The creation of a legally safe environment. The Behavior Therapist, 3(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
  32. Griffith, R. G. (1983). The administrative issues: An ethical and legal perspective. In S. Axelrod & J. Apsche (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior (pp. 317–338). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Griffith, R. G. (1984). Client abuse: Broadening the perspective. Superintendents’ Digest, 2, 46–52.Google Scholar
  34. Griffith, R. G., & Coval, T. E. (1984). The mentally retarded and the right to refuse habilitation. In S. E. Breuning, J. L. Matson, & R. P. Barrett (Eds.), Advances in mental retardation and developmental disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 237–268). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  35. Griffith, R. G., & Henning, D. B. (1981). What is a human rights committee?. Mental Retardation, 19(3), 61–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Halderman v. Pennhurst, 673 F.2d 647 (3d Cir. 1982).Google Scholar
  37. Halderman, et al. v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital, 446 F. Supp. 1295 (E.D. Pa. 1977).Google Scholar
  38. Harris, S. L., & Ersner-Hershfield, R. (1978). Behavioral suppression of seriously disruptive behavior in psychotic and retarded patients: A review of punishment and its alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 85(6), 1352–1375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herbert, T. T. (1976). Dimensions of organizational behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: The World Publishing Co. Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977).Google Scholar
  41. Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health for the State of Michigan. No. 73-19434-AW (Mich. Cir. Ct., Wayne County, July 10, 1973) as reported in Mental Disability Law Reporter, (1976), 1, 147-154.Google Scholar
  42. Knecht v. Gillman, 488 F.2d. 1136 (8th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  43. Lakin, K. C., Hill, B. K., Hauber, F. A., Bruininks, R. H., & Heal, L. W. (1983). New admissions and readmissions to a national sample of public residential facilities. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Levick, M., & Wapner, A. (1975). Advances in mental health: A case for the right to refuse treatment. Temple Law Quarterly, 48, 354–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mackey v. Procunier, 477 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  46. Martin, R. (1975). Legal challenges to behavior modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  47. Martin, R. (1981). Legal issues in preserving client rights. In G. T. Hannah, W. P. Christian, & H. B. Clark (Eds.), Preservation of client rights (pp. 3–13). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Maslow, A. H. (1965). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  49. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Mills et al., Petitioners, v. Rogers et ai, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 80-1417 (1982).Google Scholar
  51. Mills, M. J., Yesavage, J. A., & Gutheil, T. G. (1981). Continuing case-law development in the right to refuse treatment. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  52. Morgan v. Sproat, 432 F. Supp. 1130 (5 D. Miss. 1977).Google Scholar
  53. New Jersey ARC., Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Human Services, 445 A.2d 704 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1982).Google Scholar
  54. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  55. Parham v. J. R., 443 U.S. 584 (1979).Google Scholar
  56. Rachlin, S. (1982). Toward a definition of staff rights. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 33(1), 60–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rennie v. Klein, 653 F.2d 836 (3rd. Cir. 1981).Google Scholar
  58. Risley, T. R. (1975). Certify procedures not people. In W. S. Wood (Ed.), Issues in evaluating behavior modification (pp. 159–181). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  59. Romeo v. Youngberg, 644 F.2d 147 (1980).Google Scholar
  60. Roos, P. (1972). Reconciling behavior modification procedures with the normalization principle. In W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), Normalization (pp. 136-148). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  61. Rouse v. Cameron, 373 F.2d 451 (1966).Google Scholar
  62. Scanlon, C. A., Arick, J. R., & Krug, D. A. (1982). A matched sample investigation of nonadaptive behavior of severely handicapped adults across four living situations. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 526–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Secretary of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania v. Institutionalized Juveniles, 442 U.S. 640 (1979).Google Scholar
  64. Sheldon-Wildgen, J. (1982). Avoiding legal liability: The rights and responsibilities of therapists. The Behavior Therapist, 5, 165–169.Google Scholar
  65. Sheldon-Wildgen, J., & Risley, T. (1982). Balancing clients’ rights: The establishment of human rights and peer review committees. In A. Bellack, M. Hersen, & A. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification (pp. 263–289). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 (1960).Google Scholar
  67. Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  68. Standards for Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded, 43 C.F.R., subpart 442-400 (1978).Google Scholar
  69. Stolz, S. B., & Associates. (1978). Ethical issues in behavior modification. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  70. Sutter, P., Mayeda, T., Call, T., Yanagi, G., & Yee, S. (1980). Comparison of successful and unsuccessful community-placed mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 262–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tanner, B. A. (1973). Aversive shock issues: Physical danger, emotional harm, effectiveness and “dehumanization.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 4, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turnbull, H. R., Ellis, J. W., Boogs, E. M., Brooks, P. O., & Biklen, D. P. (1981). The least restrictive alternative: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
  73. Welsch v. Likins, 373 F. Supp. 487 (D. Minn. 1974).Google Scholar
  74. Wheeler v. Glass, 473 F.2d (7th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  75. Wuori v. Zitnay, Civil Action N. 75-80 S.D. (D. Me. July 21, 1978).Google Scholar
  76. Wyatt v. Aderhold, 503 F.2d 1305 (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar
  77. Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F. Supp. 373, 344 F. Supp. 387 (M.D. Ala. 1972).Google Scholar
  78. Youngberg v. Romeo, 102 5 Ct. (1982).Google Scholar
  79. Ziarnik, J. P. (1980). Developing proactive direct care staff. Mental Retardation, 18, 289–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Griffith
    • 1
  1. 1.Elwyn Institutes’ National Rehabilitation CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations